NCT07693361

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, retrospective observational study comparing the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted versus endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with node-positive breast cancer. The study aims to evaluate the protective effect on the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and quality of life between the two minimally invasive techniques, as well as to assess long-term oncological outcomes including axillary recurrence and survival. Data will be extracted from routine clinical records. The study will compare the robotic group and the endoscopic group with respect to the following outcome measures:

  1. 1.ICBN-related sensory outcomes: incidence of sensory impairment (light touch, pinprick, cold, and warm sensations) in four key regions innervated by the ICBN (medial upper arm, axilla, lateral chest wall, and upper chest wall) assessed using standardized bedside sensory testing and sensory scoring systems;
  2. 2.Perioperative outcomes: including but not limited to operative time, estimated blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, length of hospital stay, drainage duration and axillary neurotomy;
  3. 3.Postoperative complications: including but not limited to seroma, hematoma, wound infection, lymphedema, and shoulder dysfunction;
  4. 4.Pain and functional outcomes: including but not limited to postoperative pain assessed by the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), upper limb function assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and quality of life assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast + 4 (FACT B+4) questionnaire;
  5. 5.Oncological outcomes: including but not limited to axillary recurrence, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), with a minimum follow-up period to be determined based on data availability.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
127

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
21mo left

Started Oct 2021

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress73%
Oct 2021May 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2021

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2025

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2026

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2026

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2028

Expected
Last Updated

July 9, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

June 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

breast canceraxillary lymph node dissectionintercostobrachial nerveRobotic-Assisted SurgeryEndoscopic-Assisted SurgeryQuality of Lifesensory function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of Sensory Impairment in Intercostobrachial Nerve Innervated Regions

    Sensory function assessed in four key regions innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN): medial upper arm, axilla, lateral chest wall, and upper chest wall. Four sensory modalities are evaluated using standardized bedside sensory testing: light touch, pinprick, cold sensation, and warm sensation. The evaluation of sensory impairment includes the following dimensions: (1) type of sensory impairment (e.g., hypoesthesia, hyperesthesia, paresthesia, or anesthesia); (2) location of impairment (specific ICBN-innervated regions affected); (3) extent/area of impairment (measured as the involved surface area within each region); and (4) proportion of impairment (the percentage of patients with sensory impairment in each region and modality). These sensory outcomes are compared between the robotic-assisted and endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection groups.

    At postoperative follow-up assessments (e.g., 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, with additional long-term follow-up based on data availability)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Quality of Life Assessed by Cancer Therapy - Breast + 4

    At postoperative follow-up visits (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, with additional long-term follow-up based on data availability)

  • Upper Limb Function Assessed by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scores

    At postoperative follow-up visits (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, with additional long-term follow-up based on data availability)

  • Postoperative Complications

    Within 30 days post-surgery and at long-term follow-up assessments

  • Recurrence and Metastasis Events

    Up to 5 years post-surgery, with follow-up duration based on data availability from routine clinical records

  • Survival Outcomes

    Up to 5 years post-surgery, with follow-up duration based on data availability from routine clinical records

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

R-ALND

Participants with breast cancer who underwent robotic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection.

E-ALND

Participants with breast cancer who underwent endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with breast cancer who underwent either robotic-assisted or endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection at the Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery Center, Guangzhou Medical University Affiliated Women and Children's Medical Center and Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital.

You may qualify if:

  • pathologically confirmed breast cancer;
  • clinical N1-N3 stage or confirmation of lymph node metastasis by intraoperative frozen pathology;
  • Enlarged lymph nodes without significant adhesion to the axillary vessels or nerves;
  • Ability to comprehend the research questions;
  • Provision of informed consent and cooperation with the investigation;
  • No history or current diagnosis of mental illness or impaired consciousness;
  • ECOG PS 0-1.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients without lymph node metastasis;
  • Patients who refuse surgery;
  • Breast cancer patients with cognitive impairment, altered mental status, or inability to clearly express their feelings;
  • Critically ill patients;
  • Patients with other malignant tumors or severe medical conditions that render them unable to tolerate surgery.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital

Foshan, Guangdong, China

Location

Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2026

First Posted

July 9, 2026

Study Start

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Last Updated

July 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared due to the retrospective nature of this study and concerns regarding patient privacy and confidentiality. The data were extracted from routine clinical records under a waiver of informed consent granted by the ethics committee, and the original consent forms did not include provisions for data sharing with external researchers. Therefore, IPD sharing is not planned. However, summarized data and analytical codes may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional and ethical approval.

Locations