BreEStim in Managing Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Parallel-group Trial Designed to Evaluate the Efficacy of BreEStim in Managing Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
2 other identifiers
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of innovative intervention of breathing controlled electrical stimulation (BreEStim) and sham BreEStim and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in management of neuropathic pain in patients after spinal cord injury (SCI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2029
July 31, 2026
July 1, 2026
2.8 years
June 15, 2026
July 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain Level as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
VAS scores are recorded from 0 to 10 with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "worst pain", a higher score indicating a higher level of pain. Change is reported as \[(VAS score at baseline) - (VAS Score 10 minutes after intervention)\] - a positive value indicates that the score (and pain level) decreased. Mean VAS difference will be compared.
Baseline, 10-15 minutes after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
the difference in the percentage of responders between active BreEStim and Sham BreEStim groups
Baseline, 10-15 minutes after intervention
the difference in the percentage of responders between between active BreEStim and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) groups.
Baseline, 10-15 minutes after intervention
Study Arms (3)
Active BreEStim Treatment
EXPERIMENTALSham BreEStim Treatment
SHAM COMPARATORThe transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
During the Active BreEStim Treatment session, participants will remain relaxed while breathing is monitored using a nasal cannula. Surface electrodes will be placed over the median nerve at the wrist or another selected peripheral nerve. Electrical stimulation will be synchronized with voluntary breathing and delivered at an individually tolerated intensity for approximately 30 minutes.
During the Sham BreEStim Treatment session, participants will remain relaxed while breathing is monitored using a nasal cannula. Surface electrodes will be placed over the median nerve at the wrist or another selected peripheral nerve. Electrical stimulation will be synchronized with voluntary breathing and delivered at the sensory threshold level for approximately 30 minutes.
During the TENS Treatment session, participants will remain relaxed while transcutaneous electrical stimulation is applied through surface electrodes placed over the painful area. Stimulation will be delivered at an individually tolerated intensity for approximately 30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- has a history of SCI \> 1 year
- has a DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions) score of 4 or greater
- has neuropathic pain \>3 months
- is stable on oral pain medications at least one month
- Able to tolerate BreEStim treatment for 1 minute
You may not qualify if:
- is on a mechanical ventilator
- is currently having active urinary tract infection (UTI)
- does not have any residual sensation in the arms
- has other pain (musculoskeletal, visceral etc.), but not neuropathic, e.g., shoulder pain from wheelchair use
- has a pacemaker to avoid possible side effect of electrical stimulation
- is not able to follow commands, or to give consent
- has asthma or other pulmonary disease
- has a history of cardiac pathology, implanted pacemakers, or current use of rhythm altering medication like beta-blockers
- has baclofen pump or deep brain implants
- has respiratory tract/sinus infection and rhinorrhea
- has low motor neuron injury that no responses will be triggered by electrical stimulation
- has severe mental disorders (e.g., depression, substance abuse) and is receiving active treatment and frequent monitoring
- is not medically stable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheng Li, MD, PhD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2026
First Posted
June 22, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2029
Last Updated
July 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share