Comparison of Three-dimensional and Two-dimensional Left Ventricle Strain With Speckle-tracking Echocardiography in Heart Failure With Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.
3V2-STEM-HF
Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain Assessed by Three-dimensional Speckle-tracking Echocardiography in Heart Failure With Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction. A Comparison With Two-dimensional Evaluation in a Prospective Study
1 other identifier
observational
419
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study will compare two ultrasound techniques, 2D and 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography, for measuring how well the heart muscle contracts in patients with heart failure and reduced pumping function. While 2D global longitudinal strain (GLS) is widely used and has proven value in predicting outcomes, 3D GLS may provide a more complete assessment of heart function. Researchers will enroll 419 patients from seven cardiac rehabilitation hospitals in Italy and analyze heart ultrasound images using standardized equipment and software. The study will assess how closely 2D and 3D GLS measurements agree, identify factors that influence any differences, and determine whether 3D GLS better predicts the risk of death than 2D GLS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2026
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
August 3, 2026
July 1, 2026
2 years
July 28, 2026
July 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bland-Altman mean difference (bias) and the limits of agreement (LOA) in comparison with a clinically acceptable range (±6.5%)
Bias and the LOA will be compared with a clinically acceptable range (±6.5%)
At baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Covariates and Confounders
At baseline
Comparison of all-cause mortality by 2D and 3D global longitudinal strain
From enrollment to the end of follow-up (1 year)
Study Arms (1)
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF)
Patients with HFrEF or EFmrEF will be assessed with 2D and 3D echocardiography to evaluate the agreement between 2D and 3D global longitudinal strain measurements
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with a diagnosis of heart failure and a reduced or mildly reduced ejection fration of left ventricle
You may qualify if:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 49%;
- Echocardiographic image quality judged to be at least adequate according to a four-point visual image quality scale (good, adequate, poor, or inadequate)
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to maintain the correct position for acquiring echocardiographic images;
- Arrhythmias that make multi-beat acquisition impossible (if required), such as frequent extrasystoles (supraventricular or ventricular) and atrial fibrillation;
- Failure to visualize more than 2 segments of the left ventricle (LV), or inability to assess more than 3 segments during 3D GLS analysis;
- Failure to sign the informed consent form and inability of the participant to understand the objectives of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
ICS Maugeri - Istituto di Bari
Bari, BA, 70124, Italy
ICS Maugeri - Istituto di Milano
Milan, MI, 20138, Italy
ICS Maugeri - Istituto di Pavia
Pavia, PV, 27100, Italy
ICS Maugeri Torino
Torino, TO, 10124, Italy
ICS Maugeri - Istituto di Veruno
Veruno, 28013, Italy
Related Publications (6)
Saito K, Okura H, Watanabe N, Hayashida A, Obase K, Imai K, Maehama T, Kawamoto T, Neishi Y, Yoshida K. Comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular strain using speckle tracking echocardiography in normal adults: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional approaches. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Sep;22(9):1025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
PMID: 19556106BACKGROUNDMuraru D, Cucchini U, Mihaila S, Miglioranza MH, Aruta P, Cavalli G, Cecchetto A, Padayattil-Jose S, Peluso D, Iliceto S, Badano LP. Left ventricular myocardial strain by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in healthy subjects: reference values and analysis of their physiologic and technical determinants. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):858-871.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
PMID: 24975996BACKGROUNDKalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction. Heart. 2014 Nov;100(21):1673-80. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305538. Epub 2014 May 23.
PMID: 24860005BACKGROUNDHjertaas JJ, Fossa H, Dybdahl GL, Gruner R, Lunde P, Matre K. Accuracy of real-time single- and multi-beat 3-d speckle tracking echocardiography in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Jun;39(6):1006-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
PMID: 23562013BACKGROUNDGeyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, Wilansky S, Carerj S, Gentile F, Nesser HJ, Khandheria B, Narula J, Sengupta PP. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Apr;23(4):351-69; quiz 453-5. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.015.
PMID: 20362924BACKGROUNDAly D, Madan N, Kuzava L, Samrany A, Parthiban A. Comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular deformation using speckle tracking echocardiography in normal children: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional approaches. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2022 Jan 27;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12947-022-00273-6.
PMID: 35086543BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2026
First Posted
August 3, 2026
Study Start
January 8, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
August 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Start date: 6 months after publication of the primary study results. End date: 5 years after publication of the primary study results.
- Access Criteria
- De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results, together with the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the principal investigator. Access will be granted following review and approval of a research proposal and completion of a data-sharing agreement. Data will be provided electronically in a secure manner
All data (anonymized)