Semaglutide for Low Back Pain
A Randomized-Controlled Trial of Semaglutide for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Obesity
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Low back pain is the leading cause of disability in the United States, and obesity is a major risk factor for its development. GLP-1 receptor agonists such as Semaglutide have emerged as effective weight loss agents that may also reduce chronic pain through weight reduction and other mechanisms. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will enroll 250 adults with chronic low back pain and obesity, randomized 1:1 to weekly Semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary outcome is change in low back pain severity, with secondary outcomes including pain-related disability and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2027
Typical duration for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2031
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2031
July 28, 2026
July 1, 2026
3.9 years
June 28, 2026
July 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
BPI-SF Pain Severity Scale
The primary endpoint will be change in low back pain severity, measured using the 0-10 BPI-SF Pain Severity Scale. This outcome will be compared in the treatment group versus placebo.
Baseline, up to 52 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
BPI-SF Pain Interference
Baseline, up to 52 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Baseline, up to 52 weeks
SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Baseline, up to 52 weeks
PROMIS Depression
Baseline, up to 52 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Baseline, up to 52 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Semaglutide Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe experimental group will receive Semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously administered on the same day weekly at any time of the day without regard to meals. To achieve the weekly 2.4 mg maintenance dose, subjects will start at 0.24 mg weekly for 28 days and then increase to 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg, and 2.4 mg every 4 weeks. The clinical pen is a 3 mL PDS290 pen-injector containing Semaglutide 3.0 mg/mL for subcutaneous use. Treatment duration is 52 weeks.
Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe placebo group will receive a matched placebo administered subcutaneously on the same day weekly at any time of the day without regard to meals, following the same escalating dose schedule as the active comparator. The clinical pen is a 3 mL PDS290 pen-injector containing placebo solution for subcutaneous use. Treatment duration is 52 weeks.
Interventions
Semaglutide 3.0 mg/mL solution for subcutaneous injection, administered using a 3 mL PDS290 pen-injector. Administered subcutaneously once weekly on the same day each week, without regard to meals. Dose escalation: 0.24 mg weekly for 28 days, then increased to 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg, and 2.4 mg every 4 weeks to reach the maintenance dose of 2.4 mg. The pen uses a drum scale of 1-80 (in increments of 1); corresponding dose counter values are: 0.24 mg = 8, 0.5 mg = 17, 1.0 mg = 34, 1.7 mg = 57, 2.4 mg = 80. Treatment duration is 52 weeks.
Matching placebo solution for subcutaneous injection, administered using a 3 mL PDS290 pen-injector. Administered subcutaneously once weekly on the same day each week, without regard to meals, following the same escalating dose counter schedule as the active comparator (counter values: 8, 17, 34, 57, 80 every 4 weeks). Treatment duration is 52 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ability to provide informed consent before any trial-related activities
- Age: 18-85 years
- Chronic low back pain, defined as an average low back pain severity of at least 4/10 present on most days for 3 months or longer.
- BMI: 30-49 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Known or suspected allergy to trial medication(s), excipients, or related products
- Contraindications to study medication(s), worded specifically as stated in the product's Prescribing Information
- Previous randomization in this trial
- Pregnant, breastfeeding, or the intention of becoming pregnant or not using adequate contraceptive measures
- Low back pain related to infection, trauma, or malignancy
- Plans to undergo new back pain interventions within 3 months.
- Considering or have been offered surgery to treat structural disease believed to cause their low back pain, including infection, severe degeneration adjacent to a prior fusion, mobile spondylolisthesis, severe central lumbar stenosis, coronal or sagittal deformity, or other severe structural pathology diagnosed by a board-certified spine surgeon. Ambiguous cases will be adjudicated by a board-certified spine surgeon.
- Another source of pain that is more severe than their low back pain (e.g., headache or radiculopathy)
- History of or plans to undergo bariatric weight loss surgery
- History of a major abdominal or stomach surgery that might affect drug absorption
- Decrease in body weight of \> 5 kg within 3 months of screening
- History of diabetes mellitus, with HbA1c \> 7 or requiring medical treatment (i.e., insulin or other diabetes medication other than Metformin).
- Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as a systolic blood pressure (BP) \> 155 mmHg or a diastolic BP \> 100 mmHg
- Clinically significant congestive heart failure, defined as New York Heart Association Class IV, or active symptoms related to heart failure, or exacerbation requiring hospitalization within 90 days of screening.
- Any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris, or transient ischemic attack within 90 days of screening.
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicinelead
- Novo Nordisk A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (2)
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63108, United States
Related Publications (21)
Smith SM, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Eccleston C, Farrar JT, Rowbotham MC, Bhagwagar Z, Burke LB, Cowan P, Ellenberg SS, Evans SR, Freeman RL, Garrison LP, Iyengar S, Jadad A, Jensen MP, Junor R, Kamp C, Katz NP, Kesslak JP, Kopecky EA, Lissin D, Markman JD, Mease PJ, O'Connor AB, Patel KV, Raja SN, Sampaio C, Schoenfeld D, Singh J, Steigerwald I, Strand V, Tive LA, Tobias J, Wasan AD, Wilson HD. Interpretation of chronic pain clinical trial outcomes: IMMPACT recommended considerations. Pain. 2020 Nov;161(11):2446-2461. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001952.
PMID: 32520773BACKGROUNDvan Lennep JHPA, Trossel F, Perez RSGM, Otten RHJ, van Middendorp H, Evers AWM, Szadek KM. Placebo effects in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Pain. 2021 Oct;25(9):1876-1897. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1811. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
PMID: 34051018BACKGROUNDGarvey WT, Frias JP, Jastreboff AM, le Roux CW, Sattar N, Aizenberg D, Mao H, Zhang S, Ahmad NN, Bunck MC, Benabbad I, Zhang XM; SURMOUNT-2 investigators. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Aug 19;402(10402):613-626. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01200-X. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
PMID: 37385275BACKGROUNDQaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PMID: 28192789BACKGROUNDChiarotto A, Koes BW. Nonspecific Low Back Pain. N Engl J Med. 2022 May 5;386(18):1732-1740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2032396. No abstract available.
PMID: 35507483BACKGROUNDCleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
PMID: 8080219BACKGROUNDHe Y, Xu B, Zhang M, Chen D, Wu S, Gao J, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Kuang J, Fang Q. Advances in GLP-1 receptor agonists for pain treatment and their future potential. J Headache Pain. 2025 Feb 27;26(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01979-4.
PMID: 40016636BACKGROUNDSamajdar SS, Bhaduri G, Ghoshal PK, Mukherjee S, Pal J, Chatterjee N, Joshi SR. Dual effects of dulaglutide on glycemic control and knee osteoarthritis pain in elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes. Pain Manag. 2024;14(7):365-373. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2402214. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
PMID: 39301951BACKGROUNDEmmerich SD, Fryar CD, Stierman B, Ogden CL. Obesity and Severe Obesity Prevalence in Adults: United States, August 2021-August 2023. NCHS Data Brief. 2024 Sep;(508):10.15620/cdc/159281. doi: 10.15620/cdc/159281.
PMID: 39808758BACKGROUNDShiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E. The association between obesity and low back pain: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jan 15;171(2):135-54. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp356. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
PMID: 20007994BACKGROUNDJackson T, Thomas S, Stabile V, Shotwell M, Han X, McQueen K. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Global Burden of Chronic Pain Without Clear Etiology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Trends in Heterogeneous Data and a Proposal for New Assessment Methods. Anesth Analg. 2016 Sep;123(3):739-48. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001389.
PMID: 27537761BACKGROUNDXie Y, Choi T, Al-Aly Z. Mapping the effectiveness and risks of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Nat Med. 2025 Mar;31(3):951-962. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03412-w. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
PMID: 39833406BACKGROUNDFelson DT. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 31;391(17):1643-1644. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2409972. No abstract available.
PMID: 39476345BACKGROUNDBliddal H, Bays H, Czernichow S, Udden Hemmingsson J, Hjelmesaeth J, Hoffmann Morville T, Koroleva A, Skov Neergaard J, Velez Sanchez P, Wharton S, Wizert A, Kristensen LE; STEP 9 Study Group. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Persons with Obesity and Knee Osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 31;391(17):1573-1583. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2403664.
PMID: 39476339BACKGROUNDWharton S, Blevins T, Connery L, Rosenstock J, Raha S, Liu R, Ma X, Mather KJ, Haupt A, Robins D, Pratt E, Kazda C, Konig M; GZGI Investigators. Daily Oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Orforglipron for Adults with Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 7;389(10):877-888. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302392. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
PMID: 37351564BACKGROUNDChen N, Fong DYT, Wong JYH. Health and Economic Outcomes Associated With Musculoskeletal Disorders Attributable to High Body Mass Index in 192 Countries and Territories in 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250674. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50674.
PMID: 36662529BACKGROUNDElgaeva EE, Tsepilov Y, Freidin MB, Williams FMK, Aulchenko Y, Suri P. ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2020. Examining causal effects of body mass index on back pain: a Mendelian randomization study. Eur Spine J. 2020 Apr;29(4):686-691. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06224-6. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PMID: 31797139BACKGROUNDChen LH, Weber K, Mehrabkhani S, Baskaran S, Abbass T, Macedo LG. The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 23;23(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05391-w.
PMID: 35606809BACKGROUNDDieleman JL, Cao J, Chapin A, Chen C, Li Z, Liu A, Horst C, Kaldjian A, Matyasz T, Scott KW, Bui AL, Campbell M, Duber HC, Dunn AC, Flaxman AD, Fitzmaurice C, Naghavi M, Sadat N, Shieh P, Squires E, Yeung K, Murray CJL. US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016. JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):863-884. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0734.
PMID: 32125402BACKGROUNDHartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, Hoy D, Karppinen J, Pransky G, Sieper J, Smeets RJ, Underwood M; Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
PMID: 29573870BACKGROUNDGBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 May 22;5(6):e316-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00098-X. eCollection 2023 Jun.
PMID: 37273833BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacob K Greenberg, MD, MSCI
Washington University School of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Burel R Goodin, PhD
Washington University School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2026
First Posted
July 28, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2031
Last Updated
July 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share