NCT07636538

Brief Summary

This interventional, multicenter, low-intervention clinical trial aims to evaluate the usability, feasibility, safety, and preliminary clinical impact of a robotic rehabilitation system designed for upper limb rehabilitation in adults with neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), post-stroke sequelae, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The system under study combines a collaborative robot (cobot), inertial sensors, and a graphical user interface capable of supporting reaching exercises, trajectory tracking activities, and cognitive exergames, while also enabling automatic acquisition and visualization of patient performance data. The main questions the study aims to answer are: Is the investigational robotic rehabilitation system usable and feasible in neurological patients undergoing upper limb rehabilitation? Is the use of the device safe for both patients and healthcare operators? Does the addition of robotic-assisted rehabilitation to conventional therapy improve upper limb motor performance, cognitive function, and quality of life compared with conventional rehabilitation alone? Do movement measurements collected by the system correlate with standard clinical assessment scales? Researchers will compare conventional rehabilitation therapy plus robotic-assisted rehabilitation with conventional rehabilitation therapy alone to evaluate the impact of the device on motor, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes. Thirty participants will be randomized into two parallel treatment groups. Both groups will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy lasting 60 minutes each, three times per week. Participants assigned to the experimental group will additionally receive robotic-assisted rehabilitation sessions of up to 30 minutes supervised by rehabilitation staff. Participants will undergo: Baseline collection of demographic and clinical information; Motor, cognitive, and activities of daily living assessments using standardized clinical scales; Conventional rehabilitation therapy sessions; Robotic-assisted upper limb rehabilitation exercises, including task-oriented and trajectory-tracking activities (experimental group only); Monitoring of vital parameters and adverse events during device use; Final evaluation of usability, psychosocial impact, patient satisfaction, motor and cognitive outcomes, and safety.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jun 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress51%
Jun 2026Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2026

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

May 25, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Collaborative RobotRobotic rehabilitationNeurological disordersGraphical User Interface

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • System Usability Scale (SUS) score

    Usability of the investigational device will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived usability and therefore a better outcome.

    at the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) Score

    Participant satisfaction and usability assessment using the QUEST 2.0 questionnaire. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 5 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater user satisfaction with the assistive technology and therefore a better outcome.

    At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • Incidence of Adverse Events

    Safety assessment based on the frequency of adverse events reported by participants or observed by operators during device use.

    Throughout the study period (up to 12 sessions)

  • State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score

    Anxiety associated with device use assessed through self-reported scale, State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Scale Title: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Minimum Value: 20. Maximum Value: 80. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and therefore a worse outcome.

    Baseline and end of treatment

  • Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) Usability Questionnaire Score

    Usability assessment evaluating the ability of users to safely, effectively, and efficiently interact with the system. Scale Title: Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) - Usability Domain. Minimum Value: 5. Maximum Value: 20. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better perceived usability of the technology-assisted rehabilitation device and therefore a better outcome.

    At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score

    Perceived stress due to the use of the device assessed via Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score. Scale Title: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 40. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress and therefore a worse outcome.

    At the end of the treatment (after 12 sessions).

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Score

    Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment Score

    Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • ABILHAND Scale Score

    Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score

    Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score

    Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Conventional Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ten patients with similar upper limb functional impairment (Parkinson's Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and post-stroke sequelae) and five patients with or without upper limb functional impairment but affected by early cognitive impairment (Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI) will undergo conventional rehabilitation therapy only. In particular, they will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week).

Other: conventional therapy

Robotic Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Ten patients with upper limb motor functional impairment, as assessed by the QuickDASH scale with scores ranging from 20 to 90, due to chronic neurological diseases (Parkinson's Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) or post-acute conditions (post-stroke sequelae), and five patients with or without upper limb motor functional impairment but affected by early cognitive impairment (Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI), will receive treatment sessions using the investigational device in addition to conventional rehabilitation therapy sessions. In particular, they will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week) in addition to training sessions with the investigational robotic device. Device sessions will last up to 30 minutes and will be supervised by rehabilitation staff. Exercise difficulty will be adapted according to the participant's performance.

Device: Auto-calibrating System for Upper Limb disability Assessment, neurological and occupational Rehabilitation

Interventions

Participants will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week) in addition to training sessions with the investigational robotic device. Device sessions will last up to 30 minutes and will be supervised by rehabilitation staff. The investigational robotic system provides adaptive upper limb rehabilitation exercises tailored to the patient's motor performance. Training includes task-oriented reaching exercises combined with cognitive tasks requiring target sequence memorization, as well as trajectory-tracking exercises in which the robot guides the patient's hand along predefined movements recorded by the therapist. Exercise difficulty is progressively adjusted according to patient performance during previous sessions.

Robotic Therapy

Participants will receive conventional rehabilitation therapy according to standard clinical practice for upper limb motor rehabilitation. Treatment sessions will last 60 minutes, three times per week, for a total of 12 sessions.

Conventional Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged between 18 and 80 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of one of the following neurological conditions: stroke, Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).
  • Presence of upper limb motor impairment defined by QuickDASH scores ranging from 20 to 90.
  • Ability to understand and follow the study protocol instructions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments that interfere with the ability to complete cognitive tests and self-assessment scales.
  • Individuals unable to provide informed consent.
  • Subjects with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, defined by an ECAS score lower than 81.92 (ALS patients) or a MoCA score between 18 and 25.
  • Physical conditions significantly limiting upper limb use (e.g., severe concomitant orthopedic disorders affecting shoulder movement).
  • Current or recent participation (within the previous three months) in other rehabilitation programs or interventions that could influence study outcomes.
  • Unstable health conditions that could make device use unsafe or inappropriate, including unstable medical conditions or severe visual impairments.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisParkinson DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionNervous System Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesSpinal Cord DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesTDP-43 ProteinopathiesNeuromuscular DiseasesProteostasis DeficienciesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesParkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Antonella Ferrara, PhD

    University of Pavia

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Cira Fundarò, MD

    Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2026

First Posted

June 9, 2026

Study Start

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share