Effects of Custom Fitted Supportive Socks With Integrated Insoles in Individuals With Flat Feet
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test if wearing custom-fitted supportive socks with built-in insoles, along with a foot exercise program, can improve foot posture, The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether wearing custom-fitted supportive socks with built-in insoles, along with a foot exercise program, can improve foot posture, walking ability, and foot comfort in children aged five to twelve years with flexible flat feet. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does the use of supportive socks with insoles and exercises improve foot posture and the shape of the foot arch? Does this combined approach improve walking ability and overall foot comfort? Researchers will compare children who wear supportive socks with built-in insoles and perform exercises to children who perform the same exercise program without the supportive socks to see which approach is more effective. Participants will: Wear the assigned supportive socks for 6-8 hours each day during daily activities if allocated to the socks group. Perform foot exercises with a physical therapist for six weeks. Take part in assessments of foot posture, walking ability, and foot comfort at the start and after six weeks Data collection is currently in progress. The findings of this study may help support non-surgical treatment options for children with flexible flat feet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 25, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2026
CompletedJuly 2, 2026
May 1, 2025
9 months
June 26, 2026
June 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Navicular Drop Test (NDT)
The Navicular Drop Test assesses postural alignment by measuring the height difference of the navicular bone between the non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions. It evaluates medial arch collapse and foot pronation. Higher values = greater navicular drop → poorer postural alignment / more pronation, Lower value = better arch stability.
Baseline
Navicular Drop Test (NDT)
The Navicular Drop Test assesses postural alignment by measuring the height difference of the navicular bone between the non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions. It evaluates medial arch collapse and foot pronation. Higher values = greater navicular drop → poorer postural alignment / more pronation, Lower value = better arch stability.
6 weeks after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle (MLAA)
Baseline
Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle (MLAA)
6 weeks after intervention
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Baseline
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
6 weeks after intervention
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Baseline
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Insoles with Comprehensive Exercise
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group received custom-fitted supportive socks with integrated insoles in combination with a supervised comprehensive exercise program. The intervention lasted for 6 weeks, with comprehensive exercises. Insoles were worn for 8 to 10 hours daily.
Comprehensive Exercise Only
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group received only the comprehensive exercise program, identical in content and supervision to the intervention group and lasted for 6 weeks but without the insoles or supportive socks.
Interventions
Participants in the intervention group received custom-fitted supportive socks with integrated insoles in addition to a comprehensive foot exercise program. The supportive socks were tailored to individual foot measurements and included insole aimed at correcting postural alignment, functional mobility and improving foot health.
Participants received a structured comprehensive exercise program targeting foot intrinsic muscle strengthening, stretching, balance training, and functional mobility. The program duration was 6 weeks and did not include the use of insoles or supportive socks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 5 to 12 years
- Both Gender.
- With Flexible flat feet.
- Positive navicular drop test
- Positive too many toes test, toe raising test and medial longitudinal arch angle
You may not qualify if:
- Any congenital deformity of the lower limb
- Any recent injuries
- Any recent surgeries
- Any neurological deficit
- Body Mass Index (BMI)≥25
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zayneb Hospital
Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan
Related Publications (3)
Bac A, Kaczor S, Pasiut S, Scislowska-Czarnecka A, Jankowicz-Szymanska A, Filar-Mierzwa K. The influence of myofascial release on pain and selected indicators of flat foot in adults: a controlled randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 26;12(1):1414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05401-w.
PMID: 35082352BACKGROUNDElsayed W, Alotaibi S, Shaheen A, Farouk M, Farrag A. The combined effect of short foot exercises and orthosis in symptomatic flexible flatfoot: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):396-405. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07846-2. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
PMID: 36988565BACKGROUNDBrijwasi T, Borkar P. A comprehensive exercise program improves foot alignment in people with flexible flat foot: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2023 Jan;69(1):42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2022.11.011. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
PMID: 36526555BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single-blind design: The outcome assessor was blinded to the group allocation to reduce measurement bias. Participants were not blinded due to the nature of the intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2026
First Posted
July 2, 2026
Study Start
May 5, 2025
Primary Completion
January 25, 2026
Study Completion
January 25, 2026
Last Updated
July 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-05