NCT07683143

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate a nurse-led intervention program based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model to improve health-promoting behaviors and quality of life in elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It will also learn about the program's effects on self-efficacy and relevant objective clinical indicators. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the IMB-based nurse-led intervention improve health-promoting behaviors in elderly PCI patients? What effects does the intervention have on patients' self-efficacy, quality of life, and objective clinical indicators? Researchers will compare the nurse-led IMB-based intervention to usual care to see if the program effectively enhances health-promoting behaviors and quality of life. Participants will: Receive the IMB-based nurse-led intervention or usual care Be followed up for a specified period with regular assessments Complete questionnaires on health-promoting behaviors, self-efficacy, and quality of life at baseline and at designated time points post-intervention Have objective clinical indicators measured and recorded

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 20, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 20, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 6, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 6, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II

    The Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II cocomprises six dimensions with a total of 52 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, yielding a total score ranging from 52 to 208, with higher scores indicating better health-promoting behaviors. Total scores of 52-91 indicate a poor level of health-promoting lifestyle, 92-131 indicate a moderate level, 132-171 indicate a good level, and 172-208 indicate an excellent level.

    From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Cardiac Self-Efficacy Scale

    From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention

  • Seattle Angina Questionnaire

    From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention

  • Blood Pressure

    From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention

  • Fasting Blood Glucose

    From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention

  • Six-Minute Walk Test

    From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Nurse-led intervention

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

The intervention group received a nurse-led IMB-based program plus standard care, delivered by an eight-member team from surgery to 4 weeks post-discharge. Information: In-hospital sessions (10-15 min) with teach-back, group peer support, a discharge handbook, and weekly phone/video follow-ups. Motivation: Three in-hospital motivational interviewing sessions (15-20 min) plus weekly post-discharge calls to enhance intrinsic motivation and family involvement. Behavioral Skills: Hands-on training via demos, simulations, and role-playing (15-20 min) with real-time feedback, discharge review, and post-discharge dynamic adjustments. Core Content: Six domains-health responsibility, nutrition, physical activity, stress management, interpersonal relations, and spiritual growth-each integrating IMB components.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • a confirmed diagnosis of coronary heart disease with a stable condition following PCI
  • age ≥60 years
  • normal cognitive and communication abilities
  • provision of written informed consent and voluntary participation in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • severe concomitant diseases affecting vital organs (e.g., liver, brain, or kidneys)
  • current participation in other similar studies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Huaihe Hospital of Henan University

Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice[M]. Stamford: Appleton and Lange, 1996.

    BACKGROUND
  • Huang Z, Chair SY. Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led common-sense model of self-regulation-based heart failure self-care program. BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02722-9.

  • Davis KM, Eckert MC, Hutchinson A, Harmon J, Sharplin G, Shakib S, Caughey GE. Effectiveness of nurse-led services for people with chronic disease in achieving an outcome of continuity of care at the primary-secondary healthcare interface: A quantitative systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103986. Epub 2021 May 27.

  • Karam M, Chouinard MC, Poitras ME, Couturier Y, Vedel I, Grgurevic N, Hudon C. Nursing Care Coordination for Patients with Complex Needs in Primary Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Int J Integr Care. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):16. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5518.

  • Xiao L, Wang P, Fang Q, Zhao Q. Health-promoting Lifestyle in Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Korean Circ J. 2018 Jun;48(6):507-515. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0312.

  • Wu J, Feng Y, Zhao Y, Guo Z, Liu R, Zeng X, Yang F, Liu B, Gu J, Tarimo CS, Shao W, Guo X, Li Q, Zhao L, Ma M, Shen Z, Zhao Q, Miao Y. Lifestyle behaviors and risk of cardiovascular disease and prognosis among individuals with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 71 prospective cohort studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 22;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01586-7.

  • Liu M, He X, Yang X, et al. Interpretation of Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2023. Chin J Cardiovasc Med. 2024;29(04):305-324.

    RESULT
  • Fan G, Liu Q, Bi J et al. Association of ideal cardiovascular health behaviors with arterial stiffness and its progression: a cross-sectional and short-term follow-up study among physical examinees. Chin J Public Health. 2024;40(03):315-319.

    RESULT
  • Wang L, Niu JY, Zhao ZY, Li M, Xu M, Lu JL, Wang TG, Chen YH, Wang SY, Dai M, Li L, Liu SS, Wang WQ, Xu Y, Bi YF. Ideal Cardiovascular Health is Inversely Associated with Subclinical Atherosclerosis: A Prospective Analysis. Biomed Environ Sci. 2019 Apr;32(4):260-271. doi: 10.3967/bes2019.036.

  • Du R, Wang P, Ma L, Larcher LM, Wang T, Chen C. Health-related quality of life and associated factors in patients with myocardial infarction after returning to work: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 17;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01447-4.

  • Yun JY, Yun YH. Health-promoting behavior to enhance perceived meaning and control of life in chronic disease patients with role limitations and depressive symptoms: a network approach. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 24;13(1):4848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31867-3.

  • Alonso Salinas GL, Cepas-Guillen P, Leon AM, Jimenez-Mendez C, Lozano-Vicario L, Martinez-Avial M, Diez-Villanueva P. The Impact of Geriatric Conditions in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 25;13(7):1891. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071891.

  • Tao S, Sun S, Wu S, Peng T, Cao L, Yan M, Ma J, Li H. Current status and influencing factors of health literacy among older adults in combined medical and nursing care institutions: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;11:1323335. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1323335. eCollection 2023.

  • Sverre E, Peersen K, Weedon-Fekjaer H, Perk J, Gjertsen E, Husebye E, Gullestad L, Dammen T, Otterstad JE, Munkhaugen J. Preventable clinical and psychosocial factors predicted two out of three recurrent cardiovascular events in a coronary population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01368-6.

  • Wu C, Zheng Y, Zhang T, Liu M, Xian L, Xu Y. Incidence and Influencing Factors of In-Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Sep;106(3):1682-1699. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31711. Epub 2025 Jul 1.

  • Zhao T, Wu Z, Wang H, et al. Analysis of risk factors and nursing for recurrent acute myocardial infarction after PCI. Nurs Res Pract. 2025;22(01):69-75.

    RESULT
  • Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks 2023 Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2023. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Dec 2;86(22):2167-2243. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.015. Epub 2025 Sep 24.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2026

First Posted

July 6, 2026

Study Start

May 2, 2025

Primary Completion

November 20, 2025

Study Completion

November 20, 2025

Last Updated

July 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD from this study will not be shared due to ethical, legal, and practical reasons. Patient privacy is paramount; even de-identified data pose re-identification risks. Informed consent does not cover external data sharing. The behavioral intervention data are context-specific and may be misinterpreted outside this setting. Institutional policies and intellectual property rights restrict access to intervention materials. Secondary analyses without oversight risk erroneous conclusions. Resource constraints also limit data preparation. For these reasons, IPD will not be shared.

Locations