Silicone Barrier Spray Versus Zinc Oxide Ointment for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis
Effectiveness of Structured Skin Care Using Silicone Barrier Spray Compared With Zinc Oxide Ointment for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis in Long-Term Care Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is a common skin condition among long-term care residents and is caused by prolonged exposure to urine or feces. IAD can lead to skin irritation, discomfort, impaired skin integrity, and an increased risk of secondary complications. Structured skin care, including cleansing and barrier protection, is recommended for the prevention and management of IAD. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a silicone barrier spray compared with zinc oxide ointment as part of a structured skin care program for residents with mild IAD in a long-term care facility. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either silicone barrier spray or zinc oxide ointment following routine skin cleansing. Clinical severity of IAD and skin barrier function were assessed at baseline, Day 7, and Day 14 using standardized clinical and biophysical measurements, including IAD severity score, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, skin pH, and skin temperature. The study aimed to determine whether silicone barrier spray provides comparable or improved outcomes compared with conventional zinc oxide ointment in the management of mild IAD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2026
CompletedJune 11, 2026
June 1, 2026
11 months
June 4, 2026
June 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Severity Score
Clinical severity of incontinence-associated dermatitis assessed using the modified Ghent Global Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Monitoring Tool (GLOBIAD-M). Scores ranged from 0 (normal skin) to 2 (more severe dermatitis), with lower scores indicating improvement in skin condition.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7, and Day 14
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Skin Hydration
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7, and Day 14
Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7, and Day 14
Skin pH
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7, and Day 14
Skin Temperature
Baseline (Day 1), Day 7, and Day 14
Study Arms (2)
Silicone Barrier Spray
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a silicone-based barrier spray after structured skin cleansing and moisturizing care throughout the 14-day study period.
Zinc Oxide Ointment
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received zinc oxide ointment after structured skin cleansing and moisturizing care throughout the 14-day study period.
Interventions
A traditional zinc oxide-based barrier ointment applied to the perineal skin after routine cleansing and moisturizing care. The ointment forms a protective barrier that helps reduce skin exposure to moisture, irritants, and friction associated with urinary and fecal incontinence. The intervention was administered as part of a structured skin care protocol throughout the 14-day study period.
A silicone-based skin barrier spray (Brava® Skin Barrier Spray, Coloplast A/S, Denmark) was applied to the perineal skin after each cleansing episode as part of a structured skin care regimen. The spray forms a transparent, breathable, water-resistant protective film designed to reduce moisture-related skin damage and friction while maintaining skin barrier integrity. Participants received the intervention throughout the 14-day study period following routine cleansing and moisturizing care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Resident of a long-term care facility.
- Diagnosis of mild incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD), classified as GLOBIAD Category 1.
- Ability to provide informed consent personally or through a legally authorized representative.
- Willingness to participate in the study and comply with study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) classified as GLOBIAD Category 2.
- Presence of skin erosion, skin loss, open wounds, or active skin infection in the assessment area.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to silicone-based barrier products or zinc oxide preparations.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital
Longtan, Taoyuan City, 325, Taiwan
Related Publications (4)
Bernatchez SF, Mengistu GE, Ekholm BP, Sanghi S, Theiss SD. Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015 Dec 1;4(12):705-710. doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0628.
PMID: 26634182BACKGROUNDHolroyd S, Graham K. Prevention and management of incontinence-associated dermatitis using a barrier cream. Br J Community Nurs. 2014 Dec;Suppl Wound Care:S32-8. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2014.19.Sup6.S32.
PMID: 25478854RESULTMcNichol LL, Ayello EA, Phearman LA, Pezzella PA, Culver EA. Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: State of the Science and Knowledge Translation. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018 Nov;31(11):502-513. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000546234.12260.61.
PMID: 30303813RESULTVan den Bussche K, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Beeckman D. The Ghent Global IAD Monitoring Tool (GLOBIAD-M) to monitor the healing of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD): Design and reliability study. Int Wound J. 2018 Aug;15(4):555-564. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12898. Epub 2018 May 24.
PMID: 29797507RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Po Jen Hsiao, MD, PhD
Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Hsieh Chih Tsai, PhD
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Po Chung Chen, MD, MS
Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- No additional study personnel were masked beyond the outcome assessor. Due to the visible differences between the silicone barrier spray and zinc oxide ointment, participants and care providers were aware of treatment allocation. All clinical assessments and biophysical measurements were performed by an independent outcome assessor who remained blinded to group assignment throughout the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2026
First Posted
June 10, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 30, 2023
Study Completion
November 30, 2023
Last Updated
June 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the informed consent and ethics approval did not include provisions for public data sharing. Data contain potentially identifiable information from residents of a long-term care facility, and sharing is restricted to protect participant privacy and confidentiality.