Comparing Pre-Anesthetic Approaches in Dentistry
Comparison of Pre-Anesthetic Approaches to Reduce Needle Insertion Pain Before Dental Local Anesthesia.
1 other identifier
interventional
192
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to find out which pre-treatment method works best to reduce pain from dental anesthesia injections in adult patients. Researchers will compare four different approaches: Topical numbing spray (10% lidocaine) Brief cold application (cryotherapy) A combination of both cold application and cooled numbing spray A control group Participants who need a standard local anesthesia injection for their dental treatment will be randomly assigned to one of these four groups. Right after the needle insertion, participants will rate their pain level using a simple visual scale, and their physical reactions will also be observed and scored by the researchers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2026
CompletedJuly 14, 2026
July 1, 2026
4 months
July 8, 2026
July 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity during initial needle insertion (VAS)
Subjective pain levels will be assessed by participants using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 mm. Higher scores indicate greater pain.
During the initial local anesthesia needle insertion.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Objective pain assessment using Sound-Eye-Motor (SEM) scale
During the initial local anesthesia needle insertion.
Study Arms (4)
Topical Anesthetic Spray
EXPERIMENTALApplication of 10% lidocaine spray to the oral mucosa before local anesthesia.
Cryotherapy
EXPERIMENTALApplication of an ice pen to the oral mucosa for 60 seconds before local anesthesia.
Combination Arm Type: Experimental
EXPERIMENTALApplication of an ice pen for 60 seconds followed by 10% lidocaine spray before local anesthesia.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONStandard local anesthesia injection without any pre-anesthetic intervention.
Interventions
Topical application of 10% lidocaine spray to reduce injection pain.
Pre-cooling the injection site using an ice pen for 60 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged between 18 and 65 years. Systemically healthy individuals classified as ASA I or II. Patients presenting to the Harran University Faculty of Dentistry Hospital who require local anesthesia during dental treatment. Treatment plan requiring mandibular block anesthesia, anterior/posterior infiltration, or palatal infiltration. No regular use of analgesics (NSAIDs, paracetamol, etc.) within the last 7 days. No history of allergy to cold application or topical anesthetics.
You may not qualify if:
- Regular use of analgesics (NSAIDs, paracetamol, etc.) within the last 7 days. Chronic pain syndrome, migraine, or systemic diseases requiring continuous use of analgesics. Pregnancy or lactation. Presence of active lesions in the oral mucosa, severe periodontal infection, or pathology at the injection site. History of allergy to topical gel or cold application. Psychiatric disorders or conditions preventing compliance with dental treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Harran University Faculty of Dentristry,Departman of Endodonti
Sanliurfa, Outside of the US, 63300, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
1. Chandrasekaran, J., et al., Efficacy of painless injection technique-Vibraject-Clinical trial in Chennai, India. 2014. 2. Kumar, M., R. Chawla, and M. Goyal, Topical anesthesia. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 2015. 31(4): p. 450-456. 3. Ghaderi, F., S. Banakar, and S. Rostami, Effect of pre-cooling injection site on pain perception in pediatric dentistry:"A randomized clinical trial". Dental research journal, 2013. 10(6): p. 790. 4. Aminabadi, N.A. and R.M.Z. Farahani, The effect of pre-cooling the injection site on pediatric pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia. The journal of contemporary dental practice, 2012. 10: p. 43-50. 5. Lakshmanan, L. and V. Ravindran, Efficacy of cryotherapy application on the pain perception during intraoral injection: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2021. 14(5): p. 616. 6. Wiswall, A.T., Palatal anesthesia: comparison of four techniques for decreasing injection discomfort. 2011.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2026
First Posted
July 14, 2026
Study Start
February 23, 2026
Primary Completion
July 1, 2026
Study Completion
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to maintain patient confidentiality and privacy, in strict accordance with the informed consent form approved by the local ethics committee.