NCT07654907

Brief Summary

This study evaluates a new medical device called the EpiFaith™ Syringe, which is designed to help clinicians more accurately identify the epidural space during pain management procedures. The epidural space is a narrow area near the spine where medication is delivered to treat chronic pain conditions. Finding this space correctly is a critical step in procedures such as epidural steroid injections, spinal cord stimulator placement, and minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD). Currently, clinicians locate the epidural space using a method called loss-of-resistance (LOR), which relies on the feel of a syringe plunger as a needle is advanced toward the epidural space. This technique depends on the clinician's experience and touch, and can sometimes result in multiple needle attempts or an incorrect signal that the epidural space has been reached when it has not. The EpiFaith™ Syringe is designed to provide a clear visual signal, called the Faith Signal, at the moment the epidural space is entered, reducing reliance on touch alone. The device is used with standard epidural needles and does not require additional equipment or significant changes to routine procedure workflow. This study will enroll 100 adults scheduled for a clinically indicated epidural pain procedure at Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions in Temecula or San Diego, California. Participants will be assigned to have their procedure performed using either the EpiFaith™ Syringe or a standard LOR syringe. The study will compare the number of needle attempts needed to access the epidural space and the rate of false signals between the two methods. Safety and patient-reported pain outcomes will also be collected for approximately one week following the procedure.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
6mo left

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress10%
May 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 28, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 27, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 28, 2026

Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Measure number of attempts

    Measure: Number of puncture/needle placement attempts required to achieve successful epidural space access

    Intra-procedure

  • Measure false loss-of-resistance

    Measure: False-positive loss-of-resistance (false LOR) rate, confirmed via epidurography/fluoroscopic contrast pattern when performed per routine care

    Intra-procedure

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Measure device related and procedure-related adverse events

    Procedure day through approximately 1 week post-procedure

  • Change in pain intensity score on the 11-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Baseline before the procedure on Day 0 and approximately 3 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after the procedure.

  • Clinician Usability Score on a 5-Point Likert Agreement Scale

    Immediately after completion of the index epidural procedure on Day 0, before participant discharge.

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Procedure Duration From Skin Puncture to Successful Epidural Access

    During the index epidural procedure on Day 0.

  • Procedure success rate

    During the index epidural procedure on Day 0.

  • Contrast-confirmed epidural spread rate

    During the index epidural procedure on Day 0.

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Conventional LOR Syringe

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard-of-care loss-of-resistance technique using a conventional syringe during epidural procedures

Device: Conventional Loss-of-Resistance Syringe

EpiFaith™ Syringe

EXPERIMENTAL

EpiFaith™ syringe used in place of conventional LOR technique.

Device: EpiFaith™ Syringe

Interventions

The EpiFaith™ Syringe is a sterile, single-use piston syringe designed to assist clinicians in identifying the epidural space during neuraxial procedures. Unlike conventional loss-of-resistance syringes that rely solely on tactile feedback, the EpiFaith™ incorporates a spring-loaded piston mechanism that produces an objective visual indicator, the "Faith Signal," at the moment resistance decreases consistent with epidural space entry. The device is compatible with standard epidural needles and integrates into routine procedural workflow without significant modification.

EpiFaith™ Syringe

Standard saline loss-of-resistance technique using a conventional epidural syringe. The clinician applies intermittent or continuous pressure to the syringe plunger while advancing the epidural needle, interpreting a sudden reduction in resistance as entry into the epidural space. No investigational device is used in this arm.

Conventional LOR Syringe

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older at the time of informed consent.
  • Scheduled to undergo a clinically indicated interventional pain management procedure as part of routine clinical care at the study site.
  • Planned procedure requires epidural space localization using the loss-of-resistance technique and is compatible with use of either a conventional loss-of-resistance syringe or the EpiFaith™ syringe, in the judgment of the treating clinician.
  • Eligible procedure types include cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or caudal epidural procedures; minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD) procedures when epidural access or localization is required; and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial epidural access procedures.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent before any study-specific data collection.
  • Able and willing to comply with post-procedure follow-up assessments through approximately 1 week after the procedure, including telephone or telehealth follow-up when applicable.
  • For participants receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, the treating clinician must determine that the participant can safely undergo the planned epidural procedure according to standard institutional practice and applicable neuraxial anticoagulation guidance.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to provide written informed consent independently, including adults who require consent by a legally authorized representative.
  • Known contraindication to the planned epidural procedure, including active infection at the puncture site, uncontrolled coagulopathy, or anticoagulant or antiplatelet status that precludes the planned procedure in the judgment of the treating clinician.
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any standard-of-care medication, contrast agent, or procedural material required for the planned epidural procedure, where such contraindication precludes the procedure.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that, in the investigator's judgment, would confound interpretation of study endpoints.
  • Any medical, anatomic, procedural, or clinical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would make study participation unsafe or not in the participant's best interest.
  • Pregnancy, unless the epidural procedure is clinically indicated and permitted under the enrolling site's standard clinical practice and IRB-approved procedures.
  • Unwillingness or inability to complete required study assessments through approximately 1 week after the procedure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions

San Diego, California, 92111, United States

Location

Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions

Temecula, California, 92590, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Maja Green, PhD, MBA

    Solaris Research Institute Inc

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Krishnan Chakravarthy, MD, PhD

    Solaris Research Institute Inc

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2026

First Posted

June 17, 2026

Study Start

May 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 27, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 28, 2026

Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations