Standardized Patients in Arterial Pressure Monitoring Training
The Effect of Using Standardized Patients in Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring Training on Cognitive Load, Clinical Skills, and Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
74
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of using standardized patients versus static manikins in nursing education for arterial blood pressure monitoring and stabilization training. The primary objective is to investigate the impact of these two different simulation methods on students' cognitive load, clinical skills, and self-efficacy levels. Arterial pressure monitoring is a critical, invasive intervention commonly performed in intensive care units and operating rooms, requiring a high degree of precision. While traditional technical skill assessments usually focus solely on procedural success scores or completion speed, this study utilizes the framework of Cognitive Load Theory to examine the mental toll (intrinsic, extrinsic, and germane load) and psychological readiness (self-efficacy) experienced by nursing students during the procedure. The study will be conducted as a randomized controlled experimental trial with 3rd-year nursing students who have successfully completed their Medical-Surgical Nursing course. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group: The Experimental Group will receive theoretical and practical training, followed by performing the arterial pressure monitoring line stabilization on a "Standardized Patient" (an experienced healthcare professional acting a scenario with a moving limb to mimic real clinical chaos without any actual invasive intervention). The Control Group will receive the same training but will perform the stabilization procedure on a traditional static medical manikin. Data will be collected using a Descriptive Information and Performance Recording Form (to measure procedural time and error rates), the Cognitive Load Scale, and the Self-Efficacy Scale for Clinical Skills. Measurements will be taken at baseline (pre-test) and immediately after the intervention (post-test). The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence-based guidance for developing "mind-friendly" nursing curricula and safer, more realistic simulation protocols that enhance student self-efficacy while ensuring patient safety before entering actual clinical environments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
June 26, 2026
June 1, 2026
1 month
June 16, 2026
June 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cognitive Load Level
Assessed using a standardized Cognitive Load Scale (or Cognitive Load Questionnaire). This scale measures the mental effort and cognitive burden experienced by students during the arterial pressure monitoring stabilization procedure. The total score ranges from a minimum score to a maximum score \[10 to 100\]. Higher scores indicate a higher level of cognitive load and mental fatigue during the clinical task.
Within the same day, immediately after the completion of the simulation procedure (Day 1)
Clinical Self-Efficacy Level
Assessed using a standardized Clinical Self-Efficacy Scale to measure nursing students' self-confidence and perceived competence regarding invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring and line stabilization. The total score ranges from a minimum score to a maximum score \[5 to 25\]. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy and clinical confidence.
Within the same day, immediately after the completion of the simulation procedure (Day 1).
Study Arms (2)
Standardized Patient Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive standard theoretical and practical training on invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring and line stabilization. Following the training, students will perform the arterial pressure monitoring line stabilization procedure on a Standardized Patient (SP). The SP will be depicted by an experienced cardiovascular surgery nurse who will simulate a restless clinical scenario by moving their limb at predetermined intervals and with a standard intensity. No actual invasive cannulation will be performed; instead, a pre-fixed cannula appearance will be established on the SP's radial region. Cognitive load and clinical self-efficacy scales will be administered as pre-tests before the training and as post-tests immediately after the simulation procedure. Procedural time and technical errors will also be recorded.
Static Manikin Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive the exact same standard theoretical and practical training on invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring and line stabilization. Following the training, students will perform the identical line stabilization procedure on a traditional, static medical manikin in the nursing laboratory setup. Unlike the experimental group, the manikin will remain completely stationary, representing the traditional simulation approach. Cognitive load and clinical self-efficacy scales will be administered as pre-tests before the training and as post-tests immediately after the manikin procedure. Procedural time and technical errors will be recorded simultaneously by the researchers.
Interventions
This behavioural intervention consists of an advanced simulation session following standard theoretical and practical training.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being a undergraduate nursing student currently enrolled in the specified nursing department/faculty.
- Volunteering to participate in the study and providing written informed consent.
- Taking the relevant clinical nursing course for the first time.
- Having successfully completed the baseline theoretical lectures related to vital signs and basic invasive procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Having prior formal clinical experience or advanced training regarding invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring or line stabilization.
- Having a known physical or visual impairment that would prevent the participant from performing psychomotor simulation tasks.
- Repeating the academic year or the clinical course due to prior failure. --Withdrawing from the study voluntarily or failing to attend the mandatory 45-minute baseline theoretical training session.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Babadag K, Zaybak A. Comparing Intra-Arterial, Auscultatory, and Oscillometric Measurement Methods for Arterial Blood Pressure. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2021 May 11;29(2):194-202. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2021.19103. eCollection 2021 Jun.
PMID: 34263238BACKGROUNDTsang R. Hemodynamic monitoring in the cardiac intensive care unit. Congenit Heart Dis. 2013 Nov-Dec;8(6):568-75. doi: 10.1111/chd.12148. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
PMID: 24168451BACKGROUNDTucker D, Hazinski MF. The nursing perspective on monitoring hemodynamics and oxygen transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;12(4 Suppl):S72-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182211d5b.
PMID: 22129554BACKGROUNDBronicki RA. Hemodynamic Monitoring. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;17(8 Suppl 1):S207-14. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000779.
PMID: 27490601BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2026
First Posted
June 26, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
October 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share