Evaluation of the Ileo-anal Pouch in FAP (ENDOPOL)
ENDOPOL
ENDOPOL: Dye chromoENDOscopy Versus Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Assessment of the Ileo-anal Pouch in Patients With Familial Adenomatous POLyposis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This international, multi-centre randomised controlled trial will compare dye-based chromoendoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy, using NBI/BLI, for adenoma detection during routine surveillance pouchoscopy in adults with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The estimated study duration is 2 years. Participants will undergo their usual scheduled pouchoscopy, performed by endoscopists experienced in FAP. Before the procedure, they will be randomised 1:1 to dye-based or virtual chromoendoscopy. Adenomas requiring endoscopic treatment will be removed during the same procedure according to standard practice. To our knowledge, no previous study has directly compared these techniques in this setting. Current guidelines recommend surveillance in patients with FAP and a pouch and permit dye-spray chromoendoscopy, but do not specify whether dye-based or virtual chromoendoscopy should be preferred. Practice varies between centres: virtual chromoendoscopy is commonly used at St Mark's Hospital, while some European centres primarily use dye-based chromoendoscopy. This study therefore aims to standardise practice and generate evidence to inform future surveillance strategies. Eligible patients will be adults aged ≥18 years with FAP, defined by a proven APC germline mutation or a clinical diagnosis of \>100 colorectal adenomas with a positive family history, and who have undergone IPAA after primary proctocolectomy or secondary proctectomy following IRA/ISA. Patients will be identified through routine endoscopy booking systems. Those who have consented to email communication from the Polyposis Registry team will receive a Participant Information Sheet in advance. They will be approached again on the day of their procedure, given the opportunity to ask questions, and consented before randomisation. Patients who do not consent will undergo their planned pouchoscopy as normal, without study randomisation. Patients lacking capacity to consent will not be approached. Randomisation will be performed using an independent computer-generated programme within Castor EDC, with allocation in a 1:1 ratio. Block randomisation will ensure balanced distribution between arms within each centre, and stratification by centre will account for differences in patient characteristics and local practice. Blinding is not feasible because dye-based and virtual chromoendoscopy have visually distinct appearances. During pouchoscopy, the pre-pouch ileum, pouch body and rectal cuff will be carefully inspected. In the dye-based arm, indigo carmine will be applied using a spray catheter before withdrawal and mucosal inspection. In the virtual chromoendoscopy arm, inspection will be performed using NBI/BLI according to local platform availability. The endoscope will be advanced to the pre-pouch ileum, followed by systematic withdrawal and spiral mucosal inspection. Lesions will be documented by size and location, including pouch body and rectal remnant/rectal cuff, using a polyp burden scoring table. Retroflexion will be performed to assess the rectal cuff. Polyp size will be estimated in millimetres, supported where appropriate by biopsy forceps of known size. Adenomas will be resected using standard polypectomy techniques where indicated, including polyps \>5 mm in the pouch body, \>2 mm in the rectal cuff, or lesions suspicious for high-grade dysplasia or early cancer. Because assessment of small polyps can vary between endoscopists, particularly for lesions \<5 mm, endoscopic images will be used to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for polyp burden and size. If reliability is acceptable, smaller polyps will be included and reported. Quality parameters will be collected for each procedure, including adjusted Boston Bowel Preparation Scale assessment for the pouch and total procedural time. Procedural time will include scope introduction, irrigation, dye application where applicable, withdrawal and inspection, retroflexion, and removal and retrieval of polyps. Post-procedure follow-up will follow routine care. Patients will be asked to monitor for adverse events after pouchoscopy and contact the hospital if needed. Future surveillance will be scheduled according to each centre's usual policy. Study data will be held in routine hospital systems accessible to the patient's usual clinical team and in a study file. Participants will be assigned a study number. No identifiable patient information will leave the Trust or be accessible to anyone outside the usual care team. Anonymised data will be entered into Castor EDC. Pseudonymised data will be transferred to the central study team at Amsterdam University Medical Center under an existing data transfer agreement for pooled analysis. The study does not expose participants to risks beyond routine surveillance pouchoscopy. There is no direct individual benefit but findings may benefit future patients with FAP and families by improving evidence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2031
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2031
July 24, 2026
July 1, 2026
5 years
July 10, 2026
July 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of clinically relevant adenomas greater than 5 mm in the ileo-anal pouch
Incidence of clinically relevant adenomas greater than 5 mm in the ileo-anal pouch comparing dye-based chromoendoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy using NBI/BLI
Periprocedural
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Incidence of advanced neoplasia in the pouch
Periprocedural
Incidence of adenomas measuring 2-4 mm, 5-9 mm and ≥10 mm
Periprocedural
Number of adenomas in the rectal remnant and anal mucosa
Periprocedural
InSiGHT Polyposis Staging System score
Periprocedural
Number of polypectomies performed
Periprocedural
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Chromoendoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORChromoendoscopy arm using dye spray
Virtual Chromoendoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORVirtual chromoendoscopy arm using narrow-band imaging (NBI)
Interventions
Virtual chromoendoscopy using narrow-band imaging (NBI)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ALL of the following:
- Diagnosis of FAP i.e., at least one of following:
- Genetic diagnosis: proven APC germline mutation OR
- Clinical diagnosis: \>100 colorectal adenomas in combination with a positive family history of FAP
- Have an ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), either after primary proctocolectomy or secondary proctectomy after initial colectomy and ileorectal or ileosigmoidal anastomosis (IRA/ISA)
- Age ≥ 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- ANY of the following
- Diagnosis of FAP i.e., at least one of following:
- Genetic diagnosis: proven APC germline mutation OR
- Clinical diagnosis: \>100 colorectal adenomas in combination with a positive family history of FAP
- Have an ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), either after primary proctocolectomy or secondary proctectomy after initial colectomy and ileorectal or ileosigmoidal anastomosis (IRA/ISA)
- Age ≥ 18 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St Mark's Hospital Polyposis Registry (St Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer)
London, London, N10 7NS, United Kingdom
Related Publications (11)
Wang L, Mannalithara A, Singh G, Ladabaum U. Low Rates of Gastrointestinal and Non-Gastrointestinal Complications for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopies in a Population-Based Study. Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):540-555.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
PMID: 29031502BACKGROUNDLai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PMID: 19136102BACKGROUNDLynch PM, Morris JS, Wen S, Advani SM, Ross W, Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas M, Raju GS, Ricciardiello L, Iwama T, Rossi BM, Pellise M, Stoffel E, Wise PE, Bertario L, Saunders B, Burt R, Belluzzi A, Ahnen D, Matsubara N, Bulow S, Jespersen N, Clark SK, Erdman SH, Markowitz AJ, Bernstein I, De Haas N, Syngal S, Moeslein G. A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):115-125.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PMID: 26769407BACKGROUNDHuneburg R, Heling D, Kaczmarek DJ, van Heteren P, Olthaus M, Fimmers R, Berger M, Coch C, Lau JF, Kristiansen G, Weismuller TJ, Spier I, Aretz S, Strassburg CP, Nattermann J. Dye chromoendoscopy leads to a higher adenoma detection in the duodenum and stomach in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1308-E1314. doi: 10.1055/a-1220-6699. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
PMID: 33015332BACKGROUNDHurley JJ, Thomas LE, Walton SJ, Thomas-Gibson S, Haycock A, Suzuki N, Mort M, Williams G, Morgan M, Clark SK, Sampson JR, Dolwani S. The impact of chromoendoscopy for surveillance of the duodenum in patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):665-673. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2347. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
PMID: 29702101BACKGROUNDDekker E, Boparai KS, Poley JW, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Offerhaus GJ, Kuipers EJ, Fockens P, Dees J. High resolution endoscopy and the additional value of chromoendoscopy in the evaluation of duodenal adenomatosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy. 2009 Aug;41(8):666-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214980. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
PMID: 19670132BACKGROUNDvan Leerdam ME, Roos VH, van Hooft JE, Dekker E, Jover R, Kaminski MF, Latchford A, Neumann H, Pellise M, Saurin JC, Tanis PJ, Wagner A, Balaguer F, Ricciardiello L. Endoscopic management of polyposis syndromes: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2019 Sep;51(9):877-895. doi: 10.1055/a-0965-0605. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
PMID: 31342472BACKGROUNDPasquer A, Benech N, Pioche M, Breton A, Rivory J, Vinet O, Poncet G, Saurin JC. Prophylactic colectomy and rectal preservation in FAP: systematic endoscopic follow-up and adenoma destruction changes natural history of polyposis. Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jul;9(7):E1014-E1022. doi: 10.1055/a-1467-6257. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PMID: 34222624BACKGROUNDFriederich P, de Jong AE, Mathus-Vliegen LM, Dekker E, Krieken HH, Dees J, Nagengast FM, Vasen HF. Risk of developing adenomas and carcinomas in the ileal pouch in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Nov;6(11):1237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
PMID: 18848811BACKGROUNDTajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V, Tanaka T, Ishihara M, Yamao K. Risk of ileal pouch neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 28;19(40):6774-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6774.
PMID: 24187452BACKGROUNDTudyka VN, Clark SK. Surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25(3):201-206.
PMID: 24714154BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andre Latchford, MBBS PhD FRCP
LONDON NORTH WEST UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2026
First Posted
July 24, 2026
Study Start
July 9, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 9, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 9, 2031
Last Updated
July 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be made openly available because the study involves a relatively small and potentially identifiable clinical population. Even after de-identification, there may remain a residual risk of re-identification when clinical, demographic, procedural and outcome data are combined. In addition, participants will have consented for their data to be used for the purposes of this study and related ethically approved analyses, rather than for unrestricted external sharing. Requests for access to anonymised aggregate data or specific analyses may be considered by the study team on a case-by-case basis, subject to appropriate ethical, governance and data-sharing approvals.