Auto-calibrating System for Upper Limb Disability Assessment, Neurological and Occupational Rehabilitation
ASULDAR
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This interventional, multicenter, low-intervention clinical trial aims to evaluate the usability, feasibility, safety, and preliminary clinical impact of a robotic rehabilitation system designed for upper limb rehabilitation in adults with neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), post-stroke sequelae, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The system under study combines a collaborative robot (cobot), inertial sensors, and a graphical user interface capable of supporting reaching exercises, trajectory tracking activities, and cognitive exergames, while also enabling automatic acquisition and visualization of patient performance data. The main questions the study aims to answer are: Is the investigational robotic rehabilitation system usable and feasible in neurological patients undergoing upper limb rehabilitation? Is the use of the device safe for both patients and healthcare operators? Does the addition of robotic-assisted rehabilitation to conventional therapy improve upper limb motor performance, cognitive function, and quality of life compared with conventional rehabilitation alone? Do movement measurements collected by the system correlate with standard clinical assessment scales? Researchers will compare conventional rehabilitation therapy plus robotic-assisted rehabilitation with conventional rehabilitation therapy alone to evaluate the impact of the device on motor, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes. Thirty participants will be randomized into two parallel treatment groups. Both groups will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy lasting 60 minutes each, three times per week. Participants assigned to the experimental group will additionally receive robotic-assisted rehabilitation sessions of up to 30 minutes supervised by rehabilitation staff. Participants will undergo: Baseline collection of demographic and clinical information; Motor, cognitive, and activities of daily living assessments using standardized clinical scales; Conventional rehabilitation therapy sessions; Robotic-assisted upper limb rehabilitation exercises, including task-oriented and trajectory-tracking activities (experimental group only); Monitoring of vital parameters and adverse events during device use; Final evaluation of usability, psychosocial impact, patient satisfaction, motor and cognitive outcomes, and safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
ExpectedJune 9, 2026
May 1, 2026
1 month
May 25, 2026
June 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Usability of the investigational device will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived usability and therefore a better outcome.
at the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) Score
Participant satisfaction and usability assessment using the QUEST 2.0 questionnaire. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 5 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater user satisfaction with the assistive technology and therefore a better outcome.
At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Incidence of Adverse Events
Safety assessment based on the frequency of adverse events reported by participants or observed by operators during device use.
Throughout the study period (up to 12 sessions)
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score
Anxiety associated with device use assessed through self-reported scale, State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Scale Title: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Minimum Value: 20. Maximum Value: 80. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline and end of treatment
Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) Usability Questionnaire Score
Usability assessment evaluating the ability of users to safely, effectively, and efficiently interact with the system. Scale Title: Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) - Usability Domain. Minimum Value: 5. Maximum Value: 20. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better perceived usability of the technology-assisted rehabilitation device and therefore a better outcome.
At the end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score
Perceived stress due to the use of the device assessed via Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score. Scale Title: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 40. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress and therefore a worse outcome.
At the end of the treatment (after 12 sessions).
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Score
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Score
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
ABILHAND Scale Score
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score
Baseline and end of treatment (after 12 sessions)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORTen patients with similar upper limb functional impairment (Parkinson's Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and post-stroke sequelae) and five patients with or without upper limb functional impairment but affected by early cognitive impairment (Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI) will undergo conventional rehabilitation therapy only. In particular, they will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week).
Robotic Therapy
EXPERIMENTALTen patients with upper limb motor functional impairment, as assessed by the QuickDASH scale with scores ranging from 20 to 90, due to chronic neurological diseases (Parkinson's Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) or post-acute conditions (post-stroke sequelae), and five patients with or without upper limb motor functional impairment but affected by early cognitive impairment (Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI), will receive treatment sessions using the investigational device in addition to conventional rehabilitation therapy sessions. In particular, they will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week) in addition to training sessions with the investigational robotic device. Device sessions will last up to 30 minutes and will be supervised by rehabilitation staff. Exercise difficulty will be adapted according to the participant's performance.
Interventions
Participants will receive 12 sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (60 minutes each, three times per week) in addition to training sessions with the investigational robotic device. Device sessions will last up to 30 minutes and will be supervised by rehabilitation staff. The investigational robotic system provides adaptive upper limb rehabilitation exercises tailored to the patient's motor performance. Training includes task-oriented reaching exercises combined with cognitive tasks requiring target sequence memorization, as well as trajectory-tracking exercises in which the robot guides the patient's hand along predefined movements recorded by the therapist. Exercise difficulty is progressively adjusted according to patient performance during previous sessions.
Participants will receive conventional rehabilitation therapy according to standard clinical practice for upper limb motor rehabilitation. Treatment sessions will last 60 minutes, three times per week, for a total of 12 sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged between 18 and 80 years.
- Confirmed diagnosis of one of the following neurological conditions: stroke, Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).
- Presence of upper limb motor impairment defined by QuickDASH scores ranging from 20 to 90.
- Ability to understand and follow the study protocol instructions.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments that interfere with the ability to complete cognitive tests and self-assessment scales.
- Individuals unable to provide informed consent.
- Subjects with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, defined by an ECAS score lower than 81.92 (ALS patients) or a MoCA score between 18 and 25.
- Physical conditions significantly limiting upper limb use (e.g., severe concomitant orthopedic disorders affecting shoulder movement).
- Current or recent participation (within the previous three months) in other rehabilitation programs or interventions that could influence study outcomes.
- Unstable health conditions that could make device use unsafe or inappropriate, including unstable medical conditions or severe visual impairments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pavialead
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Antonella Ferrara, PhD
University of Pavia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cira Fundarò, MD
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2026
First Posted
June 9, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share