NCT07615218

Brief Summary

This study investigates the use of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire to assess supportive care needs among cancer patients and align patient-identified needs with physician-assessed needs. The aim is to enhance care delivery and referral to supportive clinics, including pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. Improved cancer care requires appropriate utilization of supportive clinics, particularly for patients with advanced or terminal disease. The study evaluated a navigation process for patients requiring supportive care services based on responses to the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire, conducted as part of the "Evidence-Based Patient Navigation" initiative. The questionnaire assessed multiple domains relevant to supportive care needs. Approval to use the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was obtained from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer before study initiation. The study process included both the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire, representing patient-identified needs, and physician-assessed needs across four supportive clinics: pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. Clinic navigation was determined by a threshold score ranging from 0 to 4. Patients requiring specialized support were defined as having a score greater than 2, whereas patients with scores of 2 or lower were classified as not requiring specialized supportive clinic referral. The data collection phase ran from January 1, 2024, to September 30, 2024, followed by data analysis. A consistency analysis was conducted to measure alignment between patient-identified needs and physician-assessed needs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4,423

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 2, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 30, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Patient NavigationQuality of Life (QoL)EORTC QLQ-C30Cancer Care / OncologySupportive CareSupportive ClinicsCross-Sectional StudyReferral Rates and AdherenceEnhancing Cancer Care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Agreement Between Patient-Identified Supportive Care Need and Physician-Assessed Supportive Care Need Measured by Cohen's Kappa Coefficient

    Patient-identified supportive care need will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and a study navigation score. The navigation score ranges from 0 to 4, with 1 point for each identified supportive clinic domain: pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. Higher scores indicate greater supportive care need. Scores \>2 indicate need for specialized supportive clinic referral; scores ≤2 indicate no referral need. Agreement between patient-identified and physician-assessed need classifications will be measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient, which ranges from -1 to +1. Higher kappa values indicate better agreement, with +1 indicating perfect agreement. Unit of Measure: Cohen's kappa coefficient

    Initial needs assessment and physician assessment, within approximately 1-2 weeks of enrollment

  • Accuracy of Patient-Identified Supportive Care Need Compared With Physician-Assessed Supportive Care Need

    Accuracy will be calculated as the percentage of participants for whom the patient-identified supportive care need classification matches the physician-assessed supportive care need classification. The four supportive clinic domains will be aggregated into one supportive-care navigation score, then dichotomized as greater than 2 versus 2 or lower before calculating accuracy. Accuracy will be calculated as: Accuracy = \[(Number of matching classifications) / (Total number of assessed participants)\] × 100 Possible values range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater alignment between patient-identified needs and physician-assessed needs. Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants

    At the initial needs assessment and physician assessment, within approximately 1-2 weeks of enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of patients referred to supportive clinics

    January 1, 2025 - September 30, 2025

Study Arms (1)

Adult Cancer Patients Requiring Supportive Care

This cross-sectional cohort consists of adult cancer patients (\> 18 years old) receiving active treatment or follow-up care at the Sohag Oncology Center who are cognitively and linguistically capable of completing the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The cohort includes patients across various stages of disease, specifically incorporating those with terminal diagnoses who require supportive interventions. Patients already receiving comprehensive, pre-established palliative care services are excluded.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population comprises adult cancer patients, including terminal cases, who are actively receiving medical treatment or oncology follow-up care within a tertiary care setting. All participants are drawn directly from the outpatient clinics of the Sohag Oncology Center, a specialized facility equipped with dedicated supportive services such as pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. This population represents individuals navigating complex healthcare barriers whose care pathways are being evaluated to align patient-reported quality-of-life needs with clinical physician assessments.

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis: Adult patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer, including terminal cases, requiring supportive care.
  • Cognition: Patients capable of providing informed consent and completing the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
  • Treatment Status: Patients actively receiving treatment or follow-up care in the participating healthcare facility.
  • Availability: Patients available for the study duration and willing to participate in both the questionnaire assessment and follow-up navigation processes.
  • Language: Patients able to understand and respond to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in the approved language version.

You may not qualify if:

  • Cognitive Impairment: Patients unable to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire due to severe cognitive impairment or mental health conditions that hinder participation.
  • Incomplete Consent: Patients who decline to provide informed consent or withdraw consent during the study.
  • Non-Cancer Diagnoses: Patients without a confirmed cancer diagnosis or those receiving treatment for non-cancer-related conditions.
  • Palliative Care Exclusivity: Patients already receiving comprehensive palliative care services that address the domains assessed in the study.
  • Inaccessible for Follow-Up: Patients who are not reachable for follow-up during the study duration or have logistical barriers that prevent participation in the navigation process.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sohag Oncology Center

Sohag, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, Garcia R, Greene A, Calhoun E, Mandelblatt JS, Paskett ED, Raich PC; Patient Navigation Research Program. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;113(8):1999-2010. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23815.

    PMID: 18780320BACKGROUND
  • Berry LL, Rock BL, Smith Houskamp B, Brueggeman J, Tucker L. Care coordination for patients with complex health profiles in inpatient and outpatient settings. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Feb;88(2):184-94. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.10.016. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

    PMID: 23290738BACKGROUND
  • Forrest CB, Glade GB, Baker AE, Bocian A, von Schrader S, Starfield B. Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 May;154(5):499-506. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.5.499.

    PMID: 10807303BACKGROUND
  • Freeman HP. The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Oct;21(10):1614-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0982. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23045534BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

  • Nesma Magdy Nesma, Pharmacist

    Sohag Oncology Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2026

First Posted

May 29, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

September 30, 2024

Study Completion

September 30, 2025

Last Updated

June 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations