Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AI Localization Models in Multidisciplinary Team Care for NSCLC
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a locally deployed artificial intelligence (AI) decision-support model in the multidisciplinary team (MDT) process for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main questions it aims to answer : What is the level of agreement between treatment recommendations generated by the AI model and those made by a traditional MDT? How often do clinicians modify their final treatment decision after reviewing the AI model's recommendation? Researchers will compare treatment plans from the traditional MDT (Arm 1), the AI model (Arm 2), and the clinician's final decision after reviewing the AI output (Arm 3) to assess consistency, decision modification rates, and clinical efficiency. Participants will: Have their clinical, imaging, and molecular data submitted to both the traditional MDT and the AI model for independent treatment recommendations Receive a final treatment plan determined by clinicians after reviewing both recommendations, with follow-up for safety and survival outcomes
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer
Started Dec 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
June 4, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.9 years
March 25, 2026
May 31, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Consistency rate
Consistency rate between Option 1 and Option 2 (calculated using Kappa value). Consistency rate between Option 1 and Option 3 (decision modification rate).
Baseline(MDT 1 Day)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
MDT Discussion Process Time
Baseline(MDT Day 1)
Quality of AI Recommendations
Baseline(MDT Day 1)
Clinical Acceptability of AI
Baseline(MDT Day 1)
MDT Discussion Efficiency
Baseline(MDT Day 1)
Process Convenience
Baseline(MDT Day 1)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
AI-Assisted Multidisciplinary Team Decision-Making for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The impact of artificial intelligence on clinicians' treatment plans
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- MDT (Multidisciplinary Team) discussion deems a systemic treatment plan necessary;
- Complete clinical, imaging, and molecular pathological data.
You may not qualify if:
- Stage I patients;
- Diagnosed with a thoracic tumor other than NSCLC;
- Lack of detailed medical data, or missing data;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wen-zhao ZHONGlead
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Related Publications (3)
Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, Corcoran N, Tran B, Bowden P, Crowe J, Costello AJ. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
PMID: 26643552RESULTKim JK, Chua ME, Li TG, Rickard M, Lorenzo AJ. Novel AI applications in systematic review: GPT-4 assisted data extraction, analysis, review of bias. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Sep 22;30(5):313-322. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113066.
PMID: 40199559RESULTWiegand TLT, Jung LB, Gudera JA, Schuhmacher LS, Moehrle P, Rischewski JF, Mehrzad P, Jeong S, Nguyen LH, Poeschla M, Velezmoro LI, Kruk L, Dimitriadis K, Koerte IK. Demographic inaccuracies and biases in the depiction of patients by artificial intelligence text-to-image generators. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 19;8(1):459. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01817-6.
PMID: 40683994RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2026
First Posted
June 4, 2026
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
June 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05