COMPARE-VENT Feasibility Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cardiac disease complicated by respiratory insufficiency comprises the most frequent indication for cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admission, with nearly one-third patients requiring advanced respiratory support and over 20% patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). IMV among patients with impaired cardiovascular reserve is further compounded by the adverse impact of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and systemic sedation on intracardiac hemodynamics, pulmonary vascular mechanics and consequently end-organ perfusion. Despite widespread use, evidence guiding optimal ventilatory practices and mode selection in cardiovascular intensive care unit patients remains limited. Pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation may differ in their effects on patient-ventilator synchrony, sedation requirements, and hemodynamic impact, but comparative data among patients with critical cardiac disease remains inconclusive. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of implementing a pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing ventilatory modes in a contemporary cardiovascular intensive care unit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
July 9, 2026
June 1, 2026
8 months
June 9, 2026
July 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adherance to assigned study mode (Feasibility Outcome)
Percentage of time spent on the assigned study mode while receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the cardiac ICU between enrollment and 48 hours after enrollment.
Enrollment to 48 hours
Time From Enrollment to Initiation of Assigned Mode of Mechanical Ventilation (Feasibility Outcome)
Time (number of hours) taken to initiate participants from enrollment (cardiac ICU admission) to initiation of assigned study mode of invasive mechanical ventilation upto 48 hours after enrollment.
Enrollment to 48 Hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
In-hospital Mortality (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
Enrollment to Study Day 28
Ventilator-Free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
Enrollment to Study Day 28
Organ Failure Free Survival Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
Enrollment to Study Day 28
Vasoactive-inotrope score (Exploratory Hemodynamic Outcome)
Enrollment to 48 hours
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)
Enrollment to Study Day 28
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pressure Controlled Ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring invasive mechanical ventilation in the cardiac ICU, pressure-controlled ventilation will be used as the mode for continuous mandatory ventilation.
Volume-Controlled Ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring invasive mechanical ventilation in the cardiac ICU, volume-controlled ventilation will be used as the mode for continuous mandatory ventilation.
Interventions
Volume-controlled mode for continuous mandatory ventilation with preset inspiratory flow and tidal volume.
Pressure-controlled mode for continuous mandatory ventilation with preset inspiratory pressure above positive end-expiratory pressure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible adults ≥ 18 years of age admitted to the cardiac ICU with need for invasive mechanical ventilation of expected duration \>12 hours.
- Pre-Specified Subgroups for exploratory outcomes:
- SCAI Stages C-E Cardiogenic Shock
- Mechanical circulatory support use, including intra-aortic balloon pumps and microaxial flow pumps, including Impella CP, RP Impella Flex, and Impella 5.5 devices
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: LVEF \<40% or;
- Moderate to severe RV systolic dysfunction or;
- Moderate to severe Pulmonary hypertension, as defined by ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines
You may not qualify if:
- Expected duration of intubation \<12 hours.
- Severe COPD, bronchopleural fistulas, or severe ARDS (Berlin criteria P/F \<100, in the absence of pulmonary edema)
- Home ventilator or chronic tracheostomy.
- Pregnant, incarcerated, patients or those receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic, 1216 Second Street SW
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (7)
Seitz KP, Lloyd BD, Wang L, Shotwell MS, Qian ET, Muhs AL, Richardson RK, Rooks JC, Hennings-Williams V, Sandoval CE, Richardson WD, Morgan TL, Thompson AN, Hastings PG, Ring TP, Stollings JL, Talbot EM, Krasinski DJ, DeCoursey BR, Marvi TK, DeMasi SC, Gibbs KW, Self WH, Mixon AS, Rice TW, Semler MW; Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Effect of Ventilator Mode on Ventilator-Free Days in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Trial. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Oct 9:2024.10.08.24314961. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.08.24314961.
PMID: 39417127BACKGROUNDZhou Y, Holets SR, Li M, Cortes-Puentes GA, Meyer TJ, Hanson AC, Schulte PJ, Oeckler RA. Etiology, incidence, and outcomes of patient-ventilator asynchrony in critically-ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 11;11(1):12390. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90013-z.
PMID: 34117278BACKGROUNDAl Shehri AM, El-Tahan MR, Al Metwally R, Qutub H, El Ghoneimy YF, Regal MA, Zien H. Right ventricular function during one-lung ventilation: effects of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):880-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.09.012. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
PMID: 24447503BACKGROUNDKim KN, Kim DW, Jeong MA, Sin YH, Lee SK. Comparison of pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 31;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0238-6.
PMID: 27581657BACKGROUNDLi XF, Mao WJ, Jiang RJ, Yu H, Zhang MQ, Yu H. Effect of Mechanical Ventilation Mode Type on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Feb;38(2):437-444. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
PMID: 38105126BACKGROUNDRittayamai N, Katsios CM, Beloncle F, Friedrich JO, Mancebo J, Brochard L. Pressure-Controlled vs Volume-Controlled Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Physiology-Based Narrative and Systematic Review. Chest. 2015 Aug;148(2):340-355. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-3169.
PMID: 25927671BACKGROUNDAlviar CL, Miller PE, McAreavey D, Katz JN, Lee B, Moriyama B, Soble J, van Diepen S, Solomon MA, Morrow DA; ACC Critical Care Cardiology Working Group. Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 25;72(13):1532-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.074.
PMID: 30236315BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2026
First Posted
June 18, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
July 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share