NCT07208435

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a web application-based exercise program (delivered via Physitrack) for managing non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) compared to traditional home exercise programs. The trial focuses on whether web-based delivery can improve pain, function, quality of life, and adherence, providing evidence for digital rehabilitation as a practical alternative to conventional physiotherapy.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

September 27, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Non-Specific Low Back PainNSLBPWeb-Based Exercise ProgramTelerehabilitationRandomized Controlled TrialPhysiotherapyHome Exercise ProgramPain ManagementFunctional ImprovementQuality of Life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Reduction (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS)

    Change in self-reported low back pain intensity from baseline to 6 weeks, measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain. Participants report their average pain over the past 24 hours.

    Baseline and 6 weeks after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Functional Disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI)

    Baseline and 6 weeks after intervention

  • Quality of Life (Short Form Health Survey, SF-36)

    Baseline and 6 weeks after intervention

  • Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ)

    6 weeks end of intervention

  • Proprioception (Joint Position Sense Test, JPS)

    Baseline and 6 weeks after intervention

Study Arms (2)

Web-Based Exercise Program

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants complete an 8-week web-based exercise program via Physitrack. Sessions last 30-45 minutes, twice per week, focusing on core strengthening, spinal mobility, posture correction, and pain reduction. Exercises progress weekly from basic core engagement to advanced trunk control and integration.

Behavioral: Web-Based Therapeutic Exercise Program

Traditional Home Exercise Program

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants complete a 6-week traditional home exercise program. Sessions last 30-40 minutes, focusing on flexibility, basic trunk and core strengthening, balance, and ergonomic practice. Exercises progress weekly, emphasizing pain relief, trunk mobility, and functional strength.

Behavioral: Traditional Home Exercise Program

Interventions

Participants follow a 6-week traditional home exercise program with 30-40 minute sessions, twice weekly. The program focuses on flexibility, basic trunk and core strengthening, balance, and ergonomic practice. Exercises progress weekly, including cat-cow stretches, pelvic tilts, glute bridges, partial curl-ups, bird-dog, lunges, and posture training. Participants perform exercises independently at home using printed instructions, aiming to reduce pain, improve spinal mobility, and enhance functional outcomes.

Traditional Home Exercise Program

Participants complete an 8-week web-based therapeutic exercise program via Physitrack, with 30-45 minute sessions twice weekly. The program targets core strengthening, spinal mobility, posture correction, and pain reduction. Exercises progress weekly from basic core engagement and breathing techniques to advanced trunk control, dynamic movements, and integration. The platform provides instructional videos, reminders, educational content, and self-monitoring tools to enhance adherence, engagement, and self-management.

Web-Based Exercise Program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18-45 years diagnosed with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) for 6 weeks to \<12 months.
  • Self-reported pain intensity ≥3 on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
  • Evidence of functional limitation (Oswestry Disability Index or Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire).
  • Access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer with internet connectivity.
  • Ability and willingness to participate in telerehabilitation programs.

You may not qualify if:

  • Specific causes of low back pain (herniated disc with radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, fractures, infections, malignancy).
  • Neurological deficits (e.g., severe motor weakness, progressive neurological symptoms).
  • Severe psychiatric or cognitive disorders interfering with participation.
  • History of spinal surgery within the last year.
  • Severe comorbidities contraindicating exercise (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular disease).
  • Pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period.
  • Active substance or alcohol abuse.
  • Participation in other structured rehabilitation or physical therapy programs within the last 3 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Medipol University

Istanbul, Beykoz, 34810, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Searle A et al., 2015

    BACKGROUND
  • Hayden JA et al., 2005

    BACKGROUND
  • Qaseem A et al., 2017

    BACKGROUND
  • Fernández-Rodríguez R et al., 2021

    BACKGROUND
  • Natour J et al., 2015

    BACKGROUND
  • Wells C et al., 2014

    BACKGROUND
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

    PMID: 1593914BACKGROUND
  • Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.

    PMID: 11074683BACKGROUND
  • Sissel C. Pilates for Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. 2018.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bini SA, Schilling PL, Patel SP, Kalore NV, Ast MP, Maratt JD, Schuett DJ, Lawrie CM, Chung CC, Steele GD. Digital Orthopaedics: A Glimpse Into the Future in the Midst of a Pandemic. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7S):S68-S73. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.048. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

    PMID: 32416956BACKGROUND
  • Tseli E, Tsepis E, Anastasopoulos K, et al. Telerehabilitation in patients with low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(3):149-63.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O'Leary SP, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017 May;31(5):625-638. doi: 10.1177/0269215516645148. Epub 2016 May 2.

    PMID: 27141087BACKGROUND
  • Moffet H, Tousignant M, Nadeau S, Merette C, Boissy P, Corriveau H, Marquis F, Cabana F, Ranger P, Belzile EL, Dimentberg R. In-Home Telerehabilitation Compared with Face-to-Face Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jul 15;97(14):1129-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01066.

    PMID: 26178888BACKGROUND
  • Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara AV, Koes BW. Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):765-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00013.

    PMID: 15867409BACKGROUND
  • Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000 Jan;84(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6.

    PMID: 10601677BACKGROUND
  • Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

    PMID: 27745712BACKGROUND
  • Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):581-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4.

    PMID: 10470716BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Merve Yılmaz Menek, Assoc. Prof

    Assoc. prof. Merve Yılmaz Menek

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Yağmur Mustafaoğlu, PT, MSc (Cand.)

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned to either the web-based exercise program (Physitrack) group or the traditional home exercise program group. Each group will receive their assigned intervention throughout the study period, and outcomes will be compared between groups to assess differences in pain reduction, functional improvement, and quality of life.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PT, MSc (Cand.)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2025

First Posted

October 6, 2025

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 19, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) from this study, including demographic information, pain scores (NPRS), functional disability scores (ODI), quality of life (SF-36), patient satisfaction (PSQ), and proprioception measurements (JPS), may be shared upon reasonable request. Data will be anonymized to protect participant privacy, and access will be provided for academic or research purposes only.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Data will be available from publication until 5 years post-publication.
Access Criteria
Requests must include a research proposal and approval by the principal investigator or institutional review board.

Locations