NCT07664293

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the eGMS designed by FEMH with the usual insulin ordering protocol in the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous insulin therapy in ordinary ward.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable type-2-diabetes

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 12, 2023

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 23, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 23, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2026

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

eGlycemic Management Systemin hospital hyperglycemiaSubcutaneous basal bolus insulin protocol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the mean percent of glucose readings between 140 and 180 mg/dL per patient

    Calculated for each patient and averaged across all eligible patients in each study arm

    through study completion, an average of 7 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Glycemic control: patient day weighted mean glucose

    through study completion, an average of 7 days

  • Patient safety: proportion of patient-days with any glucose reading <70 mg/dL, <54 mg/dL, and >300 mg/dL

    through study completion, an average of 7 days

Study Arms (2)

FEMH Electronic Glucose Management System (FEMH-eGMS)

EXPERIMENTAL

An EMR-integrated clinical decision support tool that automatically retrieves demographic, dietary, antidiabetic medication, comorbidity (ICD-coded hypoglycemia risk factors), laboratory, and glucose data directly from the hospital electronic medical record without manual entry. The system computes a recommended total daily subcutaneous insulin dose using a weight- and HbA1c-adjusted algorithm, partitioned into 50% basal (long-acting) and 50% prandial (rapid-acting, divided across three meals), with a correction-dose component for premeal hyperglycemia. Dose recommendations are continuously updated as new clinical data become available. The treating physician reviews each recommendation before order entry.

Device: FEMH Electronic Glucose Management System (FEMH-eGMS)

Conventional Basal-Bolus Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the control group received insulin injection therapy according to the usual insulin ordering protocol;

Procedure: Control group

Interventions

Control groupPROCEDURE

Patients in the control group received insulin injection therapy according to the usual insulin ordering protocol

Conventional Basal-Bolus Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol

Inpatient blood glucose control of patients in the interventional group received the dose of insulin injection therapy by suggestion of eGMS.

FEMH Electronic Glucose Management System (FEMH-eGMS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 20 years
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Required four-times-daily subcutaneous basal-bolus insulin during admission
  • At least two point-of-care glucose readings \>180 mg/dL during admission

You may not qualify if:

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Pregnancy
  • Gestational diabetes
  • Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state or diabetic ketoacidosis at admission
  • Total parenteral nutrition
  • Treatment with intravenous insulin infusion (insulin pump)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Far Eastern Memory Hospital

New Taipei City, 220, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Maynard G, Lee J, Phillips G, Fink E, Renvall M. Improved inpatient use of basal insulin, reduced hypoglycemia, and improved glycemic control: effect of structured subcutaneous insulin orders and an insulin management algorithm. J Hosp Med. 2009 Jan;4(1):3-15. doi: 10.1002/jhm.391.

    PMID: 19140173BACKGROUND
  • Wexler DJ, Shrader P, Burns SM, Cagliero E. Effectiveness of a computerized insulin order template in general medical inpatients with type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct;33(10):2181-3. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0964. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

  • Schnipper JL, Liang CL, Ndumele CD, Pendergrass ML. Effects of a computerized order set on the inpatient management of hyperglycemia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Endocr Pract. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):209-18. doi: 10.4158/EP09262.OR.

  • Neubauer KM, Mader JK, Holl B, Aberer F, Donsa K, Augustin T, Schaupp L, Spat S, Beck P, Fruhwald FM, Schnedl C, Rosenkranz AR, Lumenta DB, Kamolz LP, Plank J, Pieber TR. Standardized Glycemic Management with a Computerized Workflow and Decision Support System for Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Different Wards. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Oct;17(10):685-92. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0027. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

  • Sinha Gregory N, Seley JJ, Gerber LM, Tang C, Brillon D. Decreased rates of hypoglycemia following implementation of a comprehensive computerized insulin order set and titration algorithm in the inpatient setting. Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Dec;44(5):260-265. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1250603. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Patients in the same ward will be randomly assigned by computer in a ratio of 1:1 to the interventional group or the control group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 1. This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted in the ordinary ward of the Department of Metabolism, Integrative Medicine and General Medicine. Patients in the same ward will be randomly assigned by computer in a ratio of 1:1 to the interventional group or the control group. 2. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be referred by the attending physician, and then study P.I. or researcher will explain the trial method, and the research will be carried out after obtaining the patient's consent in writing. The patient does not know that he is assigned to which group. 3. Patients in the control group received insulin injection therapy according to the usual insulin ordering protocol; 4. Inpatient blood glucose control of patients in the interventional group received the dose of insulin injection therapy by suggestion of eGMS.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2026

First Posted

June 24, 2026

Study Start

April 12, 2023

Primary Completion

April 23, 2026

Study Completion

April 23, 2026

Last Updated

June 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
Time Frame
starting in January 2027

Locations