MMG vs. EMG for Cortical Breach Detection
Prospective Evaluation of Mechanomyography Versus Triggered Electromyography for Intraoperative Assessment of Cortical Breaches During Instrumented Lumbar Spine Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine how well mechanomyography (MMG) and electromyography (EMG) prevent cortical bone breaches, or the pinching of a nerve from screw placement, in patients having lower back surgery requiring hardware. Both MMG and EMG are devices approved by the FDA to detect the location of nerves during surgery so they can be avoided. The results from both tests will be compared to one another to determine if one is better at accurately locating nerves than the other.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 6, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 19, 2025
CompletedAugust 19, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.9 years
April 22, 2022
June 27, 2025
August 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success of Pedicle Screw Trajectories
Patients with successful pedicle screw trajectories determined by the percentage of patients with A/B or C/D/E breaches. * Grade A - No cortical breach (0 mm) * Grade B - Pedicle cortical breach \< 2 mm * Grade C - Pedicle cortical breach = 2 to \< 4 mm * Grade D - Pedicle cortical breach = 4 to \< 6 mm * Grade E - Pedicle cortical breach = 6 mm
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Questionnaire for Pain.
3 months after surgery
Change From Baseline in the Oswestry Disability Index Version 2.1A
3 months after surgery
Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Global-10
3 months after surgery
Change in the Short-From (SF-36) Health Survey
6 weeks and 3 months after surgery
Hospital Readmission at 30 Days
30 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Intraoperative MMG vs EMG for cortical breach detection
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will be assessed with both MMG and EMG during their lower spine fusion surgery.
Interventions
Triggered electromyography will be used during surgery to detect nerve impingement by pedicle screws used for spinal fusion. Threshold stimulation data from the device will be recorded.
SENTIO MMG ball tip probe will be used during surgery to detect nerve impingement by pedicle screws used for spinal fusion. Threshold stimulation data from the device will be recorded, and the accuracy compared to the data from the triggered electromyography.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- scheduled to undergo a one-, two-, or three-level posterolateral spinal fusion surgery using Depuy Synthes Expedium pedicle screw instrumentation.
- over the age of 18 years old
- unresponsive to conservative care for a minimum of 6 months
- psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully consent and comply with this protocol
You may not qualify if:
- preexisting medical condition or comorbidity that makes them a poor candidate
- open wound local to the operative area, or rapid joint disease, bone absorption, or osteoporosis
- requires medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing
- active local or systemic infection
- metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity
- implanted pacemaker
- morbidly obese, defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 45
- osteoporosis
- involved in or planning to engage in litigation or receiving Workers Compensation related to neck or back pain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Francis Farhadilead
- DePuy Synthescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Francis Farhadi
- Organization
- University of Kentucky
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
H. Francis Farhadi, MD, PhD
University of Kentucky
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2022
First Posted
April 28, 2022
Study Start
August 2, 2022
Primary Completion
July 9, 2024
Study Completion
November 6, 2024
Last Updated
August 19, 2025
Results First Posted
August 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share