Multifamily Healing Spaces for Family Resilience in Rwanda
MFHS-CRT
The Effectiveness of Multi-Family Healing Spaces on Family Resilience and Mental Health Outcomes: A Multi-Site Cluster-Randomized Waitlist-Control Trial in Rwanda
2 other identifiers
interventional
319
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This cluster-randomized waitlist-control trial evaluated Multifamily Healing Spaces (MFHS), a culturally adapted behavioral family intervention for genocide-affected communities in Rwanda. Community members across five districts were screened through a staged triage process. Individuals with acute or severe clinical concerns were routed to clinical referral, those with individual mental-health needs were prioritized for Resilience-Oriented Therapy, and families were invited to MFHS when at least one screened family member met criteria for family communication difficulties. Twenty eligible clusters were randomly selected and then allocated to MFHS or waitlist control. The baseline cohort included 319 family members aged 12 years or older. The trial tested whether MFHS improved family resilience, parenting, couple and youth family-system outcomes, and secondary mental health, psychosocial, community, and livelihood outcomes from baseline to immediate post-intervention endline.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2026
CompletedJune 2, 2026
May 1, 2026
5 months
May 20, 2026
May 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Family Resilience
Family resilience was measured with the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire. The local version included 32 items forming belief systems, organization patterns, and communication/problem solving subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating stronger family resilience processes.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Parenting Practices
Parenting practices were measured with the Parenting Practices Questionnaire. The local version included 20 items forming authoritative warmth/involvement, authoritative democratic participation, and authoritarian verbal hostility subscales. Subscale scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more of the named parenting behavior.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Parent Couple Functioning
Parent couple functioning was measured with parent-only measures of dyadic adjustment, dyadic happiness, sexual relationship decision-making power, and preference for boys over girls. Dyadic adjustment domains range from 0 to 3 and dyadic happiness ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better couple functioning. Sexual relationship decision-making power ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating more respondent decision-making authority. Preference for boys over girls ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating stronger preference for boys over girls.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Change in Youth Family-System Functioning
Youth family-system functioning was measured with youth-only family enmeshment and personal accountability scores. Family enmeshment was measured with seven items ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater over-involvement or lower differentiation. Personal accountability was measured with eight items ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater youth responsibility and accountability.
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Borderline Traits
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Aggression
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Forgiveness and Community Relations
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Change in Socioemotional Skills
Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Multifamily Healing Spaces
EXPERIMENTALClusters allocated to Multifamily Healing Spaces (MFHS) received the behavioral family intervention during the trial evaluation period. MFHS was delivered to families in group formats using intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only sessions.
Waitlist Control
NO INTERVENTIONClusters allocated to waitlist control did not receive MFHS during the baseline-to-endline evaluation period. Families were invited to receive MFHS after the evaluation period.
Interventions
MFHS is a culturally adapted, group-based family intervention for genocide-affected communities in Rwanda. It includes 18 core 3-hour meeting occasions in intergenerational, whole-family, parent-only, and youth-only formats. Sessions focus on trauma-informed psychoeducation, family communication and problem solving, shared meaning-making, parenting, couple relationships, youth voice, and family and community resilience. Groups were facilitated by trained facilitators, including a therapist and community volunteer, with facilitator training and supervision.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Member of a family living in or connected to a selected MFHS-eligible cluster/cell in one of the five study districts in Rwanda.
- Aged 12 years or older.
- Family invited because at least one screened family member met the staged MFHS criterion for family communication difficulties after higher-priority clinical and individual mental-health triage.
- Able and willing to participate in baseline assessment and, if allocated to MFHS, family/group sessions.
- Written informed consent, assent, and/or caregiver permission obtained according to age and local ethics requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with suicidality, psychosis, or severe substance-use flags were routed for clinical interview or hospital referral rather than MFHS as first-line allocation.
- Individuals meeting higher-priority individual mental-health criteria were routed to Resilience-Oriented Therapy before the MFHS screening stage.
- Individuals or families unable to provide consent/assent or safely participate in group family sessions were not enrolled.
- Remaining individuals with social-conflict indicators after earlier stages were routed to sociotherapy rather than MFHS.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Rwandacollaborator
- Alexandros Lordos, PhDlead
- Interpeacecollaborator
- Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Developmentcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Community and Health-Centre Settings, Ngoma District
Ngoma, Eastern Province, Rwanda
Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyagatare District
Nyagatare, Eastern Province, Rwanda
Community and Health-Centre Settings, Musanze District
Ruhengeri, Northern Province, Rwanda
Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyamagabe District
Nyamagabe, Southern Province, Rwanda
Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyabihu District
Nyabihu, Western Province, Rwanda
Related Publications (2)
Lordos, A., Interayamahanga, R., Kayitare, F., Dukuzumuremyi, E., Mahoro, M., Mwiza, J., & Mbanda, J. (2026). Establishing multi-stakeholder alliances to promote societal healing and resilience in post-genocide Rwanda. In S. Clarke-Habibi & C. Reimann (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Trauma-Responsive Peacebuilding (pp. 411-424). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003536970-33
BACKGROUNDNikolaou, K., Lordos, A., Rutembesa, E., Ioannou, M., Dukuzumuremyi, E., Christou, G., Meade, A., Karayianni, E., Anastasiou, E., Guest, A., Sezibera, V., Panayiotou, O., Throstur, B., & Kayitare, F. (2025). Multifamily Healing Spaces: Development of a family-based intervention for recovery and resilience in Rwanda. Intervention, 23(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.4103/intv.intv_16_24
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandros Lordos, PhD
University of Cyprus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Baseline enumerators and participants were intended to be unaware of condition assignment during baseline outcome measurement. After allocation, masking could not be assured because local implementation required allocation lists before groups could be convened, and endline masking was difficult to maintain because participants could disclose their allocation status.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Skills and Resilience Lab, Department of Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2026
First Posted
June 2, 2026
Study Start
April 28, 2023
Primary Completion
September 15, 2023
Study Completion
September 15, 2023
Last Updated
June 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Available after publication, with no predetermined end date.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers must submit a methodologically sound proposal to the first author. Access will be subject to approval by the study team and any applicable ethics, data-protection, and partner-organization requirements. Shared data will be de-identified.
De-identified participant-level data underlying the manuscript analyses may be shared with qualified researchers on reasonable request to the first author, subject to ethics, data-protection, and partner-organization approvals.