NCT07674069

Brief Summary

The current situation outside of large cities in lower-income countries, as described above, is suboptimal for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Doctors have no means of assessing visual fields, and as such may not be able to identify the condition until too advanced for any meaningful intervention (ie, to enable preservation of vision). Vision loss from glaucoma is irreversible. Understanding, through this pilot study, how well the World Sight Foundation Field Machine (WSFFM) works is an essential step towards trialling its use in lower-income countries. The justification for enabling this is to allow clinicians in the developing world to make more informed assessments of their glaucoma patient's status; this should translate in more timely treatments or referral for further investigation before further irreversible vision loss. The WSFFM will be compared to the Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) analyser. The HVF analyser is the gold standard method of measuring visual fields; in our hospital eye service it is almost exclusively the method used, and as such the field technicians are particularly skilled in their use. The output data of the HVF enables easy quantification of level of field loss; by comparing the output from the WSFFM it would be possible to allow some form of quantification against "the standard" such that an idea of how well it works may be calculated.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 9, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 29, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 29, 2026

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 29, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 9, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 25, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Validation of the WSFFM - comparing the visual field testing obtained with WSFFM and HVF analyser.

    Comparison of visual field measurements obtained using the World Sight Foundation Field Machine (WSFFM) and the Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) analyser. Unit of Measure: Quantitative visual field parameters (e.g., mean deviation or equivalent summary metric, as applicable)

    Day 1

  • Feasibility of using the WSFFM in a "real-life" setting

    Description: Patient-reported ease of performing the WSFFM test using a numeric rating scale. Unit of Measure: Score on a 1-10 scale (1 = very difficult, 10 = very easy)

    Day 1

  • Validation of the WSFFM - comparing the visual field testing obtained with WSFFM and HVF analyser.

    Description: Patient-reported comparison of ease of use between WSFFM and HVF testing. Unit of Measure: Ordinal or categorical comparison (e.g., WSFFM easier / same / HVF easier)

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Quantitative data obtained from the mean (and standard deviation) of patient reported acceptability and ease of testing on a sliding scale of 0-10; compared with HVF score using Students t-test.

    Day 1

  • Qualitative data obtained from patient reported outcomes in relation to their experience of visual field testing using the WSFFM.

    Day 1

  • The mean time taken to complete WSFFM testing, compared to the mean time for HVF analyser testing, using paired Student's t-test to provide quantitative data

    Day 1

  • Field technician qualitative data regarding ease of use, collected over time after each clinical session.

    Day 1

Study Arms (2)

World Sight Foundation Field Machine

EXPERIMENTAL

Test Device

Device: World Sight Foundation Field Machine

Humphrey Visual Field Analyser

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

gold standard of care comparator

Other: Comparator

Interventions

Test Intervention

World Sight Foundation Field Machine

Gold Standard of Care (Comparator)

Also known as: Humphrey Visual Field Analyser
Humphrey Visual Field Analyser

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- Patients attending glaucoma outpatient clinic
  • Patients requiring visual field testing, with plan for "SITA-STANDARD" HVF testing
  • Patients 18 years or older and of any gender
  • Patients capable of giving informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Patients not requiring visual field testing on that outpatient clinic attendance.
  • Patients requiring visual field testing, with plan for "SITA-FAST" or "SITA-FASTER" HVF testing.
  • Patients who do not attend their outpatient clinic appointment,
  • Patients not able to perform visual field testing (for example due to their visual acuity, physical difficulty in positioning for test duration, or cognitive difficulties in understanding instructions).
  • Patients under the age of 18 years old.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust

Aylesbury, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2025

First Posted

June 29, 2026

Study Start

April 29, 2026

Primary Completion

July 1, 2026

Study Completion

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

June 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Locations