Cachexia and Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care
GM_ANT
Evaluation of Cancer Cachexia and Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care
1 other identifier
interventional
140
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the possible association between cancer cachexia and Gut Microbiota (GM) in patients with Breast Cancer (BC) cared at home. Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial condition causing weight loss, muscle loss, and reduced physical strength in people with cancer. Moreover, the study will also analyze whether different stages of cachexia are linked to changes in the GM. The study will also explore whether a supplementation with a probiotic mixture for twelve weeks is associated with changes in the GM and participants' nutritional and clinical condition. The effect of the probiotic mixture (experimental group) will be compared with a placebo (control group) to evaluate whether changes in the GM and in cachexia-related measures differ between the two groups. Participants will:
- Provide blood, stool, and urine samples to study the GM and biological markers.
- Answer questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life.
- Undergo assessments of nutritional status and body composition. Participants eligible for the intervention will take either a probiotic mixture or a placebo for twelve weeks. All study procedures will take place during home visits as part of the participants' regular home care program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Jun 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2028
June 17, 2026
June 1, 2026
2 years
June 10, 2026
June 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Gut Microbiota Alpha Diversity Indices
Alpha diversity assessed by Shannon, Simpson, and Chao indices derived from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Gut Microbiota Beta Diversity Metrics
Beta diversity assessed using Bray-Curtis and UniFrac dissimilarity metrics.
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Relative Abundance of major Gut Microbiota Taxa
Relative abundance of major microbial taxa assessed by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomics.
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Cachexia Status
Cachexia stage classified as no cachexia, precachexia, cachexia, or refractory cachexia.
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Symptom Distress Score
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Intestinal Permeability Biomarkers
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Systemic Inflammation Cytokine
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Fecal Calprotectin Concentration
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Probiotic Mixture
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive an oral probiotic mixture twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive a placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The placebo will be provided in sachets identical in appearance, taste, and administration schedule to the probiotic mixture. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits.
Interventions
Participants assigned to this intervention will receive an oral probiotic mixture twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The probiotic mixture will be administered in sachets and taken orally twice daily for 12 weeks.
Participants assigned to this intervention will receive a placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The placebo will be provided in sachets identical in appearance, taste, and administration schedule to the probiotic mixture and will contain no active bacteria.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients with Breast Cancer (BC)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able to understand the study objectives and provide written informed consent
- Able to speak and understand Italian
You may not qualify if:
- Antibiotic treatment within the previous 2 weeks
- Use of probiotic supplements within the previous month
- Artificial nutrition (enteral or parenteral)
- Severe dysphagia, intestinal obstruction, or impaired gastrointestinal function
- Diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study information and/or provision of informed consent
- Severe organ failure
- Refusal to participate For the interventional phase: refractory cachexia and/or life expectancy of less than 6 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETSlead
- University of Bolognacollaborator
Related Publications (28)
Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Benzeval M, Deary IJ, Dennison EM, Der G, Gale CR, Inskip HM, Jagger C, Kirkwood TB, Lawlor DA, Robinson SM, Starr JM, Steptoe A, Tilling K, Kuh D, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e113637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25474696BACKGROUNDStudenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Fragala MS, Kenny AM, Kiel DP, Kritchevsky SB, Shardell MD, Dam TT, Vassileva MT. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 May;69(5):547-58. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu010.
PMID: 24737557BACKGROUNDCruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz046. No abstract available.
PMID: 31081853BACKGROUNDHarris JA, Benedict FG. A Biometric Study of Human Basal Metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918 Dec;4(12):370-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370. No abstract available.
PMID: 16576330BACKGROUNDHui D, Bruera E. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Mar;53(3):630-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.370. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
PMID: 28042071BACKGROUNDBruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6-9.
PMID: 1714502BACKGROUNDMoro C, Brunelli C, Miccinesi G, Fallai M, Morino P, Piazza M, Labianca R, Ripamonti C. Edmonton symptom assessment scale: Italian validation in two palliative care settings. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0834-3. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
PMID: 15937688BACKGROUNDCrooks V, Waller S, Smith T, Hahn TJ. The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol. 1991 Jul;46(4):M139-44. doi: 10.1093/geronj/46.4.m139.
PMID: 2071835BACKGROUNDBalestroni G, Bertolotti G. [EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2012 Sep;78(3):155-9. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2012.121. Italian.
PMID: 23614330BACKGROUNDSchwenkglenks M, Matter-Walstra K. Is the EQ-5D suitable for use in oncology? An overview of the literature and recent developments. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(2):207-19. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1146594. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
PMID: 26808097BACKGROUNDStone CA, Tiernan E, Dooley BA. Prospective validation of the palliative prognostic index in patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Jun;35(6):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.006. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
PMID: 18261876BACKGROUNDLaborda-Illanes A, Sanchez-Alcoholado L, Dominguez-Recio ME, Jimenez-Rodriguez B, Lavado R, Comino-Mendez I, Alba E, Queipo-Ortuno MI. Breast and Gut Microbiota Action Mechanisms in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis and Treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 31;12(9):2465. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092465.
PMID: 32878124BACKGROUNDGoedert JJ, Jones G, Hua X, Xu X, Yu G, Flores R, Falk RT, Gail MH, Shi J, Ravel J, Feigelson HS. Investigation of the association between the fecal microbiota and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a population-based case-control pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jun 1;107(8):djv147. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv147. Print 2015 Aug.
PMID: 26032724BACKGROUNDDewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT, Band PR, Bennett JM, Bertino JR, Cohen MH, Douglass HO Jr, Engstrom PF, Ezdinli EZ, Horton J, Johnson GJ, Moertel CG, Oken MM, Perlia C, Rosenbaum C, Silverstein MN, Skeel RT, Sponzo RW, Tormey DC. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Med. 1980 Oct;69(4):491-7. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80001-3.
PMID: 7424938BACKGROUNDBernstein R, Isdale J, Pinto M, Du Toit Zaaijman J, Jenkins T. Short rib-polydactyly syndrome: a single or heterogeneous entity? A re-evaluation prompted by four new cases. J Med Genet. 1985 Feb;22(1):46-53. doi: 10.1136/jmg.22.1.46.
PMID: 3981580BACKGROUNDVarian BJ, Gourishetti S, Poutahidis T, Lakritz JR, Levkovich T, Kwok C, Teliousis K, Ibrahim YM, Mirabal S, Erdman SE. Beneficial bacteria inhibit cachexia. Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 15;7(11):11803-16. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7730.
PMID: 26933816BACKGROUNDAyling RM, Kok K. Fecal Calprotectin. Adv Clin Chem. 2018;87:161-190. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
PMID: 30342711BACKGROUNDHakozaki T, Nolin-Lapalme A, Kogawa M, Okuma Y, Nakamura S, Moreau-Amaru D, Tamura T, Hosomi Y, Takeyama H, Richard C, Hosokawa M, Routy B. Cancer Cachexia among Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer on Immunotherapy: An Observational Study with Exploratory Gut Microbiota Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;14(21):5405. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215405.
PMID: 36358821BACKGROUNDLauring AS, Lee TH, Martin JN, Hunt PW, Deeks SG, Busch M. Lack of evidence for mtDNA as a biomarker of innate immune activation in HIV infection. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050486. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
PMID: 23209754BACKGROUNDUbachs J, Ziemons J, Soons Z, Aarnoutse R, van Dijk DPJ, Penders J, van Helvoort A, Smidt ML, Kruitwagen RFPM, Baade-Corpelijn L, Olde Damink SWM, Rensen SS. Gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acid alterations in cachectic cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Dec;12(6):2007-2021. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12804. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
PMID: 34609073BACKGROUNDPanebianco C, Villani A, Potenza A, Favaro E, Finocchiaro C, Perri F, Pazienza V. Targeting Gut Microbiota in Cancer Cachexia: Towards New Treatment Options. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 17;24(3):1849. doi: 10.3390/ijms24031849.
PMID: 36768173BACKGROUNDHerremans KM, Riner AN, Cameron ME, Trevino JG. The Microbiota and Cancer Cachexia. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 12;20(24):6267. doi: 10.3390/ijms20246267.
PMID: 31842339BACKGROUNDHills RD Jr, Pontefract BA, Mishcon HR, Black CA, Sutton SC, Theberge CR. Gut Microbiome: Profound Implications for Diet and Disease. Nutrients. 2019 Jul 16;11(7):1613. doi: 10.3390/nu11071613.
PMID: 31315227BACKGROUNDAraos R, D'Agata EMC. The human microbiota and infection prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 May;40(5):585-589. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.28. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
PMID: 30777586BACKGROUNDZaorsky NG, Churilla TM, Egleston BL, Fisher SG, Ridge JA, Horwitz EM, Meyer JE. Causes of death among cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):400-407. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw604.
PMID: 27831506BACKGROUNDBruggeman AR, Kamal AH, LeBlanc TW, Ma JD, Baracos VE, Roeland EJ. Cancer Cachexia: Beyond Weight Loss. J Oncol Pract. 2016 Nov;12(11):1163-1171. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.016832.
PMID: 27858548BACKGROUNDNishikawa H, Goto M, Fukunishi S, Asai A, Nishiguchi S, Higuchi K. Cancer Cachexia: Its Mechanism and Clinical Significance. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 6;22(16):8491. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168491.
PMID: 34445197BACKGROUNDFearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
PMID: 21296615BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Enrico Ruggeri, Medicine
Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2026
First Posted
June 17, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2028
Last Updated
June 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and confidentiality considerations related to sensitive clinical and biological data.