Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Versus Intravenous Tramadol for Positioning of Femur Fracture Patients Before Spinal Anaesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical study compared two methods of pain relief used before spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for a femur fracture. Positioning a patient with a fractured femur into the side-lying position required for spinal anaesthesia can cause severe pain because movement may disturb the fractured bone. A total of 64 patients aged 18 to 60 years were included and were assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group received intravenous tramadol, while the other group received an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block, in which local anaesthetic was injected near the nerves supplying the hip and upper thigh. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale when the patient arrived on the operating table and again during positioning in the lateral decubitus position before spinal anaesthesia. The study was conducted to determine which treatment provided better pain relief and made positioning for spinal anaesthesia more comfortable. It was hypothesized that the ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block would reduce pain during positioning more effectively than intravenous tramadol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2026
CompletedJuly 30, 2026
July 1, 2026
6 months
July 25, 2026
July 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Intensity During Positioning for Spinal Anaesthesia
Pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 visual analogue scale during placement of the participant in the lateral decubitus position before spinal anaesthesia. A score of 0 represented no pain, while a score of 10 represented the worst possible pain. Lower scores indicated better analgesic efficacy.
10 minutes after intravenous tramadol or 15 minutes after ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block, immediately before spinal anaesthesia.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score From Baseline to Positioning
10 minutes after intravenous tramadol or 15 minutes after fascia iliaca compartment block.
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block through the infrainguinal approach using 30 mL of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline. After 15 minutes, participants were positioned in the lateral decubitus position for spinal anaesthesia, and pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale.
Intravenous Tramadol Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received intravenous tramadol at a dose of 1 mg/kg. After 10 minutes, participants were positioned in the lateral decubitus position for spinal anaesthesia, and pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale.
Interventions
An ultrasound-guided infrainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block was administered with 30 mL of 1% lidocaine containing adrenaline.
Tramadol was administered intravenously at a dose of 1 mg/kg before positioning for spinal anaesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-60 years
- Male or female patients
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
- Patients scheduled for femur fracture surgery under spinal anaesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple fractures
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Inability to communicate or provide reliable pain assessment
- History of allergy to local anaesthetic agents
- Contraindication to spinal anaesthesia, including:
- Patient refusal
- Local infection at the injection site
- Coagulopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Hospital, Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adeel Ahmed
Mayo Hospital Lahore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2026
First Posted
July 30, 2026
Study Start
August 10, 2024
Primary Completion
February 10, 2025
Study Completion
February 10, 2025
Last Updated
July 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07