NCT07629349

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to improve the detection of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and its prodromal phases, as well as advancing our current understanding of biological mechanisms and therapeutic options. The data is acquired at cognitive clinics in Stockholm (Sweden) and combined with national and international data to increase statistical power, representativeness and replication of results. Participants undergo collection of clinical assessments, neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
57mo left

Started Jan 2020

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress58%
Jan 2020Mar 2031

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2020

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 5, 2026

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2031

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2031

Last Updated

June 5, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

11.2 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

case-controlretrospectivelongitudinal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (28)

  • Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta 1-42

    Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-beta 1-42 was coded as normal/abnormal/unknown based on centre-specific cutoffs. CSF samples were obtained from the Karolinska Institutet GEDOC Biobank (Stockholm, Sweden).

    Data for this outcome are collected at baseline.

  • Cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau 181

    Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated tau 181 was coded as normal/abnormal/unknown based on centre-specific cutoffs. CSF samples were obtained from the Karolinska Institutet GEDOC Biobank (Stockholm, Sweden).

    Data for this outcome are collected at baseline.

  • DaT-Scan

    Dopamine transporter scan (DaT-Scan) was coded as normal/abnormal/unknown based on visual assessment as per established diagnostic criteria.

    Data for this outcome are collected at baseline.

  • MRI

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images were coded as normal/abnormal/unknown based on visual assessment as per established diagnostic criteria.

    Data for this outcome are collected at baseline.

  • EEG

    Electroencephalography (EEG) was coded as normal/abnormal/unknown based on visual assessment as per established diagnostic criteria.

    Data for this outcome are collected at baseline.

  • FDG-PET

    Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Topography (FDG-PET) was coded as normal/abnormal/unknown based on visual assessment as per established diagnostic criteria.

    Data for this outcome are collected at baseline.

  • RAVLT

    Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) was used to assess memory, with participants' scores recorded across five learning trials. Total scores ranged from 0 to 75, with a maximum raw score of 15 per trial. Higher scores indicate better memory performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • RAVLT delayed recall

    Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) delayed recall assesses participants' memory based on the number of words recalled from a 15-word list after 30 minutes of learning. Total scores can thus range from 0 to 15. Higher scores indicate better memory performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • RCFT copy

    Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT) copy was used to assess participants' visuospatial abilities. Performance is evaluated based on the reproduction of 18 figure elements, each scored on a scale from 0 to 2 (0 = incorrectly placed/absent; 0.5 = inaccurately drawn/incorrectly placed but recognisable; 1 = accurately drawn but poorly placed/incomplete but correctly placed; 2 = accurately drawn and correctly placed), yielding a maximum raw score of 36. Higher scores reflect better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • RCFT recall

    Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT) immediate recall was used to assess participants' memory by requiring them to reproduce a complex figure from memory after a short delay. Performance is evaluated based on the reproduction of 18 figure elements, each scored on a scale from 0 to 2 (0 = incorrectly placed/absent; 0.5 = inaccurately drawn/incorrectly placed but recognisable; 1 = accurately drawn but poorly placed/incomplete but correctly placed; 2 = accurately drawn and correctly placed), yielding a maximum raw score of 36. Higher scores reflect better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Information

    The Information subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was used to assess participants' verbal comprehension. The subtest comprises 26 dichotomously scored questions (0 = incorrect; 1 = correct), with a maximum raw score of 26. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Similarities

    The Similarities subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was used to assess participants' verbal reasoning. Consisting of 18 pairs of words, for which participants are asked to describe how the items are similar, responses are scored on a 3-point scale (0 = incorrect; 1 = functional/concrete; 2 = abstract). Raw scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Block Design

    The Block Design subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) assesses participants' visuospatial abilities. Performance is scored based on the accuracy and speed in reproducing geometric patterns. While the first few items are simple and scored on a 2-point scale (0 = inaccurate; 2 = accurate), later items become more complex and thus yield higher scores (ranging from 0 to 7 depending on the speed of completion). Total scores range from 0 to 66, where higher scores indicate better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Digit Span

    The Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was administered to assess participants' working memory and attention. Participants repeated digit sequences of increasing length, with each trial scored as correct or incorrect. The span length of digits to be recalled ranged from 2 to 9 for the forward and sequencing conditions and from 2 to 8 for the backward condition. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Coding

    The Coding subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was used to assess processing speed. Within a 120-second time limit, participants are required to transcribe symbols paired with digits as quickly and accurately as possible. Performance is scored as the number of correctly completed symbols (0 = incorrect; 1 = correct), with higher scores indicating better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Arithmetic

    The Arithmetic subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was administered to assess working memory and processing speed. Participants solved 22 orally presented arithmetic problems. Performance was scored as the number of correct answers, with one point awarded per correct item (minimum = 0; maximum = 22). Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Matrix Reasoning

    The Matrix Reasoning subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was used to assess logical thinking. Comprising 26 items of increasing difficulty, participants identify patterns and select the correct missing piece from several response options. Responses are scored dichotomously (0 = incorrect; 1 = correct), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 26. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • TMT A

    The Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) was administered to assess attention and processing speed. Performance is measured by the time required to sequentially connect numbered dots in ascending order, with longer completion times indicating worse performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • TMT B

    The Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) was administered to assess executive functioning. Performance is measured by the time required to connect numbered and lettered dots in an alternating ascending order, with longer completion times indicating worse performance.

    Within 6 months of participants receiving their final diagnosis.

  • Parkinsonism

    Presence of parkinsonism was determined based on clinical interviews with participants. Responses were coded as present/absent/unknown for parkinsonism symptoms.

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • UPDRS-III

    The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) was administered to assess the presence and severity of parkinsonian motor symptoms. The scale comprises 33 items rated on a 5-point scale (0 = normal to 4 = severe), with higher scores indicating greater motor impairment (minimum = 0; maximum = 132).

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • Visual hallucinations

    The presence of visual hallucinations was assessed based on clinical interviews. Responses were coded as either present/absent/unknown.

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • NPI

    The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) was used to assess the presence of visual hallucinations. Responses were evaluated across three stages: presence, frequency, and severity. Presence of visual hallucinations was coded dichotomously as "Yes" or "No". Frequency was rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (occasionally) to 4 (very frequently), whereas severity was rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (mild) to 3 (severe). Domain scores were calculated by multiplying frequency and severity scores, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate greater impairment from visual hallucinations.

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • Cognitive fluctuations

    Clinical interviews were used to assess the presence of cognitive fluctuations. Responses were coded as present/absent/unknown.

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • Mayo Fluctuations Scale

    The Mayo Fluctuations Scale was administered to assess cognitive fluctuations. The scale comprises four dichotomous questions (0 = no; 1 = yes), with total scores ranging from 0 to 4. Higher scores thus indicate greater impairment.

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder

    Clinical interviews were used to assess the presence of REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder (RBD). Responses were coded as present/absent/unknown.

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • Mayo Sleep Questionnaire

    The Mayo Sleep Questionnaire is a 16-item instrument used to assess the presence of REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder (RBD). Items are answered dichotomously (0 = no; 1 = yes). The likelihood of RBD is estimated by summing the "yes" responses to the four key RBD sub-questions, yielding a total score ranging from 0 (low likelihood of RBD) to 4 (high likelihood of RBD).

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

  • Polysomnography

    Polysomnography was used to assess the presence of REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder (RBD) according to standard clinical assessment. Polysomnographic findings were coded as present/absent/unknown for the diagnosis of RBD.

    From enrollment to the end of the diagnostic rounds (typically 3 months).

Study Arms (4)

MCI

The MCI group consists of participants diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), in accordance with clinical consensus criteria. This can be of MCI-Lewy body type, MCI-Alzheimer´s disease type, MCI-Parkinson´s disease type, or MCI-other type

DLB

The DLB group consists of participants diagnosed with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) according to clinical criteria from the international consensus.

Cognitively Unimpaired

The Cognitively Unimpaired group refers to those participants without indications of cognitive impairment, including two subgroups: healthy controls and people with subjective cognitive decline

Other Dementias

The Other Dementias group includes participants diagnosed with forms of dementia other than dementia with Lewy bodies (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia), as well as those with dementia not otherwise specified.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participants are recruited from cognitive clinics in Stockholm, Sweden; and data is combined with other national and international cohorts

You may qualify if:

  • At least one core clinical feature of dementia with Lewy bodies such as visual hallucinations, parkinsonism, cognitive fluctuations, or probable REM sleep behaviour disorder.

You may not qualify if:

  • Causes of cognitive impairment other than those related to dementia or MCI. Current or pass drug use.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, 14157, Sweden

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Halliday G, Taylor JP, Weintraub D, Aarsland D, Galvin J, Attems J, Ballard CG, Bayston A, Beach TG, Blanc F, Bohnen N, Bonanni L, Bras J, Brundin P, Burn D, Chen-Plotkin A, Duda JE, El-Agnaf O, Feldman H, Ferman TJ, Ffytche D, Fujishiro H, Galasko D, Goldman JG, Gomperts SN, Graff-Radford NR, Honig LS, Iranzo A, Kantarci K, Kaufer D, Kukull W, Lee VMY, Leverenz JB, Lewis S, Lippa C, Lunde A, Masellis M, Masliah E, McLean P, Mollenhauer B, Montine TJ, Moreno E, Mori E, Murray M, O'Brien JT, Orimo S, Postuma RB, Ramaswamy S, Ross OA, Salmon DP, Singleton A, Taylor A, Thomas A, Tiraboschi P, Toledo JB, Trojanowski JQ, Tsuang D, Walker Z, Yamada M, Kosaka K. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2017 Jul 4;89(1):88-100. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

    PMID: 28592453BACKGROUND
  • Gravett S, Garcia-Ptacek S, Rennie A, Bogdanovic N, Bonnard A, Granberg T, Nordberg A, Jelic V, Ferreira D. Find-DLB: a naturalistic cohort of patients presenting with clinical features of dementia with Lewy bodies to a specialized cognitive clinic. Eur Geriatr Med. 2026 Feb;17(1):309-321. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01372-z. Epub 2025 Dec 8.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lewy Body DiseaseCognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDementiaMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersCognition Disorders

Central Study Contacts

Daniel Ferreira, Docent, Senior Lecturer

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Senior Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2026

First Posted

June 5, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2031

Last Updated

June 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD data from primary and secondary outcomes as well as grouping can be shared with any qualified researcher at a reasonable request to daniel.ferreira.padilla@ki.se, provided that data sharing aligns with current regulations

Time Frame
at any time
Access Criteria
IPD data can be shared with any qualified researcher at a reasonable request to daniel.ferreira.padilla@ki.se, provided that data sharing aligns with current

Locations