Bone Level Changes Using Clear Aligners Compared to Fixed Appliances in Non-Extraction Treatment of Adults
Evaluation of Bone Level Changes Using Clear Aligners Compared to Fixed Appliances in Non-extraction Treatment of Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares two common ways of straightening teeth in adults who have mild-to-moderate crowding of the lower front teeth and do not need any teeth removed: clear aligners and traditional fixed braces. The main aim is to find out whether the two methods differ in how they affect the bone that surrounds the teeth. Using three-dimensional X-ray scans (cone-beam CT) and digital models of the teeth taken before and during treatment, the researchers measure the level and thickness of the bone around the lower front teeth, the tilt (inclination) of the lower front teeth, and how quickly the crowding is corrected. Adults are randomly assigned to receive either clear aligners or fixed braces, and the same measurements are compared between the two groups over about six months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2026
CompletedJuly 21, 2026
July 1, 2026
11 months
July 15, 2026
July 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in alveolar bone level
Change (mm) in the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the alveolar crest on the labial and lingual aspects of the mandibular central incisors, lateral incisors and canines, measured on CBCT (OnDemand software), calculated as the difference between baseline and end-of-alignment values.
Baseline (T0) and end of alignment phase (T3)) (approximately 6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in alveolar bone thickness
Baseline (T0) and end of alignment phase (≈ 6 months)
Change in mandibular incisor inclination (torque)
Baseline (T0) and end of alignment phase (≈ 6 months)
Rate of alignment (Little's Irregularity Index)
Baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), 16 weeks (T2) and end of alignment (T3, ≈ 24 weeks / 6 months)
Study Arms (2)
Fixed appliances (Group FA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional pre-adjusted edgewise fixed appliance (0.022-inch slot, MBT prescription) bonded from first molar to first molar; levelling and alignment with a sequence of nickel-titanium and stainless-steel archwires over approximately six months.
Clear aligners (Group CA)
EXPERIMENTALThree-dimensionally printed, thermoformed clear aligners with bonded attachments and interproximal reduction as indicated; worn \~22 hours/day and changed per the digital staging, with clinical review every four weeks over approximately six months
Interventions
Brackets bonded first-molar-to-first-molar; alignment sequence 0.014" NiTi → 0.016" NiTi → 0.016 × 0.022" NiTi → 0.017 × 0.025" stainless steel. Interproximal reduction performed on assigned contacts where indicated.
Digital intraoral scan and staging (3Shape Ortho Analyzer); 3D-printed models thermoformed into aligners; attachments bonded where planned; sequential aligners worn \~22 h/day. Interproximal reduction per contact from canine-to-canine is done.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 18-25 years of age, of both sexes.
- Mild-to-moderate mandibular anterior crowding (2-6 mm).
- Angle Class I molar relationship with normal overjet (1-3 mm) and overbite (1-2 mm).
- Full permanent dentition with a healthy periodontium.
- Normal anteroposterior and vertical skeletal pattern.
You may not qualify if:
- Any local or systemic condition, or trauma, capable of affecting craniofacial growth and development.
- History of previous orthodontic or interceptive treatment.
- Loss of periodontal attachment.
- Craniofacial anomalies, facial asymmetry or skeletal discrepancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt (Department of Orthodontics)
Cairo, 11865, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ahmed mohamed hesham elzoghary
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and care providers cannot be masked because the two appliances are visibly different. All CBCT and digital-model measurements are performed by independent outcome assessors blinded to group allocation, and the statistician analyses coded data.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Postgraduate researcher (orthodontic resident), Department of Orthodontics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2026
First Posted
July 21, 2026
Study Start
August 15, 2024
Primary Completion
July 25, 2025
Study Completion
April 15, 2026
Last Updated
July 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07