World Sight Foundation Field Machine (WSFFM) Pilot
WSFFM
Clinical Testing Pilot of the World Sight Foundation Field Machine (WSFFM) in Glaucoma Patients - Comparison With Humphrey Visual Field Analyser
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The current situation outside of large cities in lower-income countries, as described above, is suboptimal for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Doctors have no means of assessing visual fields, and as such may not be able to identify the condition until too advanced for any meaningful intervention (ie, to enable preservation of vision). Vision loss from glaucoma is irreversible. Understanding, through this pilot study, how well the World Sight Foundation Field Machine (WSFFM) works is an essential step towards trialling its use in lower-income countries. The justification for enabling this is to allow clinicians in the developing world to make more informed assessments of their glaucoma patient's status; this should translate in more timely treatments or referral for further investigation before further irreversible vision loss. The WSFFM will be compared to the Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) analyser. The HVF analyser is the gold standard method of measuring visual fields; in our hospital eye service it is almost exclusively the method used, and as such the field technicians are particularly skilled in their use. The output data of the HVF enables easy quantification of level of field loss; by comparing the output from the WSFFM it would be possible to allow some form of quantification against "the standard" such that an idea of how well it works may be calculated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 29, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
CompletedJune 29, 2026
June 1, 2026
2 months
September 9, 2025
June 25, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Validation of the WSFFM - comparing the visual field testing obtained with WSFFM and HVF analyser.
Comparison of visual field measurements obtained using the World Sight Foundation Field Machine (WSFFM) and the Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) analyser. Unit of Measure: Quantitative visual field parameters (e.g., mean deviation or equivalent summary metric, as applicable)
Day 1
Feasibility of using the WSFFM in a "real-life" setting
Description: Patient-reported ease of performing the WSFFM test using a numeric rating scale. Unit of Measure: Score on a 1-10 scale (1 = very difficult, 10 = very easy)
Day 1
Validation of the WSFFM - comparing the visual field testing obtained with WSFFM and HVF analyser.
Description: Patient-reported comparison of ease of use between WSFFM and HVF testing. Unit of Measure: Ordinal or categorical comparison (e.g., WSFFM easier / same / HVF easier)
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quantitative data obtained from the mean (and standard deviation) of patient reported acceptability and ease of testing on a sliding scale of 0-10; compared with HVF score using Students t-test.
Day 1
Qualitative data obtained from patient reported outcomes in relation to their experience of visual field testing using the WSFFM.
Day 1
The mean time taken to complete WSFFM testing, compared to the mean time for HVF analyser testing, using paired Student's t-test to provide quantitative data
Day 1
Field technician qualitative data regarding ease of use, collected over time after each clinical session.
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
World Sight Foundation Field Machine
EXPERIMENTALTest Device
Humphrey Visual Field Analyser
ACTIVE COMPARATORgold standard of care comparator
Interventions
Gold Standard of Care (Comparator)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients attending glaucoma outpatient clinic
- Patients requiring visual field testing, with plan for "SITA-STANDARD" HVF testing
- Patients 18 years or older and of any gender
- Patients capable of giving informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Patients not requiring visual field testing on that outpatient clinic attendance.
- Patients requiring visual field testing, with plan for "SITA-FAST" or "SITA-FASTER" HVF testing.
- Patients who do not attend their outpatient clinic appointment,
- Patients not able to perform visual field testing (for example due to their visual acuity, physical difficulty in positioning for test duration, or cognitive difficulties in understanding instructions).
- Patients under the age of 18 years old.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Aylesbury, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2025
First Posted
June 29, 2026
Study Start
April 29, 2026
Primary Completion
July 1, 2026
Study Completion
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06