To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia
2 other identifiers
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
ABSTRACT: Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN). Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. A total of 44 patients, fulfilling inclusion criteria, were included.Half were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine (300 mg twice daily) and half were given combination therapy with gabapentin (100 mg daily) plus oxcarbazepine. Pain was evaluated utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months. SPSS software version 26 was used for statistical analysis. KEYWORDS: Combination Therapy, Gabapentin, Monotherapy, Oxcarbazepine, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Visual Analogue Scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2026
CompletedJune 4, 2026
May 1, 2026
1 year
May 13, 2026
June 3, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity (worse outcome). Participants will receive either oxcarbazepine monotherapy or combination therapy with gabapentin plus oxcarbazepine. VAS pain scores will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months to evaluate changes in pain intensity over time.
Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Oxcarbamezapine monotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup given monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine
Oxcarbamezapine plus gabapentine combination therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup given comination therapy(oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine)
Interventions
monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)
combination therapy of oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine was given
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of either gender aged 20-80 years
- Patients presenting to the Outpatient Department (OPD)
- Patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society (IHS)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with orofacial or odontogenic pain conditions other than trigeminal neuralgia (TN)
- Patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders
- Patients with a centralized cause of TN evident on MRI
- Patients unwilling to participate in the study
- Patients who failed to attend follow-up visits
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Patients with a history of previous surgical procedures for neuralgia
- Patients with known allergy to medications used for neuralgia
- Patients with significant comorbid medical conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rehman College of Dentistry
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25100, Pakistan
Related Publications (5)
Cheshire WP Jr. Defining the role for gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study. J Pain. 2002 Apr;3(2):137-42. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.122944.
PMID: 14622800BACKGROUNDTexakalidis P, Xenos D, Tora MS, Wetzel JS, Boulis NM. Comparative safety and efficacy of percutaneous approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;182:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 14.
PMID: 31121470BACKGROUNDDas B, Saha SP. Trigeminal neuralgia: current concepts and management. J Indian Med Assoc. 2001 Dec;99(12):704-9.
PMID: 12022221BACKGROUNDIshikawa R, Iseki M. [Pharmacological Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia]. No Shinkei Geka. 2024 Jan;52(1):63-69. doi: 10.11477/mf.1436204880. Japanese.
PMID: 38246671BACKGROUNDLee JY, Lee GH, Yi SH, Sim WS, Kim BW, Park HJ. Non-Surgical Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia from the Perspective of a Pain Physician: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 21;11(8):2315. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082315.
PMID: 37626811BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
iftikhar qayum, MBBS, MD, PHD
Rehman Medical Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2026
First Posted
June 4, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
June 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- Available indefinitely
- Access Criteria
- Other researchers doing similar drug trials. Access will be through email requests.
Relevant data can be shared upon genuine request