Appropriateness of Hemostatic Agent Use in Cardiovascular Surgery (HAEMOVAX)
HAEMOVAX
Evaluation of Appropriateness in the Use of Hemostatic Agents in Cardiovascular Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Single-Center Observational Study
1 other identifier
observational
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hemostatic agents are widely used in cardiac and vascular surgery to support intraoperative bleeding control. Despite their clinical relevance and substantial economic impact, little is known about real-world patterns of use, adherence to evidence-based recommendations, and the alignment between clinicians' perceived knowledge and actual decision-making. HAEMOVAX is a single-center mixed-methods observational study conducted at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Milan, Italy. The study combines an anonymous survey of cardiovascular surgeons with a retrospective audit of institutional hemostatic agent consumption. The primary objective is to evaluate the appropriateness of hemostatic agent selection using a Knowledge-Practice Alignment Score (KPA-Score) derived from standardized clinical vignettes based on current EACTS and ESA recommendations. Secondary objectives include assessment of usage patterns, barriers to appropriate use, concordance between declared practice and real-world consumption, and opportunities for evidence-based standardization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jul 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2026
ExpectedJuly 13, 2026
July 1, 2026
15 days
June 23, 2026
July 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of participants achieving a Knowledge-Practice Alignment Score (KPA-Score) ≥60%
The Knowledge-Practice Alignment Score (KPA-Score) is a study-defined measure representing the percentage of guideline-concordant responses across five standardized clinical vignettes assessing hemostatic agent selection. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater concordance with current European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) recommendations. The reported outcome is the percentage of participants achieving a KPA-Score of at least 60%.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Self-perceived knowledge of hemostatic agent selection
Baseline
Knowledge-Practice Alignment Score (KPA-Score)
Baseline
Correlation between self-perceived knowledge and Knowledge-Practice Alignment Score
Baseline
Concordance between declared and actual hemostatic agent use
baseline
Distribution of hemostatic agent selection across standardized clinical vignettes
Baseline
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Hemostatic agents usage assessment cohort
Single cohort including all cardiovascular surgery personnel (cardiac and vascular surgeons, consultants and trainees) at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio participating in a cross-sectional survey and linked institutional retrospective audit of hemostatic agent utilization.
Interventions
Cross-sectional structured survey assessing knowledge-practice alignment in the use of hemostatic agents, combined with retrospective institutional audit of product consumption. No therapeutic or experimental intervention is administered.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population includes all cardiovascular surgery staff (cardiac and vascular surgeons, including attending surgeons and residents) employed at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan. Participation is voluntary and anonymous. The study uses a census sampling approach, targeting the entire eligible professional population within the institution. No patient-level participants are included.
You may qualify if:
- Physicians with a surgical role in the Departments of Cardiac Surgery or Vascular Surgery at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan Including attending surgeons, consultant surgeons, and surgical residents
- Active participation in cardiovascular operative procedures during the study period (or within the preceding 12 months)
- Employment at the study institution at the time of survey administration Willingness to participate and complete the anonymous structured questionnaire
You may not qualify if:
- Non-surgical healthcare personnel (e.g., nurses, anesthesiologists, administrative staff, or allied health professionals)
- Surgeons not involved in operative cardiovascular practice during the study period
- External collaborators or visiting surgeons without regular clinical activity at the institution
- Individuals who do not provide informed consent for participation in the anonymous survey
- Questionnaires with missing or incomplete vignette responses preventing calculation of the KPA-Score
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IRCCS Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio Hospital
Milan, MI, 20157, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2026
First Posted
July 13, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion
July 16, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Last Updated
July 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared, as the study involves an anonymous cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals and aggregated institutional audit data without patient-level datasets.