Comparing Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Samples for Pancreatic Masses
Expect
Randomized Trial Comparing Fine Needle Biopsy and Fine Needle Aspiration Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound -Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Masses
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized prospective clinical study comparing a fine needle biopsy device and an aspiration needle.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 15, 2019
February 1, 2019
11 months
August 22, 2016
February 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The total area of procured tissue between the FNA and FNB needles
The primary objective of this study is to compare the total area of procured tissue between the FNA and FNB needles in patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic masses. Pancreatic masses sampled using the FNB needle should have a tissue area greater than the FNA needle because of the serrated design of the FNB needle tip. This will be measured using a specialized digital image analysis software. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing the total tissue area, tumor area within the tissue, stroma area within the tissue, tumor vs. stroma ratio and the macroscopic length of the procured tissue measured in millimeters. The total of these measurements will provide information about the area of procured tissue.
6 months.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic adequacy between the FNA and FNB needles
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Acquire EUS Biopsy Device
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients will undergo sampling of pancreatic masses using the Acquire EUS Biopsy Device. Both needles will be used, but the needle to be used first will be based on randomization. A minimum of at least one pass and a maximum of 8 passes will be performed using both needle types.
Expect EUS Aspiration Needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients will undergo sampling of pancreatic masses using the Expect EUS Aspiration Needle. Both needles will be used, but the needle to be used first will be based on randomization. A minimum of at least one pass and a maximum of 8 passes will be performed using both needle types
Interventions
1\. At EUS, once the pancreatic mass is identified, patients will be randomized to undergo sampling using the 22G Acquire EUS Biopsy Device or Expect EUS Aspiration Needle.
1\. At EUS, once the pancreatic mass is identified, patients will be randomized to undergo sampling using the 22G Acquire EUS Biopsy Device or Expect EUS Aspiration Needle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled to undergo EUS
- Patients with solid pancreatic masses on cross-sectional imaging or with jaundice secondary to biliary obstruction
- Able and willing to provide written or verbal consent
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
- Coagulopathy (Prothrombin time \> 18 secs, platelet count \< 80,000/ml)
- Active alcohol or other drug use or significant psychiatric illness
- Pregnancy
- Unable or unwilling to provide consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AdventHealthlead
Study Sites (1)
Center for Interventional Endoscopy - Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Related Publications (5)
Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.049.
PMID: 22248600BACKGROUNDVaradarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, Roberts S, Wildi S, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Wallace MB. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004 May;36(5):397-401. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814316.
PMID: 15100946BACKGROUNDBang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016 Apr;48(4):339-49. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393354. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
PMID: 26561917BACKGROUNDNgamruengphong S, Li F, Zhou Y, Chak A, Cooper GS, Das A. EUS and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):78-83, 83.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.072.
PMID: 20620274RESULTOthman MO, Wallace MB. The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;41(1):179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
PMID: 22341257RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shyam Varadarajulu, MD
AdventHealth
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2016
First Posted
September 23, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share