NCT07679425

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted to investigate any significant effect of pneumatic compression on diaphragmatic excursion in patients with low back dysfunction .

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Jul 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress21%
Jul 2026Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 25, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2026

Expected
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

July 1, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 25, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Diaphragmatic excursion

    Ultrasonography is an ideal tool and easy to be operated for evaluating diaphragm function. Low thickening ratio at forced respiration is an early indicator of diaphragm dysfunction and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients. These findings suggest that routine screening for diaphragm dysfunction is in HD patients and intervention of diaphragm dysfunction is expected to be a novel strategy for improving the clinical outcomes in HD patients.

    12 weeks

  • Pain intensity

    Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain intensity. it is 10 centimeter line with 2 ends; 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain.

    12 weeks

  • functional capacity

    The 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. The patient will rest comfortably for 10 minutes prior to the test. During this time blood pressure and heart rate are measured and potential contraindications assessed. The 6MWT will be performed on the walking track in which is 30 meters on one lap and two small cones will be used to mark the walking track boundaries.

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Functional disability

    12 weeks

  • Health-related Quality of life

    12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Pneumatic compression and inspiratory muscle Trainer group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive resisted inspiratory exercises using pneumatic compression abdominal belt in addition to inspiratory muscle Trainer (3 sessions per week) for 12 weeks

Device: Pneumatic compression deviceDevice: Inspiratory muscle Trainer

Inspiratory muscle Trainer group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive only training of the inspiratory muscles by (Threshold Inspiratory Muscle Trainer) (3 sessions per week) for 12 weeks

Device: Inspiratory muscle Trainer

Interventions

Training program in the form of resisted inspiratory exercises using pneumatic compression device with abdominal sleeve on the top portion of the abdominal cavity beneath the xiphoid process. The patient used a pursed-lip breathing method to exhale after inhaling slowly through the nose such that the stomach slid out against the abdominal sleeve of the device. For 12 weeks, three times per week, the workout consisted of 10 sets with 4-5 breaths in each set and a rest period of 2-3 minutes.

Pneumatic compression and inspiratory muscle Trainer group

the subject underwent training in the form of six sets of five deep breaths against the trainer, with 1-2 minutes of rest in between sessions. Depending on their rate of perceived exertion, the patient determined the maximum training load at which they could effectively perform 10 breaths at maximum resistance. A load equivalent to 30% of the patient's maximum inspiratory effort was used to begin the training .This unique load gradually increased as the inspiratory muscle got stronger. At the conclusion of the three months, the training programmer had expanded by 5% to 10% per week, reaching 60% of the maximum inspiratory pressure.

Inspiratory muscle Trainer groupPneumatic compression and inspiratory muscle Trainer group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients have been on regular hemodialysis (three sessions a week) at least 6 months before the start of the study
  • Patients 'Age between 40 and 60 years old
  • Patients have not participated in any physical activity program at least 6 months before the start of the study
  • Patients have chronic back pain \> 3months
  • Patients has non specific low back pain
  • Body mass index (BMI) from 25 to 34.9 kg/m2.
  • Patients are clinically and medically stable

You may not qualify if:

  • Instability of patient's medical condition
  • Patients with chest infection
  • Inability to comprehend and follow instructions as in dementia or speech problems such as dysphasia,
  • uncontrolled diabetes mellitus,
  • Persistent systolic Blood Pressure (BP) greater than 200 mmHg, persistent diastolic BP greater than 120 mmHg
  • Chronic lung disease which result in significant oxygen desaturation on exercise or pulmonary congestion
  • Patients with lupus nephritis.
  • Patients with Spondylodiscitis , Compression fracture, Spinal stenosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hagar Atif Azab

Cairo, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Equipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Hany Saeed, As Professor

    Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Heba Abd Elghafar, As professor

    Cairo University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Hagar Azab, Master

CONTACT

Shimaa Ali, As professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2026

First Posted

July 1, 2026

Study Start

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

July 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Locations