NCT07625397

Brief Summary

This quasi-experimental prospective clinical trial was conducted to compare the conventional sitting position with the Imran Technique, a novel ergonomic patient-positioning method, for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture. A total of 200 adult participants requiring spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture were allocated into two groups. The study aimed to evaluate procedural success, procedural efficiency, patient comfort, operator ergonomics, and procedure-related complications associated with the two positioning techniques.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 2, 2026

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 27, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 4, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 4, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

29 days

First QC Date

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Imran TechniqueSpinal AnesthesiaLumbar PuncturePatient PositioningErgonomicsProcedural SuccessAnesthesia Technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • First Attempt Procedural Success

    Successful spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture achieved with a single skin puncture on the first attempt.

    During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Total Procedural Time

    During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)

  • Number of Needle Attempts

    During the procedure

  • Needle Redirections

    During the procedure

  • Intervertebral Space Changes

    During the procedure

  • Overall Procedural Success

    During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Conventional Sitting Position

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants underwent spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture using the conventional sitting position according to standard institutional practice.

Procedure: Conventional Sitting Position

Imran Technique

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants underwent spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture using the Imran Technique, a novel ergonomic positioning method designed to improve lumbar flexion, operator ergonomics, and procedural access.

Procedure: Imran Technique

Interventions

Standard sitting patient positioning used for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture procedures.

Conventional Sitting Position

A novel ergonomic patient positioning technique for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture involving lateral operator positioning and assisted lumbar flexion to improve procedural access and success.

Imran Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult participants aged 18 to 65 years
  • Participants requiring spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture
  • Participants medically suitable for spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture
  • Participants able to assume and maintain the assigned procedural position
  • Participants who provided written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Age below 18 years or above 65 years
  • Previous spinal surgery
  • Significant spinal deformity
  • Local infection at the puncture site
  • Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
  • Raised intracranial pressure
  • Severe hemodynamic instability
  • Inability to maintain the assigned procedural position
  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wah Medical College, POF Hospital Wah cantt

Wah, Punjab Province, 4070, Pakistan

Location

Study Officials

  • Imran Ul Haq, MBBS, FCPS

    Wah Medical College (NUMS) / POF Hospital Wah Cantt, Pakistan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were allocated into two parallel groups to compare the conventional sitting position with the Imran Technique for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2026

First Posted

June 4, 2026

Study Start

March 2, 2026

Primary Completion

March 31, 2026

Study Completion

March 31, 2026

Last Updated

June 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published article, after de-identification.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Beginning 1 year after publication

Locations