A Two-year Study Evaluating the Surface-sealed Cervical Resin Composite Restorations in Comparison With the Non-sealed Restorations
Clinical Effectiveness of Using Surface Sealants on Cervical Resin Composite Restorations in Comparison With Non-sealed Restorations: A 2-year Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
After finishing and polishing are completed, the tooth surface may exhibit microcracks and micro-irregularities that create a roughened surface, which may lead to plaque retention, gingival inflammation, and discoloration. The surface-penetrating sealant was introduced to fill micro-irregularities by capillary action, providing a uniform, regular surface and enhancing the surface smoothness. The application of unfilled low-viscosity surface sealants aims to enhance the luster, smoothness, and color stability of esthetic restorations and decrease stain absorption. They have low viscosity that enables them to easily spread and penetrate over these finished and polished surfaces, which may affect the life of the restoration positively. Additionally, it decreases surface porosity and creates a surface that is more thoroughly cured, improving the composite's stain resistance. This prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of using surface sealants on cervical resin composite restorations versus non-sealed restorations. Restorations will be assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months using modified USPHS criteria. The primary outcome will be assessing marginal discoloration, and the secondary outcomes will be assessing color match, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, surface texture, and marginal adaptation. Color stability will be assessed by VITA Easyshade®.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2028
June 5, 2026
May 1, 2026
2 years
May 24, 2026
June 4, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Marginal discoloration
Modified USPHS criteria
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Color match, Secondary caries, Postoperative sensitivity, Surface texture , Marginal adaptation
2 years
Color stability
2 years
Study Arms (3)
Unfilled resin surface sealant group
EXPERIMENTALPatients with carious cervical lesions (class V) in the esthetic zone receiving resin composite restorations covered by the Unfilled resin surface sealant
Nano-filled resin surface sealant group
EXPERIMENTALPatients with carious cervical lesions (class V) in the esthetic zone receiving resin composite restorations covered by the Nano-filled resin surface sealant
Class V Restorations without resin surface sealants.
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with carious cervical lesions (class V) in the esthetic zone receiving resin composite restorations not covered by the resin surface sealant
Interventions
Unfilled resin surface sealant
Unfilled resin surface sealant
Restorations without resin surface sealants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 18-55 years.
- Patients with good oral hygiene (mild to moderate plaque accumulation).
- Patients with asymptomatic class V cavities in permanent teeth.
- Vital posterior teeth with class V carious cavities.
- Moderate cavities (ICDAS 3 \& 4).
- Free from signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis and pulpal necrosis.
- Teeth with no or grade 1 mobility.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are unable to return for recall appointments.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Presence of abnormal oral, medical, or mental condition
- Presence of any parafunctional habits.
- Patients with TMJ problems.
- Periodontal disease that may affect the prognosis of the restoration or the tooth itself.
- Fractured or visibly cracked teeth.
- Presence of any developmental or formative defects.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Related Publications (1)
• Amin, A. H., Yaakob, M. H., Nasir, W. Z. W., & Al-Kadhim, A. H. A. (2018). Evaluation the correlation between age, gender, and the incidence of cervical lesions. Journal of Clinical Research in Dentistry, 1(1). • Attia, R. M., Sobhy, E. M., & Abd El Hameed, M. E. S. (2023). Micro-Hardness and Surface Roughness of Bulk-Fill Composite Resin: Effect of Surface Sealant Application and Two Bleaching Regimens. European Journal of General Dentistry, 12(03), 169-176. • Calazans, F. S., Ferreira, T. D. M. J., Ñaupari-Villasante, R., Mendonça, R. P., Ornellas, G., Albuquerque, E. G., ... & Loguercio, A. D. (2024). Influence of surface sealants on the quality of posterior restorations with bulk-fill composites: A 4-year randomized clinical trial. Dental Materials, 40(3), 466-476. • Dawoud, B., Abou-Auf, E., & Shaalan, O. (2025). 24-Month clinical evaluation of cervical restorations bonded using radio-opaque universal adhesive compared to conventional universal adhesive in carious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 5505. • Demarco, F. F., Collares, K., Coelho-de-Souza, F. H., Correa, M. B., Cenci, M. S., Moraes, R. R., & Opdam, N. J. (2015). Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dental materials, 31(10), 1214-1224. • de Melo Soares, V., de Oliveira Bomfim, H. L. Q., Romão, D. A., de Moraes Porto, I. C. C., & de Mendonça Fragoso, L. S. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Marginal Microleakage Evaluation for Restored Teeth by Composite Resin. Journal of Health Sciences, 26(4), 221-225. • Elwassefy, N., ElEmbaby, A., & Elkholany, N. (2023). Correlation between surface roughness and color stability of nano-and micro-hybrid resin composites using different surface treatment protocols. Egyptian Dental Journal, 69(1), 705-713.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer Assistant, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2026
First Posted
June 1, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2028
Last Updated
June 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05