NCT07602179

Brief Summary

Thoracic surgery in children is considered a highly invasive procedure that significantly affects respiratory mechanics and cardiovascular function, resulting in substantial physiological disturbances during the perioperative period. In pediatric patients, the chest wall is structurally immature and highly compliant; therefore, impairment of ventilation after thoracic surgery may persist and predispose to atelectasis, hypoxemia, and other pulmonary complications. Inadequate postoperative analgesia may further compromise respiratory function, delay mobilization, and prolong recovery, particularly during the first 48-72 hours after thoracic surgery, when pain intensity is typically greatest. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has long been regarded as the reference technique for postoperative pain control in thoracic surgery. However, in pediatric patients, epidural catheter placement may be technically challenging and is associated with potential adverse effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, urinary retention, and other neuraxial-related complications. Thoracic epidural blockade produces bilateral sympathetic inhibition, which may lead to hemodynamic instability, particularly during thoracic surgery requiring lateral decubitus positioning and one-lung ventilation. Furthermore, epidural placement is often performed after induction of general anesthesia in children, which may limit early recognition of neurological complications. These concerns highlight the need for alternative regional analgesic techniques that provide effective analgesia while maintaining hemodynamic stability. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently emerged as a promising fascial plane block for thoracic analgesia. Injection of local anesthetic deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process allows cranio-caudal spread across multiple dermatomes, potentially providing analgesia to the posterior, lateral, and anterior thoracic walls. Increasing evidence suggests that ESPB offers effective perioperative analgesia in thoracic surgery with a favorable safety profile and minimal sympathetic blockade. Continuous ESPB catheter techniques have also been reported to provide sustained postoperative analgesia comparable to epidural analgesia. Despite these encouraging findings, direct comparisons between continuous ESPB and TEA in pediatric thoracic surgery remain limited, particularly regarding hemodynamic effects, adverse events, and technical feasibility. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic stability of continuous ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB with thoracic epidural analgesia in children undergoing thoracic surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Erector spinae plane blockThoracic epidural analgesiaThoracic surgeryPediatricPostoperative painOpioid consumption

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cumulative opioid consumption within the first 72 postoperative hours

    Total opioid consumption included intraoperative fentanyl and postoperative rescue morphine administration. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was recorded during surgery, while rescue morphine was administered when postoperative FPS-R score at rest ≥4 despite rescue local anesthetic bolus

    From induction of anesthesia until 72 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Postoperative pain scores

    at 1hour, 2hour, 4hour, 8hour, 12hour, 18hour, 24hour, 30hour, 36hour, 42hour, 48hour, 54hour, 60hour and 72hour after surgery

  • Rescue analgesic requirement

    Within 72 hours postoperatively

  • Block-related characteristics

    During block performance and surgery

  • Catheter-related complications

    Within 72 hours postoperatively

  • Postoperative complications and adverse events

    Within 72 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the transverse process and erector spinae muscle at the appropriate thoracic level. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be injected into the erector spinae plane, followed by catheter placement for continuous postoperative analgesia. Continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h will be maintained for 72 postoperative hours.

Procedure: Thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB)

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive thoracic epidural analgesia before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, an epidural catheter will be inserted at the thoracic level under sterile conditions using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be administered via the epidural catheter, followed by continuous postoperative infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h for 72 postoperative hours

Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)

Interventions

Patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the transverse process and erector spinae muscle at the appropriate thoracic level. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be injected into the erector spinae plane, followed by catheter placement for continuous postoperative analgesia. Continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h will be maintained for 72 postoperative hours.

Thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB

Patients will undergo thoracic epidural catheter placement for perioperative analgesia. Continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine will be maintained for 72 hours postoperatively

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 16 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary cyst, mediastinal tumor, diaphragmatic hernia, lung tumor, or chest wall tumor requiring unilateral thoracic surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergy to local anesthetics;
  • Significant hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease;
  • Coagulation disorders or untreated hypovolemia;
  • Infection at the puncture site;
  • Spinal or chest wall deformity or paravertebral tumors near the puncture level.
  • Patients were withdrawn from the study if consent was withdrawn, if major intraoperative complications occurred such as massive bleeding (\>20 mL/kg), or if conversion to median sternotomy was required during surgery.
  • Patient's parents who do not consent to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital

Hanoi, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Bosenberg A. Erector spinae plane blocks: A narrative update. Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 Mar;34(3):212-219. doi: 10.1111/pan.14800. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

    PMID: 37971071BACKGROUND
  • Aksu C, Gurkan Y. Defining the Indications and Levels of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study of Our Current Experience. Cureus. 2019 Aug 8;11(8):e5348. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5348.

    PMID: 31602352BACKGROUND
  • Marhofer P, Zadrazil M, Opfermann PL. Pediatric Regional Anesthesia: A Practical Guideline for Daily Clinical Practice. Anesthesiology. 2025 Aug 1;143(2):444-461. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005554. Epub 2025 Jun 17.

    PMID: 40526440BACKGROUND
  • Singh S, Andaleeb R, Lalin D. Can ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block replace thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing thoracotomy? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Card Anaesth. 2022 Oct-Dec;25(4):429-434. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_269_20.

    PMID: 36254906BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Tea

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Plant PreparationsBiological ProductsComplex MixturesBeveragesDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaFood and Beverages

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ph.D. M.D

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2026

First Posted

May 22, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 15, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

May 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations