Core Strengthening Effects in Low Back Pain in Overweight Adults
CORE-BACK
Effects of Core Strengthening on Mechanical Low Back Pain in Overweight Adults.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mechanical low back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders among overweight adults and can lead to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Weakness of the core muscles may contribute to poor spinal stability and persistence of symptoms. Core strengthening exercises have been proposed as an effective treatment; however, evidence regarding their additional benefit over conventional physical therapy remains limited. This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of adding core strengthening exercises to conventional physical therapy in overweight adults with mechanical low back pain. Sixty participants aged 25-45 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² or greater and chronic mechanical low back pain lasting more than three months were randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group received core strengthening exercises (planks, side planks, and superman exercises) in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group received conventional physical therapy alone. Both groups also received therapeutic hot packs and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Participants attended three treatment sessions per week for six weeks. Primary outcomes included pain intensity measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and body fat percentage measured using the Jackson-Pollock skinfold method. Outcomes were assessed before and after the six-week intervention. The study evaluated whether adding core strengthening exercises to conventional physical therapy provides greater improvements in pain, disability, and body fat percentage in overweight adults with mechanical low back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2026
CompletedJuly 27, 2026
July 1, 2026
4 months
July 10, 2026
July 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain Intensity
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Lower scores indicate reduced pain intensity.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Functional Disability
Functional disability will be measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is a validated questionnaire that evaluates disability associated with low back pain. Lower scores indicate better functional status.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Body Fat Percentage
Body fat percentage will be measured using the Jackson-Pollock three-site skinfold method with skinfold calipers. Changes in body fat percentage will be compared before and after the intervention.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group (Core Strengthening + Conventional Physical Therapy)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to the experimental arm received a combination of core strengthening exercises (plank, side plank, and superman exercises) together with conventional physical therapy exercises (bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation). All participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes. Treatment was provided three times per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Control Group (Conventional Physical Therapy)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants assigned to the control arm received conventional physical therapy consisting of bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation exercises. All participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes. Treatment was provided three times per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Interventions
Participants received a supervised exercise program consisting of core strengthening exercises (plank, side plank, and superman exercises) in addition to conventional physical therapy exercises (bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation). Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Participants received conventional physical therapy consisting of bridging, knee-to-chest, back extension, and pelvic rotation exercises. Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold. Participants also received a therapeutic hot pack and continuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 10 minutes before exercise. Treatment was provided three sessions per week for six weeks (18 sessions).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female participants. Age between 25 and 45 years. Diagnosed with chronic mechanical low back pain lasting more than 3 months. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² (overweight or obese). Body fat percentage \> 25%. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score \< 7 at baseline. Able and willing to provide written informed consent. Willing to participate in the complete 6-week intervention program.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-mechanical low back pain. Acute low back pain. Previous lumbar spine surgery (e.g., laminectomy or discectomy). Spondylolisthesis. Osteoporosis or spinal fractures. Cauda equina syndrome. Current history of spinal trauma or surgery. Lumbar spine myelopathy. Diagnosed metabolic diseases. Neurological disorders affecting the spine or lower limbs. Any medical condition that would contraindicate participation in the exercise program.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Elite Physical Therapy Centre
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Dr Jawad Naveed, MS
Riphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups. The experimental group received core strengthening exercises in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group received conventional physical therapy alone. Both groups were treated concurrently for six weeks, and outcomes were compared between groups at the end of the intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2026
First Posted
July 27, 2026
Study Start
January 15, 2023
Primary Completion
May 11, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
July 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) collected during this study will not be shared. The informed consent obtained from participants did not include permission for public sharing of individual-level data, and no data-sharing plan was established at the time of study initiation. De-identified aggregate study results are reported in the thesis and may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding investigator, subject to institutional policies and ethical considerations.