Medical Large Language Model-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management
Verification and Application Study of Medical Large Language Model-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to explore the feasibility of using medical large language models to assist in chronic disease management. By setting up experimental and control group interventions and having experts blindly evaluate anonymized cases, it compares different management approaches in chronic disease care, verifying the scientific basis, effectiveness, and potential for broader use of medical large language models in supporting chronic disease management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Aug 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 17, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2026
July 31, 2026
July 1, 2026
1 month
July 20, 2026
July 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
expert overall scores
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale on several aspects: accuracy of condition assessment, reasonableness of test recommendations, reasonableness of treatment plans, appropriateness of management choices, scientific nature of patient education content, feasibility at the primary care level, overall clinical quality. Experts were instructed to rank the seven dimensions from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
Secondary Outcomes (10)
accuracy of condition assessment
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
reasonableness of test recommendations
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
reasonableness of treatment plans
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
appropriateness of management choices
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
scientific nature of patient education content
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LLM-Assisted Intervention Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrimary care doctors creating management plans for chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke) with the help of large medical language models
Usual Care Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONPrimary care doctors creating management plans for chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke) without the help of a large medical language model
Interventions
The primary care physicians in the intervention group completed the management decisions for chronic disease cases, including disease assessment, examination suggestions, treatment plans, selection of management methods, and health education, with the assistance of the medical LLM.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Work experience of 3 years or more;
- Able to complete the case assessment tasks required by the study;
- Have a practicing doctor qualification;
- Work at a township health center or community health service center;
- Voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- N/A
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2026
First Posted
July 31, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
August 17, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Last Updated
July 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share