NCT07727525

Brief Summary

Mechanical low back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders among overweight adults and can lead to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Weakness of the core muscles may contribute to poor spinal stability and persistence of symptoms. Core strengthening exercises have been proposed as an effective treatment; however, evidence regarding their additional benefit over conventional physical therapy remains limited. This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of adding core strengthening exercises to conventional physical therapy in overweight adults with mechanical low back pain. Sixty participants aged 25-45 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² or greater and chronic mechanical low back pain lasting more than three months were randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group received core strengthening exercises (planks, side planks, and superman exercises) in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group received conventional physical therapy alone. Both groups also received therapeutic hot packs and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Participants attended three treatment sessions per week for six weeks. Primary outcomes included pain intensity measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and body fat percentage measured using the Jackson-Pollock skinfold method. Outcomes were assessed before and after the six-week intervention. The study evaluated whether adding core strengthening exercises to conventional physical therapy provides greater improvements in pain, disability, and body fat percentage in overweight adults with mechanical low back pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 11, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2023

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2026

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 10, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Mechanical Low Back PainCore StrengtheningOverweight AdultsSuperman ExerciseConventional Physical Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Lower scores indicate reduced pain intensity.

    Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

  • Functional Disability

    Functional disability will be measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is a validated questionnaire that evaluates disability associated with low back pain. Lower scores indicate better functional status.

    Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

  • Body Fat Percentage

    Body fat percentage will be measured using the Jackson-Pollock three-site skinfold method with skinfold calipers. Changes in body fat percentage will be compared before and after the intervention.

    Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group (Core Strengthening + Conventional Physical Therapy)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants assigned to the experimental arm received a combination of core strengthening exercises (plank, side plank, and superman exercises) together with conventional physical therapy exercises (bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation). All participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes. Treatment was provided three times per week for six weeks (18 sessions).

Procedure: Core Strengthening Exercise Program + Conventional Physical TherapyProcedure: Conventional Physical Therapy

Control Group (Conventional Physical Therapy)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants assigned to the control arm received conventional physical therapy consisting of bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation exercises. All participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes. Treatment was provided three times per week for six weeks (18 sessions).

Procedure: Core Strengthening Exercise Program + Conventional Physical TherapyProcedure: Conventional Physical Therapy

Interventions

Participants received a supervised exercise program consisting of core strengthening exercises (plank, side plank, and superman exercises) in addition to conventional physical therapy exercises (bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation). Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).

Control Group (Conventional Physical Therapy)Experimental Group (Core Strengthening + Conventional Physical Therapy)

Participants received conventional physical therapy consisting of bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation exercises. Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).

Control Group (Conventional Physical Therapy)Experimental Group (Core Strengthening + Conventional Physical Therapy)

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female participants. Age between 25 and 45 years. Diagnosed with chronic mechanical low back pain lasting more than 3 months. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² (overweight or obese). Body fat percentage \> 25%. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score \< 7 at baseline. Able and willing to provide written informed consent. Willing to participate in the complete 6-week intervention program.

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-mechanical low back pain. Acute low back pain. Previous lumbar spine surgery (e.g., laminectomy or discectomy). Spondylolisthesis. Osteoporosis or spinal fractures. Cauda equina syndrome. Current history of spinal trauma or surgery. Lumbar spine myelopathy. Diagnosed metabolic diseases. Neurological disorders affecting the spine or lower limbs. Any medical condition that would contraindicate participation in the exercise program.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Elite Physical Therapy Centre

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Dr Jawad Naveed, MS

    Riphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups. The experimental group received core strengthening exercises in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group received conventional physical therapy alone. Both groups were treated concurrently for six weeks, and outcomes were compared between groups at the end of the intervention.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2026

First Posted

July 27, 2026

Study Start

January 15, 2023

Primary Completion

May 11, 2023

Study Completion

June 30, 2023

Last Updated

July 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) collected during this study will not be shared. The informed consent obtained from participants did not include permission for public sharing of individual-level data, and no data-sharing plan was established at the time of study initiation. De-identified aggregate study results are reported in the thesis and may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding investigator, subject to institutional policies and ethical considerations.

Locations