Designing a Multicomponent Intervention for Improving Frailty. A Pilot Study in the Basque Country
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot study tested whether a new program for older adults with frailty could realistically be carried out in primary health care. That is why the main objective of this study was to evaluate the viability and feasibility of the newly designed frailty intervention. People over 65 were recruited in two health centers and invited to join a 3 month program combining group exercise, a medication review by a pharmacist, and nutrition workshops. The study also collected information on mobility, strength, nutrition, mood, cognition, and quality of life. Most measures were taken at the start and again four and eight months later. The results will help refine the program and guide the design of a larger clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2026
CompletedJune 12, 2026
June 1, 2026
9 months
May 27, 2026
June 10, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Recruitment rates
The numbers of pre-selected participants who met the inclusion criteria and eventually agreed to participate, as well as the drop-outs and their reasons were registered.
Baseline
Time required to recruit the sample
The time required to recruit the sample needed for the study was recorded.
Baseline
Participants evaluation time
The professionals recorded the evaluation time each participant required
From baseline to 8 months
Professionals' opinion on the difficulty and adequacy of the process
Professionals who performed the baseline and follow-up assessments completed a questionnaire on the difficulty and adequacy of the process
From baseline to 8 months
Adherence to the intervention
Number of attended sessions was registered
From baseline to 4 months
Participant satisfaction
Satisfaction was measured with an anonymous ad-hoc questionnaire, containing a total of 25 questions: The physical exercise and the nutritional components were evaluated with six questions each; general health improvements obtained during the intervention with 11; two last questions asked about the intention to keep exercising after the intervention ended and whether they would recommend this program to others.
Month 4
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change from Baseline in Functional Capacity at 4 and 8 months
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Physical Activity at 4 and 8 months
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Handgrip Strength at 4 and 8 months
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Eating Habits at 4 and 8 months
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Nutritional Status at 4 and 8 months
From Baseline to 8 months
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Intervention: physical exercise, polypharmacy review and nutritional care
EXPERIMENTALThe arm is composed of people aged \>65, independent (≥95 points) and frail (Short Physical Performance Battery \<10 points). The entire arm group receives the multi-component intervention based on physical exercise, polypharmacy review and nutritional care.
Interventions
Physical exercise: one-hour group sessions, twice a week for 12 consecutive weeks, at the Municipal Sports centre led by a licensed sports instructor. All sessions followed a standardized structure consisting of a warm-up phase of approximately 25 minutes, a strengthening phase of about 25 minutes adjusted to each participant's physical condition, and a final 10-minute relaxation phase including flexibility and balance exercises. Polypharmacy review: a primary care pharmacist reviewed the pharmacological treatments of each participant in order to detect potentially inappropriate prescriptions, following the STOPP/START criteria. Nutritional care: the dietary intervention consisted of three group workshops, one per month, lasting for an hour each. The three workshops, led by a nutritionist, covered the basics of healthy eating, dietary adaptations for specific conditions with recipe ideas, and strategies to prevent malnutrition and sarcopenia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>65 years old
- Barthel \>90 points (independent)
- Short Physical Performance Battery \<10 points (frail)
You may not qualify if:
- Having a terminal condition
- Suffering from pathologies with a poor prognosis
- Having difficulty in performing physical activities
- Not being able to communicate fluently in Spanish
- Presenting intellectual disabilities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute. Primary Care Group. Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care Area.
San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, 20014, Spain
Related Publications (9)
Tao A, Ho KHM, Yang C, Chan HYL. Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on psychological outcomes among older people with frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Apr;140:104437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104437. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
PMID: 36764033BACKGROUNDSirikul W, Buawangpong N, Pinyopornpanish K, Siviroj P. Impact of multicomponent exercise and nutritional supplement interventions for improving physical frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05551-8.
PMID: 39558234BACKGROUNDMorin KH. Clarifying the Importance of Pilot Studies. J Nurs Educ. 2023 Sep;62(9):487-488. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20230712-03. Epub 2023 Sep 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 37672495BACKGROUNDGutierrez-Valencia M, Izquierdo M, Cesari M, Casas-Herrero A, Inzitari M, Martinez-Velilla N. The relationship between frailty and polypharmacy in older people: A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;84(7):1432-1444. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13590. Epub 2018 May 3.
PMID: 29575094BACKGROUNDRashidi Pour Fard N, Amirabdollahian F, Haghighatdoost F. Dietary patterns and frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2019 Jul 1;77(7):498-513. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz007.
PMID: 31038679BACKGROUNDYang X, Li S, Xu L, Liu H, Li Y, Song X, Bao J, Liao S, Xi Y, Guo G. Effects of multicomponent exercise on frailty status and physical function in frail older adults: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Exp Gerontol. 2024 Nov;197:112604. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112604. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
PMID: 39426607BACKGROUNDNan J, Duan Y, Wu S, Liao L, Li X, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Zeng X, Feng H. Perspectives of older adults, caregivers, healthcare providers on frailty screening in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03173-6.
PMID: 35659258BACKGROUNDRivas-Ruiz F, Machon M, Contreras-Fernandez E, Vrotsou K, Padilla-Ruiz M, Diez Ruiz AI, de Mesa Berenguer Y, Vergara I; Group GIFEA. Prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling elderly persons in Spain and factors associated with it. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct;25(4):190-196. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1635113. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
PMID: 31637940BACKGROUNDO'Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O'Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, Liew A. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):96-104. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa219.
PMID: 33068107BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2026
First Posted
June 10, 2026
Study Start
December 23, 2024
Primary Completion
September 25, 2025
Study Completion
September 25, 2025
Last Updated
June 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share