Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Trigger Point Injection for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Versus Trigger Point Injection (TPI) for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Chronic thoracic (mid-back) pain can be difficult to treat, and there is limited evidence to guide the use of injection therapies for pain arising from muscles and surrounding soft tissues. Two commonly used treatments are trigger point injections (TPI) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, but no studies have directly compared their effectiveness for chronic thoracic myofascial pain. The purpose of this study is to compare pain relief, physical function, emotional well-being, patient satisfaction, and safety following treatment with either an ESP block or TPI. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments. Researchers will follow participants for up to 12 weeks after the procedure and collect information through questionnaires and pain assessments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2026
Typical duration for phase_4
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2029
June 8, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 years
June 3, 2026
June 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score
A Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain is a patient-reported item regarding the level of pain experienced and is measured on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable".
baseline, 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Modified Oswestry Disability Index
baseline, 6 weeks
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
baseline, 6 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
baseline, 6 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
6 weeks
Repeat Injections
12 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Fasciculation (in Trigger Point Injection Cohort Only)
Day 0 (procedure day)
Taut band Visualization (in Trigger Point Injection Cohort Only)
Day 0 (procedure day)
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score During and After Injection
Day 0 (procedure day)
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain.
Trigger Point Injection (TPI)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality.
Interventions
Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain.
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18-80 years
- Chronic thoracic myofascial pain lasting at least three months
- Pain intensity of ≥4 on 11-point NRS
- At least two of three following conditions: Focal thoracic paraspinal pain, palpable taut band, referred pain pattern with palpation
You may not qualify if:
- Thoracic radiculopathy
- Cervical myelopathy with neurological deficit
- Prior cervicothoracic spine surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Contraindication to local anesthetic
- Active malignancy
- Fibromyalgia
- BMI \>40 kg/m2
- Workers' compensation or active litigation related to thoracic pain
- Acute herpes zoster or history of postherpetic neuralgia involving thoracic dermatomes
- Current opioid use \>50 morphine milligram equivalents daily
- Severe psychiatric or cognitive disorders, specifically history of schizophrenia, chronic psychotic disorders, dementia
- History of substance use disorder
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- University of Maryland, Baltimorecollaborator
- Mayo Cliniclead
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centercollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ryan D'Souza, MD
Mayo Clinic
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist, Pain Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2026
First Posted
June 8, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2029
Last Updated
June 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share