A Nurse-Led Program to Improve Patient Health Promotion Behaviors Among Elderly Patients After PCI
Construction And Application Of An IMB Model-Based Health-Promoting Behavior Intervention Program For Elderly Patients With Coronary Heart Disease After PCI
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate a nurse-led intervention program based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model to improve health-promoting behaviors and quality of life in elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It will also learn about the program's effects on self-efficacy and relevant objective clinical indicators. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the IMB-based nurse-led intervention improve health-promoting behaviors in elderly PCI patients? What effects does the intervention have on patients' self-efficacy, quality of life, and objective clinical indicators? Researchers will compare the nurse-led IMB-based intervention to usual care to see if the program effectively enhances health-promoting behaviors and quality of life. Participants will: Receive the IMB-based nurse-led intervention or usual care Be followed up for a specified period with regular assessments Complete questionnaires on health-promoting behaviors, self-efficacy, and quality of life at baseline and at designated time points post-intervention Have objective clinical indicators measured and recorded
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2026
CompletedJuly 6, 2026
June 1, 2026
7 months
June 24, 2026
July 2, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II
The Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II cocomprises six dimensions with a total of 52 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, yielding a total score ranging from 52 to 208, with higher scores indicating better health-promoting behaviors. Total scores of 52-91 indicate a poor level of health-promoting lifestyle, 92-131 indicate a moderate level, 132-171 indicate a good level, and 172-208 indicate an excellent level.
From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Cardiac Self-Efficacy Scale
From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention
Seattle Angina Questionnaire
From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention
Blood Pressure
From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention
Fasting Blood Glucose
From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention
Six-Minute Walk Test
From enrollment to 3 months post-intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALControl group
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
The intervention group received a nurse-led IMB-based program plus standard care, delivered by an eight-member team from surgery to 4 weeks post-discharge. Information: In-hospital sessions (10-15 min) with teach-back, group peer support, a discharge handbook, and weekly phone/video follow-ups. Motivation: Three in-hospital motivational interviewing sessions (15-20 min) plus weekly post-discharge calls to enhance intrinsic motivation and family involvement. Behavioral Skills: Hands-on training via demos, simulations, and role-playing (15-20 min) with real-time feedback, discharge review, and post-discharge dynamic adjustments. Core Content: Six domains-health responsibility, nutrition, physical activity, stress management, interpersonal relations, and spiritual growth-each integrating IMB components.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a confirmed diagnosis of coronary heart disease with a stable condition following PCI
- age ≥60 years
- normal cognitive and communication abilities
- provision of written informed consent and voluntary participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- severe concomitant diseases affecting vital organs (e.g., liver, brain, or kidneys)
- current participation in other similar studies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Henan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
Related Publications (17)
Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice[M]. Stamford: Appleton and Lange, 1996.
BACKGROUNDHuang Z, Chair SY. Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led common-sense model of self-regulation-based heart failure self-care program. BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02722-9.
PMID: 39849430RESULTDavis KM, Eckert MC, Hutchinson A, Harmon J, Sharplin G, Shakib S, Caughey GE. Effectiveness of nurse-led services for people with chronic disease in achieving an outcome of continuity of care at the primary-secondary healthcare interface: A quantitative systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103986. Epub 2021 May 27.
PMID: 34242979RESULTKaram M, Chouinard MC, Poitras ME, Couturier Y, Vedel I, Grgurevic N, Hudon C. Nursing Care Coordination for Patients with Complex Needs in Primary Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Int J Integr Care. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):16. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5518.
PMID: 33776605RESULTXiao L, Wang P, Fang Q, Zhao Q. Health-promoting Lifestyle in Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Korean Circ J. 2018 Jun;48(6):507-515. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0312.
PMID: 29856145RESULTWu J, Feng Y, Zhao Y, Guo Z, Liu R, Zeng X, Yang F, Liu B, Gu J, Tarimo CS, Shao W, Guo X, Li Q, Zhao L, Ma M, Shen Z, Zhao Q, Miao Y. Lifestyle behaviors and risk of cardiovascular disease and prognosis among individuals with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 71 prospective cohort studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 22;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01586-7.
PMID: 38650004RESULTLiu M, He X, Yang X, et al. Interpretation of Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2023. Chin J Cardiovasc Med. 2024;29(04):305-324.
RESULTFan G, Liu Q, Bi J et al. Association of ideal cardiovascular health behaviors with arterial stiffness and its progression: a cross-sectional and short-term follow-up study among physical examinees. Chin J Public Health. 2024;40(03):315-319.
RESULTWang L, Niu JY, Zhao ZY, Li M, Xu M, Lu JL, Wang TG, Chen YH, Wang SY, Dai M, Li L, Liu SS, Wang WQ, Xu Y, Bi YF. Ideal Cardiovascular Health is Inversely Associated with Subclinical Atherosclerosis: A Prospective Analysis. Biomed Environ Sci. 2019 Apr;32(4):260-271. doi: 10.3967/bes2019.036.
PMID: 31217062RESULTDu R, Wang P, Ma L, Larcher LM, Wang T, Chen C. Health-related quality of life and associated factors in patients with myocardial infarction after returning to work: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 17;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01447-4.
PMID: 32552846RESULTYun JY, Yun YH. Health-promoting behavior to enhance perceived meaning and control of life in chronic disease patients with role limitations and depressive symptoms: a network approach. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 24;13(1):4848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31867-3.
PMID: 36964273RESULTAlonso Salinas GL, Cepas-Guillen P, Leon AM, Jimenez-Mendez C, Lozano-Vicario L, Martinez-Avial M, Diez-Villanueva P. The Impact of Geriatric Conditions in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 25;13(7):1891. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071891.
PMID: 38610656RESULTTao S, Sun S, Wu S, Peng T, Cao L, Yan M, Ma J, Li H. Current status and influencing factors of health literacy among older adults in combined medical and nursing care institutions: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;11:1323335. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1323335. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38292383RESULTSverre E, Peersen K, Weedon-Fekjaer H, Perk J, Gjertsen E, Husebye E, Gullestad L, Dammen T, Otterstad JE, Munkhaugen J. Preventable clinical and psychosocial factors predicted two out of three recurrent cardiovascular events in a coronary population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01368-6.
PMID: 32024471RESULTWu C, Zheng Y, Zhang T, Liu M, Xian L, Xu Y. Incidence and Influencing Factors of In-Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Sep;106(3):1682-1699. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31711. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
PMID: 40598759RESULTZhao T, Wu Z, Wang H, et al. Analysis of risk factors and nursing for recurrent acute myocardial infarction after PCI. Nurs Res Pract. 2025;22(01):69-75.
RESULTGlobal Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks 2023 Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2023. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Dec 2;86(22):2167-2243. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.015. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
PMID: 40990886RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2026
First Posted
July 6, 2026
Study Start
May 2, 2025
Primary Completion
November 20, 2025
Study Completion
November 20, 2025
Last Updated
July 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD from this study will not be shared due to ethical, legal, and practical reasons. Patient privacy is paramount; even de-identified data pose re-identification risks. Informed consent does not cover external data sharing. The behavioral intervention data are context-specific and may be misinterpreted outside this setting. Institutional policies and intellectual property rights restrict access to intervention materials. Secondary analyses without oversight risk erroneous conclusions. Resource constraints also limit data preparation. For these reasons, IPD will not be shared.