NCT07736690

Brief Summary

This prospective comparative study evaluates whether perioperative topical nepafenac improves early anatomical and functional recovery after pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling. The study compares postoperative visual acuity, central macular thickness, and other clinical outcomes between patients treated with perioperative nepafenac and those receiving standard postoperative care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2026

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 27, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 27, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Epiretinal MembranePars Plana VitrectomyNepafenacInternal Limiting Membrane PeelingOptical Coherence TomographyAnti-inflammatory Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

    To compare the change in best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) between the perioperative nepafenac group and the control group following epiretinal membrane surgery.

    6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Central Macular Thickness (CMT)

    6 months after surgery

  • Integrity of the Ellipsoid Zone

    6 months after surgery

  • Postoperative Complications

    6 months after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1: Nepafenac Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received perioperative topical nepafenac in addition to pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling.

Drug: Nepafenac 0.1% Ophthalmic SuspensionProcedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Epiretinal Membrane and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

Arm 2: Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants underwent pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling without perioperative topical nepafenac.

Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Epiretinal Membrane and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

Interventions

Topical nepafenac 0.1% administered three times daily beginning one week before surgery and continued for four weeks after surgery, in addition to standard postoperative treatment.

Arm 1: Nepafenac Group

Standard pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling performed for epiretinal membrane.

Arm 1: Nepafenac GroupArm 2: Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic epiretinal membrane requiring pars plana vitrectomy.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity impairment and/or metamorphopsia attributed to epiretinal membrane.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness to complete the scheduled follow-up examinations for 6 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Previous vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye.
  • Other retinal diseases that could affect visual or anatomical outcomes (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration).
  • Significant ocular trauma.
  • Active ocular inflammation or infection.
  • Advanced glaucoma or optic neuropathy affecting visual function.
  • Media opacity preventing adequate retinal imaging.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

Ankara, Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Epiretinal Membrane

Interventions

nepafenac

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DiseasesEye Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were assigned to one of two parallel groups. One group received perioperative topical nepafenac in addition to standard surgical treatment, while the control group received standard surgical treatment without perioperative nepafenac. Outcomes were compared between the two groups during postoperative follow-up.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2026

First Posted

July 30, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

January 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared

Locations