Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Open Liver Resection
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Open Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Open liver resection is associated with severe postoperative pain. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered the gold standard for pain control, its clinical application is often limited by postoperative coagulation profile derangement, which increases the risk of epidural hematoma. Continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a promising, safer alternative with a lower risk of bleeding complications. Objective: This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy, safety profiles, and impacts on respiratory function between ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB and TEA in patients undergoing elective open liver resection. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that continuous ESPB using a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) regimen is non-inferior to TEA regarding 72-hour postoperative pain scores at rest, while offering superior hemodynamic stability and fewer technique-related risks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
ExpectedJune 11, 2026
May 1, 2026
5 months
June 8, 2026
June 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain Intensity at Rest at 24 Hours
Postoperative pain intensity evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. The score will be recorded at rest exactly 24 hours after the completion of the surgery
At 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Cumulative Morphine Equivalent Consumption
From 0 to 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Intensity at Rest and During Coughing up to 72 Hours
At 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively
Incidence of Postoperative Complications and Adverse Events
Up to 72 hours postoperatively
Time to Gastrointestinal Recovery
Up to 72 hours postoperatively
First Postoperative Night Sleep Quality
On the first postoperative night
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae Plane Block Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive ultrasound-guided continuous bilateral erector spinae plane block at the T7 level with a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) regimen of Ropivacaine 0.1% (18 mL/3h on the right side and 18 mL/3h on the left side) for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive a thoracic epidural catheter inserted at the T7-T8 interspace with a continuous basal infusion of Ropivacaine 0.1% at a rate of 5-8 mL/h for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia
Interventions
Patients will receive a thoracic epidural catheter inserted at the T7-T8 interspace with a continuous basal infusion of Ropivacaine 0.1% at a rate of 5-8 mL/h for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided continuous bilateral erector spinae plane block at the T7 level with a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) regimen of Ropivacaine 0.1% (18 mL/3h on the right side and 18 mL/3h on the left side) for 72 hours postoperatively, combined with systemic multimodal analgesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \* Patients aged between 18 and 80 years old.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I to III.
- Scheduled to undergo elective open liver resection (open hepatectomy).
- Patient provides written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe coagulation profile derangement prior to surgery (defined as International Normalized Ratio \[INR\] \> 1.5 or 2.0, or Platelet count \[PLT\] \< 50 G/L or 100 G/L).
- Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C).
- Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD GOLD stage III-IV).
- Severe cardiac dysfunction with an ejection fraction (EF) \< 35%.
- Severe obesity with a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m².
- Localized infection at the planned puncture/needle insertion site.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (e.g., Ropivacaine) or opioids (e.g., Morphine).
- Pregnancy or current lactation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Bach Mai Hospital
Hà Nội, Kim Lien, Vietnam
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MSc, Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia and Resuscitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2026
First Posted
June 11, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual patient data will not be shared publicly to maintain patient confidentiality and privacy in accordance with local institutional regulations. The aggregated results will be published in the final thesis and scientific journals