High-Flow Nasal Cannula After Extubation in Acute Brain Injury
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Brain Injury: A Propensity-Score Overlap-Weighted Observational Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
285
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with acute brain injury after neurosurgery are at increased risk of extubation failure after removal of the endotracheal tube. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) may provide better post-extubation respiratory support than conventional oxygen therapy (COT), but evidence in post-neurosurgical patients remains limited. This prospective observational study evaluated adult post-neurosurgical patients with acute brain injury who underwent planned extubation in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit of Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam. Patients received either HFNC or COT after extubation according to routine clinical practice and the decision of the attending ICU physicians. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as reintubation or escalation of respiratory support within 5 days after extubation. Secondary outcomes included tracheostomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ICU length of stay, total duration of mechanical ventilation, and time from extubation to reintubation. Propensity score matching was used to reduce baseline imbalance between groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2026
CompletedJune 23, 2026
May 1, 2026
12 months
June 14, 2026
June 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients with treatment failure within 5 days after planned extubation
Treatment failure was defined as reintubation or escalation of respiratory support after planned extubation. Escalation of respiratory support included the need for non-invasive ventilation, rescue high-flow nasal cannula therapy in the conventional oxygen therapy group, or other clinically indicated escalation due to respiratory deterioration. Outcome assessment was based on bedside clinical monitoring, arterial blood gas analysis, respiratory status, neurological status, airway protection assessment, and ICU medical record review.
Within 5 days after planned extubation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of patients requiring tracheostomy during ICU stay
From planned extubation through ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days after planned extubation
Incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia during ICU stay
From planned extubation through ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days after planned extubation
Length of stay in the intensive care unit
From ICU admission through ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days after ICU admission
Time from planned extubation to reintubation
From planned extubation through reintubation, assessed up to 5 days after planned extubation
Study Arms (2)
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Group
Patients who received high-flow nasal cannula immediately after planned extubation according to routine clinical practice and the attending ICU physician's decision. HFNC was initiated after extubation with an initial flow rate of 60 L/min, and FiO2 was titrated to maintain SpO2 between 95% and 100%. HFNC was planned to continue for at least the first 24 hours after extubation and was then weaned according to clinical tolerance.
Conventional Oxygen Therapy Group
Patients who received conventional oxygen therapy after planned extubation according to routine clinical practice and the attending ICU physician's decision. Oxygen was delivered via a standard nasal cannula or face mask, with oxygen flow adjusted to maintain SpO2 between 95% and 100%.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult post-neurosurgical patients with acute brain injury who were admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit of Bach Mai Hospital, required invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, and underwent planned extubation after meeting clinical readiness criteria. Patients received either high-flow nasal cannula or conventional oxygen therapy after extubation according to routine clinical practice and the attending ICU physician's decision.
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 16 years or older.
- Admission to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit after neurosurgery for acute brain injury, including traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, or other acute neurosurgical brain conditions.
- Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours.
- Undergoing planned extubation after clinical assessment by the treating ICU team.
- Successful completion of a spontaneous breathing trial lasting 30 to 120 minutes.
- Adequate airway protection, defined as an Airway Care Score less than 8 points.
- Neurological readiness for extubation, as assessed by Glasgow Coma Scale score and bedside neurological examination.
- Adequate oxygenation before extubation, including PaO2/FiO2 greater than 200 mmHg and PEEP less than 7 cmH2O.
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing tracheostomy.
- Known upper airway obstruction, including airway stenosis or airway tumor.
- Suspected cerebrospinal fluid leak or complex skull base fracture.
- Unplanned self-extubation.
- Requirement for immediate prophylactic reintubation before initiation of post-extubation oxygen therapy.
- Requirement for non-invasive ventilation before initiation of the study exposure.
- Missing key clinical data required for outcome assessment or propensity score matching.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Hanoi, Hanoi, 00000, Vietnam
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Director, Center for Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2026
First Posted
June 23, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
January 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be available after publication of the main study results. There is no predetermined end date for data availability; requests will be considered according to institutional policies, ethics requirements, and data sharing agreements.
- Access Criteria
- De-identified individual participant data may be shared with qualified researchers for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or scientifically valid secondary analyses. Access will require submission of a research proposal, approval by an ethics committee when applicable, and a signed data sharing agreement with the study custodian or sponsor. Available materials may include de-identified participant data underlying the published results, the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, analytic code, and informed consent form. Requests should be sent to the study contact by email.
De-identified individual participant data underlying the main study results may be shared after publication of the primary results. Data sharing will be considered for researchers conducting systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or methodologically sound secondary analyses. Access will require approval by an ethics committee and a signed data sharing agreement with the study custodian or sponsor. Supporting Information: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Analytic Code, Informed Consent Form Time Frame: Beginning after publication of the main study results; end date not yet determined. Access Criteria: Requests may be submitted by qualified researchers for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or approved secondary analyses. Data access will require ethics committee approval, a scientifically valid proposal, and completion of a data sharing agreement. Shared data will be de-identified. URL: Leave blank if there is no public repository. Email / Contact: haigmhshmu@gmail.com