Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Pre-Endoscopic Prediction of Montreal Disease Extent (E1/E2/E3) in Ulcerative Colitis Using Symptoms, Signs, and Laboratory Tests: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study
1 other identifier
observational
1,500
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This multicenter retrospective observational study aims to develop and externally validate a machine learning model that predicts Montreal ulcerative colitis (UC) disease extent (E1: limited/proctitis; E2: left-sided; E3: extensive) using pre-endoscopic clinical information, including symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests. The model is intended to assist clinical assessment before endoscopic confirmation and is not designed to replace colonoscopy or histopathology. Data from development centers (Centers A and B) will be used for model development with nested cross-validation; data from independent external centers (Centers C and D) will be used for external validation only.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
ExpectedJuly 23, 2026
July 1, 2026
10.7 years
July 19, 2026
July 19, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Macro one-vs-rest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (macro AUC-OVR) for three-class Montreal extent prediction (E1 vs E2 vs E3) in the external validation cohort (n=247).
At index visit / endoscopic assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with UC from four hospitals in China (2020-2025). Development cohort: Centers A (Dongfang Hospital, BUCM) and B (Dongzhimen Hospital, BUCM). External validation cohort: Centers C (BUCM Third Affiliated Hospital) and D (Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine).
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis by endoscopy ± histopathology.
- Montreal disease extent classifiable as E1 (limited), E2 (intermediate/left-sided), or E3 (extensive) and mapped to study labels 1/2/3.
- Pre-endoscopic baseline data available: demographics, symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests used as model predictors.
- Predictors collected before or independent of endoscopic findings used for the outcome label (endoscopic extent not used as input).
- One index visit per patient (duplicate/non-index visits excluded).
You may not qualify if:
- Non-UC diagnosis or Montreal extent not assignable.
- Missing patient identifier/linkage or unlabelable outcome.
- Incomplete endoscopic gold standard for Montreal extent classification.
- Duplicate or non-index visits.
- Critical predictor data unavailable and not handled by the prespecified modeling pipeline
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2026
First Posted
July 23, 2026
Study Start
November 20, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Due to the restrictions of the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), patients were only consented for the use of their data in this specific clinical prediction model study. Broad data sharing was not covered in the original ethical approval, and obtaining re-consent from all 247 participants is not feasible.