Clinical Evaluation of the EpiFaith™ Syringe in Epidural Pain Management
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study evaluates a new medical device called the EpiFaith™ Syringe, which is designed to help clinicians more accurately identify the epidural space during pain management procedures. The epidural space is a narrow area near the spine where medication is delivered to treat chronic pain conditions. Finding this space correctly is a critical step in procedures such as epidural steroid injections, spinal cord stimulator placement, and minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD). Currently, clinicians locate the epidural space using a method called loss-of-resistance (LOR), which relies on the feel of a syringe plunger as a needle is advanced toward the epidural space. This technique depends on the clinician's experience and touch, and can sometimes result in multiple needle attempts or an incorrect signal that the epidural space has been reached when it has not. The EpiFaith™ Syringe is designed to provide a clear visual signal, called the Faith Signal, at the moment the epidural space is entered, reducing reliance on touch alone. The device is used with standard epidural needles and does not require additional equipment or significant changes to routine procedure workflow. This study will enroll 100 adults scheduled for a clinically indicated epidural pain procedure at Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions in Temecula or San Diego, California. Participants will be assigned to have their procedure performed using either the EpiFaith™ Syringe or a standard LOR syringe. The study will compare the number of needle attempts needed to access the epidural space and the rate of false signals between the two methods. Safety and patient-reported pain outcomes will also be collected for approximately one week following the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 27, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2026
June 17, 2026
June 1, 2026
4 months
May 24, 2026
June 12, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Measure number of attempts
Measure: Number of puncture/needle placement attempts required to achieve successful epidural space access
Intra-procedure
Measure false loss-of-resistance
Measure: False-positive loss-of-resistance (false LOR) rate, confirmed via epidurography/fluoroscopic contrast pattern when performed per routine care
Intra-procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Measure device related and procedure-related adverse events
Procedure day through approximately 1 week post-procedure
Change in pain intensity score on the 11-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline before the procedure on Day 0 and approximately 3 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after the procedure.
Clinician Usability Score on a 5-Point Likert Agreement Scale
Immediately after completion of the index epidural procedure on Day 0, before participant discharge.
Other Outcomes (4)
Procedure Duration From Skin Puncture to Successful Epidural Access
During the index epidural procedure on Day 0.
Procedure success rate
During the index epidural procedure on Day 0.
Contrast-confirmed epidural spread rate
During the index epidural procedure on Day 0.
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional LOR Syringe
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard-of-care loss-of-resistance technique using a conventional syringe during epidural procedures
EpiFaith™ Syringe
EXPERIMENTALEpiFaith™ syringe used in place of conventional LOR technique.
Interventions
The EpiFaith™ Syringe is a sterile, single-use piston syringe designed to assist clinicians in identifying the epidural space during neuraxial procedures. Unlike conventional loss-of-resistance syringes that rely solely on tactile feedback, the EpiFaith™ incorporates a spring-loaded piston mechanism that produces an objective visual indicator, the "Faith Signal," at the moment resistance decreases consistent with epidural space entry. The device is compatible with standard epidural needles and integrates into routine procedural workflow without significant modification.
Standard saline loss-of-resistance technique using a conventional epidural syringe. The clinician applies intermittent or continuous pressure to the syringe plunger while advancing the epidural needle, interpreting a sudden reduction in resistance as entry into the epidural space. No investigational device is used in this arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older at the time of informed consent.
- Scheduled to undergo a clinically indicated interventional pain management procedure as part of routine clinical care at the study site.
- Planned procedure requires epidural space localization using the loss-of-resistance technique and is compatible with use of either a conventional loss-of-resistance syringe or the EpiFaith™ syringe, in the judgment of the treating clinician.
- Eligible procedure types include cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or caudal epidural procedures; minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD) procedures when epidural access or localization is required; and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial epidural access procedures.
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent before any study-specific data collection.
- Able and willing to comply with post-procedure follow-up assessments through approximately 1 week after the procedure, including telephone or telehealth follow-up when applicable.
- For participants receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, the treating clinician must determine that the participant can safely undergo the planned epidural procedure according to standard institutional practice and applicable neuraxial anticoagulation guidance.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide written informed consent independently, including adults who require consent by a legally authorized representative.
- Known contraindication to the planned epidural procedure, including active infection at the puncture site, uncontrolled coagulopathy, or anticoagulant or antiplatelet status that precludes the planned procedure in the judgment of the treating clinician.
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any standard-of-care medication, contrast agent, or procedural material required for the planned epidural procedure, where such contraindication precludes the procedure.
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial that, in the investigator's judgment, would confound interpretation of study endpoints.
- Any medical, anatomic, procedural, or clinical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would make study participation unsafe or not in the participant's best interest.
- Pregnancy, unless the epidural procedure is clinically indicated and permitted under the enrolling site's standard clinical practice and IRB-approved procedures.
- Unwillingness or inability to complete required study assessments through approximately 1 week after the procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions
San Diego, California, 92111, United States
Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions
Temecula, California, 92590, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Maja Green, PhD, MBA
Solaris Research Institute Inc
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Krishnan Chakravarthy, MD, PhD
Solaris Research Institute Inc
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2026
First Posted
June 17, 2026
Study Start
May 28, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 27, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 28, 2026
Last Updated
June 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share