Effects Of Sahrmann's Versus McGill Exercise In Patients With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
42
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether Sahrmann exercises or McGill exercises are more effective for reducing pain and improving function in adults with non-specific low back pain. It will also evaluate which exercise program is more effective in improving spinal range of motion. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do Sahrmann exercises reduce pain more effectively than McGill exercises? Do Sahrmann exercises improve disability more effectively than McGill exercises? Do Sahrmann exercises improve lumbar range of motion more effectively than McGill exercises? Researchers will compare a Sahrmann exercise program with a McGill exercise program to determine which approach produces better outcomes in patients with non-specific low back pain. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to either a Sahrmann exercise group or a McGill exercise group. Receive standard physical therapy treatment, including heat therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Perform the assigned exercise program under the supervision of a physiotherapist. Attend exercise sessions 3-5 times per week during the study period. Complete assessments of pain, disability, and lumbar range of motion before and after the intervention. Have pain measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and lumbar range of motion measured using a Baseline Bubble Inclinometer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
June 22, 2026
June 1, 2026
4 months
June 16, 2026
June 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
In the current study, patients with NPRS score 3-7 will be recruited. Patient level of pain will be assessed using this scale. NRS is 11-points (NRS-11) which counts the pain and is wildly used in clinical settings because it is easy to administer and score. The patient is asked to indicate the value of his pain on the scale. A 11-point scale was used, with "0" representing "no pain" and "10" representing the "most severe pain imaginable" at the time of assessment (10). The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) demonstrates moderate to excellent test-retest reliability with ICC values ranging from 0.58 to 0.93, and good construct validity with correlation coefficients of 0.48 to 0.54
upto 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
upto 6 weeks
Baseline Bubble Inclinometer
upto 6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group A: (Sahrmann's Exercises)
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in this group will receive conventional Sahrmann's exercises along with baseline treatment for non-specific low back pain.
Group B: (McGill Exercises)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients in this group will receive McGill Exercises along with baseline treatment for non-specific low back pain.
Interventions
Group A will receive sahrmann's exercises after the baseline treatment. It will be including 5 levels: Level 1 The participant slowly raised one leg to a position of approximately 90° hip flexion with 90° knee flexion. Level 2 From the final position of the previous level, the participant slowly lowered one leg such that the heel contacted the ground/plinth. Level 3 From the end position of level 1, the participant slowly lowered one leg such that the heel reached approximate 12cm above the ground. Then the leg slid out to fully extend the knee. Level 4 From the final position of level 1, the participant slowly lowered both legs together such that the heels contacted the plinth. Then the legs slid out to fully extend the knees. Level 5 From the final position of level 1, the participant slowly lowered both legs simultaneously such that the heels reached 12 cm above the ground. The legs then slid out to fully extend the knees.
Patients will receive three exercises for rehabilitating lower back pain, termed the McGill Big Three (MGB3). Mcgill begins with motion exercise (cat-camel motion exercise. It consists of six to eight cycle of spinal flexion and extension in quadruped position. 1. Curl-up In which patient flexes one knee while keeping the other straight to minimize loss neutral posture. Then, the patient gently raises just the head and shoulders a short distance off the floor. 2. Side plank The patient lying on the side supported on his elbow and hip, knees bent to 90 degrees, free hand place on the opposite shoulder. The patient then raises his trunk until the body supported on elbows and knees. If patient not able to perform side support exercise, the patient would assume the side lying position and initiate the contraction of quadratus lumborum by trying to lift both lower limbs up toward the ceiling. 3. Bird-dog The bird dog exercise (opposite arm and leg extension in the quadruped position) carri
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed patients of non-specific low back pain Adults between 18-35 years. Both male and female included Low back pain for minimum of three months NPRS score 3-7 will be recruited in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- History of any trauma and spinal injury History of previous lumbar surgery History of cancer, spinal infection, rheumatologic diseases, spine fracture, red flag signs.
- Congenital anomly (scoliosis, kyphosis) Systemic diseases affecting bones \& joints such as rheumatoid arthritis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (10)
Bielewicz J, Daniluk B, Kamieniak P. VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy? Pain Res Manag. 2022 Mar 29;2022:5337483. doi: 10.1155/2022/5337483. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35391853BACKGROUNDHernandez-Lucas P, Leiros-Rodriguez R, Mota J, Garcia-Soidan JL. Effects of a back school-based intervention on non-specific low back pain in adults: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04061-1.
PMID: 37430269BACKGROUNDNiroomand T, Rabiei M, Mohammadi BJJoAST. Investigating the Effects Janda's and Sahrmann's Correcting Exercise Approaches on Trunk Muscles Function in Young Girls with Lower Crossed Syndrome. 2023;7(3):48-58.
BACKGROUNDGhorbanpour A, Azghani MR, Taghipour M, Salahzadeh Z, Ghaderi F, Oskouei AE. Effects of McGill stabilization exercises and conventional physiotherapy on pain, functional disability and active back range of motion in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Apr;30(4):481-485. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.481. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
PMID: 29706690BACKGROUNDAhmad SNS, Letafatkar A, Brewer BW, Sharifnezhad A. Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and movement system impairment treatment in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 29;24(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06815-x.
PMID: 37644472BACKGROUNDAlkhathami K, Alshehre Y, Brizzolara K, Weber M, Wang-Price S. Effectiveness of Spinal Stabilization Exercises on Movement Performance in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Feb 1;18(1):169-172. doi: 10.26603/001c.68024. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36793568BACKGROUNDChan EWM, Hamid MSA, Nadzalan AM, Hafiz E. Abdominal muscle activation: An EMG study of the Sahrmann five-level core stability test. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2020 Dec;40(2):89-97. doi: 10.1142/S1013702520500080. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
PMID: 33005073BACKGROUNDHlaing SS, Puntumetakul R, Khine EE, Boucaut R. Effects of core stabilization exercise and strengthening exercise on proprioception, balance, muscle thickness and pain related outcomes in patients with subacute nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 30;22(1):998. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04858-6.
PMID: 34847915BACKGROUNDAlonso-Sal A, Alonso-Perez JL, Sosa-Reina MD, Garcia-Noblejas-Fernandez JA, Balani-Balani VG, Rossettini G, Villafane JH. Effectiveness of Physical Activity in the Management of Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 16;60(12):2065. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122065.
PMID: 39768944BACKGROUNDMorotani M. General principles of the Movement System Impairment diagnostic system. The Journal of Manual Physical Therapy. 2022;22(1):29-35.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fatima Khan, MSPT*
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2026
First Posted
June 22, 2026
Study Start
July 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share