NCT07624552

Brief Summary

Conduction system pacing has emerged as a physiological pacing strategy that preserves ventricular electrical activation and minimizes pacing-induced dyssynchrony. However, the optimal atrioventricular delay setting in patients undergoing conduction system pacing remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of individualized echocardiography-guided atrioventricular delay optimization on ventricular function and hemodynamic performance in patients with conduction system pacing. Echocardiographic parameters including global longitudinal strain, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral, cardiac output, and diastolic function indices will be assessed before and after atrioventricular delay optimization. The study will investigate whether optimization of atrioventricular timing provides additional mechanical and hemodynamic benefits beyond physiological ventricular activation achieved by conduction system pacing alone.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 6, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 17, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 17, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 29, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Atrioventicular BlockAtrioventricular Delay OptimizationConduction System PacingGlobal Longitudinal StrainMechanical ResynchronizationVentricular Function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)

    Assessment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography before and after atrioventricular delay optimization.

    Immediately before and immediately after atrioventricular delay optimization.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity-Time Integral (LVOT VTI)

    Immediately before and immediately after atrioventricular delay optimization.

  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

    Immediately before and immediately after atrioventricular delay optimization.

Study Arms (1)

Echocardiography-Guided AV Delay Optimization

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with conduction system pacing undergo individualized echocardiography-guided atrioventricular delay optimization. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters are assessed before and after optimization.

Device: Echocardiography-Guided Atrioventricular Delay Optimization

Interventions

Atrioventricular delay settings are individually optimized using echocardiographic assessment of transmitral inflow and ventricular filling patterns. Device programming is adjusted to achieve optimal atrioventricular coupling and ventricular performance.

Also known as: AV Delay Optimization
Echocardiography-Guided AV Delay Optimization

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 80 years
  • Permanent conduction system pacing implantation for atrioventricular block
  • At least 1 month elapsed since device implantation
  • Sinus rhythm at the time of enrollment
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction \>40%
  • Adequate echocardiographic image quality for comprehensive assessment
  • Ability and willingness to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Significant valvular heart disease
  • Active malignancy
  • Severe systemic illness with limited life expectancy
  • Sinus node dysfunction requiring alternative pacing strategies
  • Inadequate echocardiographic image quality
  • Inability to comply with study procedures
  • Refusal to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Health Sciences Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital

Bursa, Yıldırım, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Glikson et al. ESC Clinical Consensus Statement on Conduction System Pacing Glikson M, Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA, et al. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) clinical consensus statement on indications for conduction system pacing. Europace. 2025;27(4):euaf050. Coluccia et al. Optimization of the Atrioventricular Delay in Conduction System Pacing Coluccia G, Padeletti L, Della Bella P, et al. Optimization of the atrioventricular delay in conduction system pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34(6):1441-1451. Pujol-López et al. LEVEL-AT Trial Secondary Findings Pujol-López M, et al. Longitudinal comparison of dyssynchrony correction and strain improvement by conduction system pacing: LEVEL-AT trial secondary findings. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;25(10):1394-1404. Hua et al. Comparison of Left Bundle Branch and His Bundle Pacing Hua W, Fan X, Niu H, et al. Comparison of left bundle branch and His bundle pacing in bradycardia patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(10):1291-1299. Sweeney et al. Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2932-2937.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrioventricular Block

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart BlockArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ahmet Tütüncü

    Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a prospective, single-center, single-group interventional study. All enrolled participants with conduction system pacing undergo individualized echocardiography-guided atrioventricular delay optimization. Ventricular function and hemodynamic parameters are evaluated before and after optimization using transthoracic echocardiography. Each participant serves as his or her own control for outcome assessment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Cardiology Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2026

First Posted

June 3, 2026

Study Start

October 6, 2025

Primary Completion

February 17, 2026

Study Completion

February 17, 2026

Last Updated

June 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations