Enhanced Recovery Versus Standard Care After Emergency Abdominal Surgery in Patients Requiring Emergency Laparotomy
Comparison of Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Surgery Versus Conventional Care in Emergency Laparotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol with conventional postoperative care in adults undergoing emergency laparotomy for intestinal obstruction or intestinal perforation. The main question this study aims to answer is:
- Does the ERAS protocol reduce surgical site infections compared with conventional care after emergency laparotomy? Researchers will also compare other recovery outcomes between the two groups, including length of hospital stay, occurrence of paralytic ileus (temporary loss of bowel function), time to first bowel movement, and time to start taking fluids by mouth after surgery. A total of 102 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive postoperative care according to the ERAS protocol, while the other group will receive conventional postoperative care. All participants will undergo emergency laparotomy using standard surgical and anesthetic techniques. Participants will:
- Undergo emergency laparotomy for intestinal obstruction or intestinal perforation.
- Receive either ERAS-based postoperative care or conventional postoperative care.
- Be monitored during their hospital stay for recovery and postoperative complications.
- Be assessed for bowel function recovery, ability to tolerate oral fluids, and length of hospital stay.
- Be followed for 30 days after surgery to determine whether a surgical site infection develops. The researchers hypothesize that patients managed with the ERAS protocol will have a lower frequency of surgical site infections and improved postoperative recovery compared with those receiving conventional care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2026
CompletedJune 16, 2026
June 1, 2026
6 months
June 10, 2026
June 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical Site Infection
Frequency of surgical site infection (superficial and deep) occurring within 30 days after emergency laparotomy will be assessed and compared between the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group and the conventional care group. Surgical site infection will be defined and classified according to standard surgical infection criteria as specified in the study protocol
From enrollment within 30 days postoperatively
Other Outcomes (4)
Hospital Stay
From surgery to discharge within 30 days
Paralytic Ileus
From surgery till hospital stay within 30 days postoperatively
Time to First Stool
From surgery till hospital stay until discharge within 30 days postoperatively
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ERAS Protocol Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergoing emergency laparotomy will receive postoperative care according to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol.
Conventional Care Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants undergoing emergency laparotomy will receive standard postoperative care as routinely practiced in the surgical unit.
Interventions
A standardized multimodal perioperative care pathway applied to patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The protocol includes pre-defined components for preoperative optimization, intraoperative management, and postoperative care. Postoperative elements include early mobilization, early initiation of oral fluids and diet, optimized multimodal analgesia, early removal of tubes/drains when appropriate, and structured fluid management.
Standard postoperative management routinely practiced in the surgical unit for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Care includes traditional postoperative monitoring, routine analgesia, delayed initiation of oral intake, standard mobilization practices, and conventional fluid and supportive management.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- acute intestinal obstruction or intestinal perforation
- planned for emergency laparotomy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Patients on chronic steroids
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Malignant ulcers confirmed by histopathological examination
- laparoscopic surgeries
- Acute abdominal trauma
- Patients who require postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) care
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Hospital Muzaffargarh
Muzaffargarh, Punjab Province, 34200, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Muhammad I Seerat, FCPS
Recep tayyip Erdogan Hospital Muzaffargarh
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2026
First Posted
June 16, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 30, 2025
Study Completion
October 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share