Characterizing the Effects of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) as a Palatal Wound Dressing on Quality of Life and Sleep Following Mucogingival Surgery. Study Was Conducted at the Air Force Post Graduate Dental School. All HIPPA Consents and Research Informed Consents Are Located at JBSA-Lackland.
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial (2-arm) is to determine if the application of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) to palatal donor sites influence patients quality of life, sleep efficiency, and healing following mucogingival surgery. All patients were enrolled in the Air Force Post Graduate Dental School periodontics program and each patient required mucogingival surgery. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]:
- Does the application of PRF to palatal donor sites influence patient's quality of life following mucogingival surgery. \[outcome measure 1\]
- Does the application of PRF to palatal donor sites influence patient's sleep quality following mucogingival surgery. \[outcome measure 2\]
- Does the application of PRF to palatal donor sites influence palatal healing following mucogingival surgery. \[outcome measure 3\] Researchers will compare the application of PRF (test) as a palatal dressing to a commercially available product (control; oxidized cellulose membrane or collagen dressing) to determine the difference of effects. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receiving PRF or a commercially available product on the day of surgery. A survey response will be conducted at five time points (pre-operative, 24-hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 week) to obtain a quality of life metric. Sleep data was collected via a wearable device one week pre-surgical intervention and two weeks postoperatively. Finally, a clinical healing index was performed at 1 and 2 weeks post-operatively to obtain a healing score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 24, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2026
CompletedJune 10, 2026
June 1, 2026
10 months
May 26, 2026
June 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quality of Life: OHIP-14 summative scores utilized as a quality of life metric at five different time points. These scores were compared between the test and control group.
The Qualtrics survey tool sent out automated emails at 24 hours, 72 hours, 1-week and 2-week time points from the time of pre-surgery survey completion. Surveys included: (1) OHIP-14 questionnaire, which includes 14 questions related to seven different patient domains; (2) What is your pain at the palatal harvest site on a scale of 0-10? (NRS-11); and (3) Did you take any mediation today to relieve pain or swelling? (yes/no). The additive OHIP-14 score served as the primary outcome variable. The quality of life survey was completed pre-surgically, 24 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, and 2 weeks.
Pre-surgical survey to 2 weeks following surgical intervention.
Sleep Quality: sleep efficiency index obtained from wearable device.
A sleep monitoring device was issued to patients following informed consent (SleepImage® Ring 2019, SleepImage, Denver, CO). The sleep monitoring app will be downloaded on subjects' phones and each subject will be briefed on the function of the application. Subjects will be instructed to wear the device nightly throughout the study.
1 week pre-surgery to 2-weeks following surgical intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain: a numeric pain scale (0-10) was used to document site specific palatal harvest pain.
From pre-surgery survey, final survey was 2 weeks post surgical intervention.
Analgesic Consumption: a survey tool was used to document patients medication use post-surgery.
From pre-surgery survey to two weeks post surgical intervention.
Physiologic Healing at Palatal Donor Site: 5-point healing scale
Healing was assessed at 1-week and 2-weeks post surgical intervention.
Study Arms (3)
Quality of Life
EXPERIMENTALThe Qualtrics survey tool sent out automated emails at 24 hours, 72 hours, 1-week and 2-week time points from the time of pre-surgery survey completion. Surveys included: (1) OHIP-14 questionnaire, which includes 14 questions related to seven different patient domains; (2) What is your pain at the palatal harvest site on a scale of 0-10? (NRS-11); and (3) Did you take any mediation today to relieve pain or swelling? (yes/no).
Sleep Quality
EXPERIMENTALAfter informed consent is obtained at the pre-op appointment, subjects undergoing mucogingival surgery will be given a sleep monitoring device (SleepImage® Ring 2019, SleepImage, Denver, CO) and will complete a baseline QoL (Qualtrics XM®, 2002, Qualtrics, Seattle WA). The sleep monitoring app will be downloaded on subjects' phones and each subject will be briefed on the function of the application. Subjects will be instructed to wear the device nightly throughout the study. The subject will be instructed to complete the same QoL questionnaire at 24 hours, and 72 hours, as well as at the one-week and two-week post-operative appointments.
Healing
EXPERIMENTALAt 1- and 2- weeks, patients returned for post-operative appointments. At the follow-up appointment the surgeons were asked to document the presence of suppuration or bleeding at the palatal wound site. A standardized photograph was then taken with the following parameters (F-stop: 29, ISO: 200, Shutter Speed: 125). Three calibrated, blinded examiners then assessed the palatal wound based on the Landry et al palatal healing index.
Interventions
The test group had approximately 40 ml of whole venous blood collected from their antecubital fossa (R/L) prior to surgical start for the fabrication of PRF. Tubes were placed immediately into a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved horizontal centrifuge (Horizon 6 Drucker Diagnostics; Port Matilda, PA), and spun at 2300 rpm (700 g) for 16 min. After the centrifugation was complete, the PRF matrices were compressed into membranes. At the completion of surgery, PRF membranes (1-3) were used as a wound dressing at the harvest site. A palatal stent was used to secure the PRF via compression only, and no sutures were utilized for fixation at the harvest sites. Patients were instructed not to remove the palatal stent for 48 hours.
On the day of surgery, subjects randomized into the control group had a commercially available product of the surgeons choice (collagen matrices or oxidized cellulose membrane) placed at the palatal donor site. The matrix was compressed with a palatal stent and subjects were instructed to not remove the stent for 48 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \> 18 or \< 99
- required a mucogingival surgery
- had not taken an antibiotic for one month
- planned for a non-emergent periodontal procedure
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant or within 6 months post-partum
- female subjects who are nursing
- subjects who are decisionally challenged
- patients who have undergone antibiotic therapy in the past month
- ASA IV or higher status
- patients who have undergone chronic therapy with medications that could affect periodontal status or healing
- incompatible mobile phone devices.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Air Force Post Graduate Dental School
San Antonio, Texas, 78236, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Periodontics Resident, Air Force Officer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2026
First Posted
June 10, 2026
Study Start
May 24, 2024
Primary Completion
March 18, 2025
Study Completion
March 18, 2025
Last Updated
June 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results.
- Access Criteria
- The Air Force Post Graduate Dental School will be in charge of allowing access to IPD upon request.
All de-identified participant date sets are to be shared upon request.