NCT07702240

Brief Summary

This study compares two anesthesia medications, esketamine and sufentanil, used together with propofol during ERCP procedures. The goal is to find out which combination provides better safety and comfort for people undergoing ERCP. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either esketamine or sufentanil during sedation. Researchers will monitor blood oxygen levels, blood pressure, and recovery time during and after the procedure to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
530

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
19mo left

Started Jul 2026

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress4%
Jul 2026Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 10, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 14, 2026

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 10, 2028

Last Updated

July 14, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

July 3, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)Procedural Sedation and AnalgesiaEsketamineSufentanilPropofolRandomized Controlled TrialFrail Patients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia

    Hypoxemia is defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) \< 90% lasting ≥ 10 seconds. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were recorded at six predefined time points: T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5.

    Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of intraoperative hypotension

    Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.

Other Outcomes (8)

  • induction time

    During anesthesia induction

  • Recovery time

    From the end of the procedure to recovery from sedation

  • Patient body movements

    Throughout the procedure

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Esketamine arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive intravenous esketamine in combination with propofol for procedural sedation during ERCP. Esketamine is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation, while propofol is continuously infused and titrated according to clinical sedation requirements.

Drug: Esketamine

Sufentanil arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive intravenous sufentanil in combination with propofol for procedural sedation during ERCP. Sufentanil is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation, while propofol is continuously infused and titrated according to clinical sedation requirements.

Drug: Sufentanil

Interventions

Intravenous esketamine is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation for ERCP. It is used in combination with continuously infused propofol, with dosing titrated to achieve adequate procedural sedation. This regimen differs from the comparator arm in that esketamine is used as the primary analgesic agent instead of an opioid.

Esketamine arm

Intravenous sufentanil is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation for ERCP. It is used in combination with continuously infused propofol, with dosing titrated to achieve adequate procedural sedation. This regimen differs from the comparator arm in that sufentanil is used as the opioid-based analgesic instead of esketamine.

Sufentanil arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged ≥18 years
  • Patients scheduled to undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 30 kg/m²
  • Patients requiring sedation for ERCP
  • Ability to provide written informed consent voluntarily

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy or contraindication to propofol, esketamine, sufentanil, or related medications
  • Severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg)
  • Severe dysfunction of the heart, lungs, liver, or kidneys
  • History of central nervous system disorders or psychiatric disorders
  • Anticipated difficult airway
  • History of psychiatric disorders or contraindications to ketamine use
  • Inability to communicate or provide informed consent
  • Requirement for general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation or intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia with intubation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Biliary Tract DiseasesAgnosia

Interventions

EsketamineSufentanil

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System DiseasesPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FentanylPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Central Study Contacts

Tingting Fan, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Due to pharmacodynamic differences between study drugs, the anesthesiologist may infer treatment allocation based on patients' physiological responses; therefore, strict double-blinding is not feasible in this study. To minimize potential bias, allocation concealment and assessor blinding are implemented. Outcome data are collected and evaluated by study personnel who are not involved in anesthesia administration.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Attending Anesthesiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2026

First Posted

July 14, 2026

Study Start

July 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 10, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 10, 2028

Last Updated

July 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share