NCT07638202

Brief Summary

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has increased in recent years, affecting 16.1% of the adult population nationwide. Currently, there are pharmacological and psychological treatments that have a 67% remission rate for depressive symptoms and insomnia after up to four trials of antidepressant treatments. Recently, low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (Li-TMS) has been used to activate and generate structural and neural functioning changes in specific cortical regions such as the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as its activity is altered in MDD. Furthermore, an increase in circulating levels of granulocytes, monocytes, and inflammatory cytokines has been observed in patients with MDD, suggesting an association between inflammation and neurotoxicity with the development of depression and decreased BDNF, mainly affecting the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Therefore, it has been proposed to quantify markers of systemic inflammation and evaluate their correlation with MDD and their possible effect with Li-TMS. This was a probabilistic, two-arm, block-randomized, single-blind clinical trial. A qualified psychiatrist evaluated the patients according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) to confirm the diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Two groups were formed and randomly assigned to receive treatment: transcranial magnetic stimulation or the sham group. The patients were unaware of the treatment; they did not know whether they would receive low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (Li-TMS) or not. It was a clinical trial, two arms, probabilistic, block randomized, single-blind. The experimental group received conventional drug treatment combined with Li-TMS, and the control group was administered standard drug therapy with coil placement, without exposure to Li-TMS emission. Both groups had the device coils placed on them.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 6, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 25, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 18, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 18, 2026

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 10, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 10, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 18, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulationMajor Depressive Disorder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in depressive symptoms following 20 sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    The Hamilton Scale assesses the severity of depression or anxiety using scores that classify symptoms as mild, moderate, or severe, consists of 17 items that assess aspects such as mood, anxiety, insomnia, loss of interest, and somatic symptoms. Each item is scored between 0 and 2 or 0 and 4, depending on the symptom. The total score is obtained by adding the values of all items, with a typical range of 0 to 52 points. Interpretation of HAM-D Scores: 0-7 points: No depression. 8-13 points: Mild depression.14-18 points: Moderate depression 19-22 points: Severe depression \>23 points: Very severe depression, with risk of suicide. The scale also allows for monitoring changes in symptoms over time, evaluating response to treatment or remission of depression. A decrease of at least 50% from the initial score indicates a response to treatment, and scores below-7 suggest remission.

    From the start of treatment until 4 weeks after it ends.

Study Arms (2)

group of sham-treated patients

SHAM COMPARATOR

The Sham group was administered standard drug therapy with coil placement, without exposure to Li-TMS emission.

Other: control group B were administered standard drug therapy with coil placement, without exposure to Li-TMS emission.

Group receive low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (Li-TMS)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group receive low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (Li-TMS)

Other: The experimental group(A) received conventional drug treatment combined with Li-TMS.

Interventions

20 sessions of Li-TMS with the medical device Nibbot Pro Series. Each Li-TMS session consisted in positioning an eight-shaped coil over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) which dispensed magnetic pulses at 25 Hz, (30 mT) for 45 minutes. Subjects received one Li-TMS session daily, from Monday through Friday. The experimental group received conventional drug treatment combined with Li-TMS, and the control group were administered standard drug therapy with coil placement, without exposure to Li-TMS emission. Both groups had the device coils placed on them. At the end of the study, the control group received Li-TMS treatment.

Group receive low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (Li-TMS)

the control group were administered standard drug therapy with coil placement, without exposure to Li-TMS emission.

group of sham-treated patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder
  • insomnia

You may not qualify if:

  • Epilepsy
  • Alzheimer's Disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

1Clinical Epidemiology Research Unit. OOAD Guanajuato. Mexican Social Security Institute, Leon, Mexico,

León, Guanajuato, 37328, Mexico

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Blanca Olivia Murillo Ortiz, PhD

    Mexican Social Security Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Blinding was performed in patients who did not know whether or not they would receive treatment with low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (Li-TMS). The groups were selected at random.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This was a probabilistic, two-arm, block-randomized, single-blind clinical trial. A qualified psychiatrist evaluated the patients according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) to confirm the diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Two groups were formed and randomly assigned to receive treatment: transcranial magnetic stimulation or the sham group. The patients were unaware of the treatment; they did not know whether they would receive low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (Li-TMS) or not.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD MD Blanca Olivia Murillo Ortiz

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2026

First Posted

June 10, 2026

Study Start

January 6, 2025

Primary Completion

July 25, 2025

Study Completion

May 18, 2026

Last Updated

June 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The data will be accessible in a properly anonymized form, as the confidential information is protected and cannot be used to identify participants. However, the results are available upon formal request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
June 2026 to June 2028
Access Criteria
The dataset may be shared upon request by researchers interested in the research project, via the corresponding author's email address.
More information

Locations