Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Height Changes And Biting Force In Screw Retained Implant Prostheses Using Reinforced Resin Vs Monolithic Zirconium
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This studies aims to compare the behavior of recently introduced resin reinforces compared to monolithic zirconia
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedJune 6, 2025
June 1, 2025
1 year
May 18, 2025
June 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of the Bone height changes (bone level)
Change in marginal bone height (in millimeters) measured using long cone parallel peri-apical radiographs at baseline and 6 months for each prosthetic material phase (monolithic zirconia and resin-reinforced). Radiographs will be taken at four time points: Start of phase 1 (zirconia, baseline) End of phase 1 (zirconia, 6 months) Start of phase 2 (resin-reinforced, baseline) End of phase 2 (resin-reinforced, 6 months) Bone level will be assessed on the mesial and distal surfaces of each implant using a standardized radiographic protocol.
6 months for each arm
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Average Maximum Biting Force
6 months for each arm
Study Arms (2)
patients who receives a screw retained monolithic zirconia bridge
ACTIVE COMPARATORDigitally-fabricated implant supported supra-structure fabricated from monolithic zirconia
patients who receives a screw retained resin reinforced bridge
EXPERIMENTALDigitally-fabricated implant supported supra-structure fabricated from reinforced resin
Interventions
A comprehensive clinical examination with an understanding of patients' chief complaints and needs will be carried out. For each patient, two implants will be placed in the edentulous area, and the patient will receive a screw-retained bridge supported by both implants made of milled monolithic zirconia (Dental Direkt Zirconia, Germany). After 6 months, the zirconia restoration will be replaced with a milled resin-reinforced composite (Nanoska G Plus, USA), allowing the same patient to use the new restoration for another 6 months. Randomization will be performed to determine the sequence of bridge material for each participant. Accordingly, the two restorations will be sequentially delivered to each participant with no gap (wash-up period) between them. Consent will be signed by the selected participants after explaining the detailed information of the trial.
Digitally-fabricated implant supported supra-structure fabricated from monolithic zirconia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mandibular Class II, partially edentulous patients that enables measuring the marginal bone height changes and values of biting forces intra-orally.
- Fully dentulous edentulous opposing Maxillary arch.
- Patients with normal class I jaw relationship.
- Patients that require fixed restorations for functional and esthetic reasons
- Age range (30-60 years).
- Cooperative patients those are willing to attend all follow-up periods.
- Patients with healthy attached mucosa of appropriate thickness free from any inflammation.
- Patients with healthy bone of appropriate thickness, width and height free from any inflammation.
- Patients without any medical conditions that contraindicates implant placement.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with Parkinson's disease
- Patients with xerostomia.
- Patients with a history of allergy to resins and/ or zirconia.
- Patients with a medical systematic condition that contraindicate implant placement.
- Patients smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.
- Patients with pathological changes of residual ridges as recurrent or persistent ulcers, osteomyelitis and infections.
- Patients with large irregular bony exostosis.
- Patients with medical or psychological conditions as physical disability or mental retardation that hinder cooperation in the follow up visits and answering the questionnaires.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (2)
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 12613, Egypt
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 12613, Egypt
Related Publications (6)
Roh, K.-W. et al. (2019) 'A prospective clinical of lithium disilicate pressed zirconia and monolithic zirconia in posterior implant-supported prostheses: A 24-month follow-up', The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics, 57(2), p. 134. doi: 10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.134.
RESULTNitschke I, Moede C, Hopfenmuller W, Sobotta BAJ, Koenig A, Jockusch J. Validation of a New Measuring Instrument for the Assessment of Bite Force. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;13(23):3498. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233498.
PMID: 38066739RESULTLiu, Y., Wang, S. and Chen, J. (2023) 'Challenges of monolithic zirconia in implant prosthodontics: Biting forces and maintenance considerations', Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 132(1), pp. 75-82. Available at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal- of-prosthetic-dentistry.
RESULTLee, K. H., Patel, M. A. and Smith, A. D. (2023) 'Enhancing function and esthetics in partial edentulism: The role of biomimetic materials', Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 130(2), pp. 150-158. Available at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-prosthetic- dentistry.
RESULTGomez, P. H. et al. (2023) 'Advances in resin composites: A review of biomimetic approaches in prosthetic dentistry', Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Available at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-prosthetic-dentistry.
RESULTAhmed, N., Patel, A. and Zhang, X. (2024) 'Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review of Complications and Management', International Journal of Prosthodontics, 37(2), pp. 214-223. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7698.
RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate lecturer- prosthodontics department- faculty of dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2025
First Posted
June 6, 2025
Study Start
December 31, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06