NCT07729618

Brief Summary

This pragmatic, multicenter, cluster-randomized trial will evaluate whether a locked artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision-support system can improve outcomes by helping multidisciplinary teams select first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based systemic treatment for adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Twenty-six hospitals or independent HCC multidisciplinary teams will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to AI-assisted treatment selection or usual-care treatment selection. Approximately 1,800 participants will be enrolled. Eligible participants must already be considered suitable for first-line ICI-based systemic therapy; the study does not compare immunotherapy with no immunotherapy. At AI-assisted sites, the system will use prespecified pretreatment information to estimate and compare expected outcomes across clinically appropriate, locally available, guideline-concordant ICI-based regimens. The AI output is advisory. Treating clinicians and patients retain responsibility for the final treatment decision, and reasons for not following an AI recommendation will be recorded. At usual-care sites, treatment will be selected through the standard multidisciplinary decision-making process without access to the AI output. Both groups will receive approved standard-of-care treatments. The AI model, input definitions, preprocessing pipeline, decision rules, thresholds, and software version will be locked before enrollment of the first participant and will not be retrained or modified using trial outcome data. Both groups will use the same eligibility criteria, patient-registration time point, imaging schedule, follow-up schedule, and outcome definitions. The primary outcome is progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central imaging review. Overall survival is a key secondary outcome. Additional outcomes include tumor response, duration of response, safety, quality of life, treatment delivery, and implementation measures. This trial evaluates the clinical utility of a prespecified AI system rather than developing or optimizing another prediction model.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,800

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
39mo left

Started Oct 2026

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2026

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2028

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2029

Last Updated

July 27, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

July 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningClinical Decision Support SystemImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsFirst-Line Systemic Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Progression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Using RECIST Version 1.1

    Progression-free survival is defined as the time from prospective participant registration to the first radiographically documented disease progression according to RECIST version 1.1, as determined by blinded independent central review, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants without either event will be censored at the date of their last adequate radiographic tumor assessment. Imaging assessments will follow the same prespecified schedule in both study groups.

    From participant registration until radiographic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 27 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Overall Survival

    From participant registration until death from any cause, assessed up to 44 months

  • Objective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Using RECIST Version 1.1

    From participant registration through the last tumor assessment before disease progression or initiation of new anticancer therapy, assessed up to 27 months

  • Duration of Response

    From the first documented response that is subsequently confirmed until radiographic disease progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 27 months

  • Disease Control Rate

    From participant registration through the last tumor assessment before disease progression or initiation of new anticancer therapy, assessed up to 27 months

  • Time to Treatment Failure

    From participant registration until failure of the initial first-line treatment strategy or death from any cause, assessed up to 27 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

AI-Assisted Treatment Selection

EXPERIMENTAL

At hospitals randomized to the AI-assisted strategy, eligible participants will receive first-line ICI-based systemic therapy selected with support from a locked AI clinical decision-support system. The system will use prespecified pretreatment information to compare and rank clinically appropriate, guideline-concordant treatment options. The AI output is advisory, and the final treatment decision remains with the multidisciplinary team and the participant.

Other: AI-Assisted Clinical Decision Support Strategy

Usual-Care Treatment Selection

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

At hospitals randomized to the usual-care strategy, eligible participants will receive first-line ICI-based systemic therapy selected through the standard multidisciplinary decision-making process without access to the AI output. Treatment selection will be based on contemporary guidelines, clinical characteristics, contraindications, treatment availability, clinician judgment, and participant preferences.

Other: Usual-Care Multidisciplinary Treatment-Selection Strategy

Interventions

A locked AI clinical decision-support system will analyze prespecified pretreatment information and provide the multidisciplinary team with patient-specific estimates and a comparative ranking of clinically appropriate first-line ICI-based treatment options. The recommendation is advisory and does not replace clinical judgment or shared decision-making.

AI-Assisted Treatment Selection

First-line ICI-based treatment will be selected through the hospital's usual multidisciplinary decision-making process without access to the AI clinical decision-support system. Participants will otherwise undergo the same eligibility assessment, follow-up schedule, and outcome ascertainment as participants in the AI-assisted arm.

Usual-Care Treatment Selection

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma confirmed by histology or cytology, or diagnosed using accepted noninvasive radiologic criteria.
  • Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma for which first-line systemic therapy is indicated, including Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B disease that is unsuitable for or no longer benefiting from locoregional therapy, or stage C disease.
  • No prior systemic anticancer therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • Child-Pugh class A liver function.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Eligible and intended to receive at least one protocol-specified, guideline-concordant immune checkpoint inhibitor-based first-line regimen, as determined by the treating clinician before exposure to the study AI recommendation.
  • Eligibility confirmed and prospective participant registration completed before the final first-line treatment regimen is selected.
  • Baseline contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging suitable for assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 is available before initiation of first-line systemic therapy.
  • Required pretreatment clinical data are available within the protocol-specified assessment windows.
  • Able to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma or another primary liver malignancy other than hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • A contraindication or clinical condition that makes all protocol-specified immune checkpoint inhibitor-based first-line regimens inappropriate according to applicable prescribing information and routine clinical practice.
  • Initiation of systemic therapy or completion of the final first-line regimen decision before prospective participant registration.
  • Exposure of the treating clinical team to the participant-specific AI recommendation before confirmation of eligibility and registration.
  • Concurrent anticancer treatment for another malignancy that would materially interfere with treatment selection or study outcome assessment.
  • Planned participation in another interventional study that dictates first-line systemic treatment or would interfere with study outcome assessment.
  • Inability to undergo protocol-required tumor imaging or follow-up assessments.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

Location

Study Officials

  • Zhao Huang

    Tongji Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The trial is open-label at the participant, care-provider, and site-investigator levels because the use of AI-assisted decision support cannot be concealed. However, de-identified imaging studies for the primary progression-free survival endpoint will be assessed by an independent central review committee blinded to cluster assignment, AI recommendations, treatment-selection rationale, and treating hospital and, where feasible, the treatment regimen received.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Twenty-six participating hospitals, each constituting one cluster, will be centrally randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the AI-assisted treatment-selection strategy or the usual-care treatment-selection strategy. The hospital, rather than the individual participant, is the unit of randomization. All eligible participants prospectively enrolled at a hospital will receive the treatment-selection strategy assigned to that hospital throughout the trial. Hospitals will not cross over between strategies.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2026

First Posted

July 27, 2026

Study Start

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Last Updated

July 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the primary publication and prespecified secondary publications, together with a data dictionary, will be made available through a controlled-access process. Direct identifiers and variables that could reasonably permit participant re-identification will be removed or recoded. Data sharing will be subject to participant consent, applicable ethics approvals, institutional agreements, and relevant data-protection requirements. Unrestricted public release of individual participant data or raw medical images is not planned.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will become available beginning 12 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for 5 years.
Access Criteria
Access may be granted to qualified researchers whose methodologically sound proposal has been approved by the study Data Access Committee. Requests must describe the research objectives, proposed analyses, investigator qualifications, data-security procedures, and applicable ethics approval. Approved researchers must sign a data-use agreement prohibiting participant re-identification, unauthorized redistribution, and use beyond the approved proposal. Data will be accessed through an institutionally approved secure data environment, subject to applicable legal and institutional requirements.

Locations