Pelvic Floor Therapies for Lifelong Premature Ejaculation
PE-PFMT
Electromagnetic Pelvic Floor Stimulation Versus Biofeedback-Assisted and Conventional Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Men With Lifelong Premature Ejaculation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial will compare three pelvic floor-based treatment modalities in men with lifelong premature ejaculation: electromagnetic pelvic floor stimulation, biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, and conventional pelvic floor muscle training. A total of 150 men aged 18 to 50 years with lifelong premature ejaculation and stopwatch-measured intravaginal ejaculatory latency time of less than 1 minute will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. The primary outcome will be the change in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time from baseline to the end of treatment at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include changes in Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool score, International Index of Erectile Function-5 score, patient-reported ejaculatory control, sexual satisfaction, partner satisfaction, treatment adherence, and adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2027
June 4, 2026
May 1, 2026
10 months
May 30, 2026
May 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time at 6 Weeks
Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time will be measured using a stopwatch. The average of at least three consecutive intercourse attempts will be recorded. The outcome will be expressed as the change in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time from baseline to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time at 3 Months
Baseline and 3 months
Change in Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool Score at 6 Weeks
Baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Patient-Reported Ejaculatory Control at 6 Weeks
Baseline and 6 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Electromagnetic Pelvic Floor Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALParticipants allocated to this arm will receive non-invasive electromagnetic pelvic floor stimulation over a 6-week treatment period according to the institutional pelvic floor rehabilitation protocol.
Biofeedback-Assisted Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants allocated to this arm will receive supervised pelvic floor muscle training assisted by biofeedback over a 6-week treatment period to improve pelvic floor muscle awareness, contraction, relaxation, and coordination.
Conventional Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants allocated to this arm will receive conventional pelvic floor muscle training over a 6-week treatment period according to the institutional pelvic floor rehabilitation protocol.
Interventions
Non-invasive electromagnetic pelvic floor stimulation will be applied to induce repeated pelvic floor muscle contractions. Treatment will be delivered over 6 weeks according to the institutional pelvic floor rehabilitation protocol.
Participants will receive supervised pelvic floor muscle training assisted by biofeedback over a 6-week treatment period to improve pelvic floor muscle awareness, contraction, relaxation, and coordination.
Participants will receive conventional pelvic floor muscle training aimed at improving pelvic floor muscle control and ejaculatory control. Treatment will be delivered over 6 weeks according to the institutional physiotherapy protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men aged 18 to 50 years.
- Diagnosis of lifelong premature ejaculation.
- Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time less than 1 minute.
- Ability and willingness to comply with the treatment protocol and follow-up visits.
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Erectile dysfunction.
- Neurological disease.
- Previous pelvic surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanta Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Urology- Tanra University Hospitals
Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed I Elmaadawy, MD
Tanta University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessment will be performed by an assessor who will be blinded to treatment allocation. Participants and treatment providers cannot be blinded because of the nature of the physical and behavioral interventions. Treatment allocation will not be disclosed to the outcome assessor during follow-up data collection and analysis.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2026
First Posted
June 4, 2026
Study Start
April 26, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves sensitive individual-level sexual health data. Results will be reported only in aggregated, de-identified form. Any future sharing of anonymized data would require additional ethics committee approval and compliance with participant consent and institutional regulations.