NCT02911974

Brief Summary

This is a randomized prospective clinical study comparing a fine needle biopsy device and an aspiration needle.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2016

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 15, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

August 22, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

fine needle biopsyEUSsolid pancreatic mass

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The total area of procured tissue between the FNA and FNB needles

    The primary objective of this study is to compare the total area of procured tissue between the FNA and FNB needles in patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic masses. Pancreatic masses sampled using the FNB needle should have a tissue area greater than the FNA needle because of the serrated design of the FNB needle tip. This will be measured using a specialized digital image analysis software. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing the total tissue area, tumor area within the tissue, stroma area within the tissue, tumor vs. stroma ratio and the macroscopic length of the procured tissue measured in millimeters. The total of these measurements will provide information about the area of procured tissue.

    6 months.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic adequacy between the FNA and FNB needles

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Acquire EUS Biopsy Device

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All patients will undergo sampling of pancreatic masses using the Acquire EUS Biopsy Device. Both needles will be used, but the needle to be used first will be based on randomization. A minimum of at least one pass and a maximum of 8 passes will be performed using both needle types.

Device: Acquire EUS Biopsy Device

Expect EUS Aspiration Needle

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All patients will undergo sampling of pancreatic masses using the Expect EUS Aspiration Needle. Both needles will be used, but the needle to be used first will be based on randomization. A minimum of at least one pass and a maximum of 8 passes will be performed using both needle types

Device: Expect EUS Aspiration Needle

Interventions

1\. At EUS, once the pancreatic mass is identified, patients will be randomized to undergo sampling using the 22G Acquire EUS Biopsy Device or Expect EUS Aspiration Needle.

Acquire EUS Biopsy Device

1\. At EUS, once the pancreatic mass is identified, patients will be randomized to undergo sampling using the 22G Acquire EUS Biopsy Device or Expect EUS Aspiration Needle.

Expect EUS Aspiration Needle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Scheduled to undergo EUS
  • Patients with solid pancreatic masses on cross-sectional imaging or with jaundice secondary to biliary obstruction
  • Able and willing to provide written or verbal consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
  • Coagulopathy (Prothrombin time \> 18 secs, platelet count \< 80,000/ml)
  • Active alcohol or other drug use or significant psychiatric illness
  • Pregnancy
  • Unable or unwilling to provide consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Center for Interventional Endoscopy - Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.049.

    PMID: 22248600BACKGROUND
  • Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, Roberts S, Wildi S, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Wallace MB. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004 May;36(5):397-401. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814316.

    PMID: 15100946BACKGROUND
  • Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016 Apr;48(4):339-49. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393354. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

    PMID: 26561917BACKGROUND
  • Ngamruengphong S, Li F, Zhou Y, Chak A, Cooper GS, Das A. EUS and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):78-83, 83.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.072.

  • Othman MO, Wallace MB. The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;41(1):179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Shyam Varadarajulu, MD

    AdventHealth

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2016

First Posted

September 23, 2016

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2017

Study Completion

August 1, 2018

Last Updated

February 15, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations