Feasibility of Velocity Loss-Based Volume Prescription During Constant-Load and Chain-Based Smith Machine Back Squats
1 other identifier
observational
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study was to evaluate the feasibility of percentage of velocity loss (%VL)-based approaches for prescribing training volume during constant-load and chain-based Smith machine back squats. The study aimed to answer whether %VL can be expressed as the maximum number of repetitions (%Rep) in constant-load and chain-based Smith machine squats. Twenty-six resistance-trained men performed repetitions-to-failure tests under variable (VRT) and constant resistance training (CRT). The %Rep attained before reaching different levels of effort were compared between VRT and CRT across various loads and sessions. Furthermore, this study evaluated the influence of different factors on the predictive accuracy of the %Rep-%VL relationships. These findings will provide evidence-based evidence in prescribing and monitoring intra-set volume.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2026
CompletedJuly 22, 2026
July 1, 2026
3 months
July 15, 2026
July 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The %Rep attained before reaching the 10%, 20%, and 30% VL thresholds
The %Rep attained before reaching the 10%, 20%, and 30% VL thresholds was recorded across all loads, sessions, and loading configurations.
April 1st, 2026
The %rep predictive accuracy
To assess predictive accuracy, second-order polynomial regression equations were generated from the first session of each loading configuration using all repetitions within a set, setting %Rep as the dependent variable and %VL as the independent variable. These equations were constructed using different regression types (individual vs. general), load specificities (load-specific vs. multiple-load), and loading configurations (CRT vs. VRT). During the second session, the actual %VL recorded after reaching the 10%, 20%, and 30% VL thresholds was substituted into the corresponding first-session equations to derive the predicted %Rep. Then, the absolute estimation error was calculated as (\|actual %Rep - predicted %Rep\|). In cases where muscular failure occurred before a specific %VL threshold was reached (e.g., 30% VL), the %VL of the final completed repetition was recorded, and the corresponding actual %Rep was defined as 100%.
April 1st, 2026
Interventions
Participants initially completed a standardized general warm-up and a specific warm-up. The specific warm-up protocol included 3 repetitions at approximately 40% 1RM, 2 repetitions at 65% 1RM, and 1 repetition at 90% 1RM using constant-load to ensure adequate neuromuscular activation for the subsequent testing sets. After a 3-minute rest, participants performed three sets to momentary muscular failure with 40% of total external loads provided by chains. To minimize fatigue from higher-repetition sets influencing the repetitions completed in subsequent loads, the loads were not tested in a randomized order. Instead, participants performed the tests in a descending order of 85%, 75%, and 65% 1RM.
Participants initially completed a standardized general warm-up and a specific warm-up. The specific warm-up protocol included 3 repetitions at approximately 40% 1RM, 2 repetitions at 65% 1RM, and 1 repetition at 90% 1RM using constant-load to ensure adequate neuromuscular activation for the subsequent testing sets. After a 3-minute rest, participants performed three sets to momentary muscular failure with 0% of total external loads provided by chains. To minimize fatigue from higher-repetition sets influencing the repetitions completed in subsequent loads, the loads were not tested in a randomized order. Instead, participants performed the tests in a descending order of 85%, 75%, and 65% 1RM.
Eligibility Criteria
Participant characteristics (mean ± standard deviation \[range\]) included: age, 20.4 ± 2.1 (18-25) years; body height, 1.78 ± 0.05 (1.68-1.87) m; body mass, 71.7 ± 7.5 (60.0-91.4) kg; training experience, 3.5 ± 1.8 (1-10) years; and constant-load 1RM, 135.4 ± 17.4 (95-163) kg, corresponding to 1.89 ± 0.21 (1.58-2.28) times body mass.
You may qualify if:
- at least 1 year of resistance training experience, performing back squats at least once per week.
- proficiency in the Smith machine back squat executed at maximal intended velocity.
- a constant-load 1RM of ≥ 1.5 times their body mass.
- no reported musculoskeletal injuries in the past three months.
You may not qualify if:
- Voluntary withdrawal or injury.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China normal university
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2026
First Posted
July 22, 2026
Study Start
October 7, 2025
Primary Completion
January 10, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Individual participant data and supporting documents will become available after publication of the study results and will remain available for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared in anonymized form with qualified researchers for scientific purposes. The shared data will include lifting velocity of each repetition completed.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.