Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Electric Field Ablation for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neoplasms
3 other identifiers
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial tests the safety and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms. Pancreatic cancer is a fatal disease that is difficult to diagnose at an early stage. The approach for pancreatic neoplasm treatment has changed and the recognition of minimally invasive treatments is growing. One such minimally invasive treatment, known as endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation, offers an alternative to surgery for managing certain precancerous or high-risk pancreatic cysts. The Aliya Pulsed Electric Field system uses brief, strong bursts of electricity, delivered through a thin needle, to destroy targeted tissue, such as tumors, without using heat. These electric pulses damage only the cells inside the treatment zone, leaving the healthy tissues and important nearby structures unharmed. This makes the treatment safer and less likely to cause harm to sensitive areas around the tumor. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation may be safe and feasible for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
June 2, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.4 years
May 27, 2026
May 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of procedure-related adverse events
Incidence, type, and severity of adverse events will be assessed and graded per the American Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Event classification system (and Atlanta Classification for pancreatitis). All adverse events will be collected and tabulated by type, severity, and relationship to the procedure. Results will be reported as counts, rates, and percentages. Where appropriate, 95% confidence intervals for proportions will be provided.
From start of procedure, up to 30 days post procedure
Technical success rate (feasibility)
Defined as successful delivery of pulsed electric field energy to the target pancreatic lesion with completion of the planned ablation protocol, including adequate coverage of the intended lesion and absence of major technical failure. The proportion of cases in which the EUS-PEF procedure is successfully completed (technical feasibility) will be described as a percentage.
At post-procedure and 1 calendar year after endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation (EUS-PEF)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Efficacy of EUS-PEF
At 1 calendar year after EUS-PEF
Long-term response to EUS-PEF
At 2 and 3 calendar years after EUS-PEF
Study Arms (1)
Treatment (EUS-PEF)
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo standard of care endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration followed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation on day 0.
Interventions
Undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided pulsed electric field ablation
Undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- A diagnosis of a pancreatic neoplasm confirmed by EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) - (a) pancreatic cystic lesion such as intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), (b) World Health Organization (WHO) grade I neuroendocrine tumor
- Lesion size estimation by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or EUS: (a) pancreatic cystic lesion such as IPMN - at least 2 cm in diameter. (b) WHO grade I neuroendocrine tumor - at least 1 cm in diameter
- The patient is not a surgical candidate. Common clinical scenarios include -
- Cirrhosis of the liver (common clinical scenario)
- Advanced (≥ 75 years) age (common clinical scenario)
- Morbid obesity
- Significant cardiorespiratory comorbidity
- Patient's choice (patient elects for non-surgical management)
- Other significant comorbid conditions that impose prohibitive surgical risks
- The patient prefers non-surgical management after consultation with hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery
- For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) and all pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs): Estimated life expectancy of at least 1 year
- Capable of giving written informed consent or has a legally authorized representative (LAR) to consent for them
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (serum/urine) on the day of treatment. Pregnancy testing is the routine standard of care practice in the endoscopy laboratory for all patients undergoing endoscopy and sedation for endoscopy
- The patient is not a surgical candidate and has had prior attempts at ablation of the PCN by EUS-RFA (Ohio State University \[OSU\] Institutional Review Board \[IRB\] protocol: 2023C0004)
You may not qualify if:
- Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases, or laboratory findings that, in the investigator's opinion, make it unsafe for the patient to participate in the study study
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Clinical frailty scale
- Contraindication to general anesthesia after review by OSU Preoperative Assessment Clinic (OPAC)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Somashekar G Krishna, MD, MPH
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Central Study Contacts
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2026
First Posted
June 2, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
June 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05