Enhancing Cancer Care: Patient Navigation Through EORTC Quality-of-Life Insights at Sohag Oncology Center
EORTC
1 other identifier
observational
4,423
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study investigates the use of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire to assess supportive care needs among cancer patients and align patient-identified needs with physician-assessed needs. The aim is to enhance care delivery and referral to supportive clinics, including pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. Improved cancer care requires appropriate utilization of supportive clinics, particularly for patients with advanced or terminal disease. The study evaluated a navigation process for patients requiring supportive care services based on responses to the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire, conducted as part of the "Evidence-Based Patient Navigation" initiative. The questionnaire assessed multiple domains relevant to supportive care needs. Approval to use the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was obtained from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer before study initiation. The study process included both the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire, representing patient-identified needs, and physician-assessed needs across four supportive clinics: pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. Clinic navigation was determined by a threshold score ranging from 0 to 4. Patients requiring specialized support were defined as having a score greater than 2, whereas patients with scores of 2 or lower were classified as not requiring specialized supportive clinic referral. The data collection phase ran from January 1, 2024, to September 30, 2024, followed by data analysis. A consistency analysis was conducted to measure alignment between patient-identified needs and physician-assessed needs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2026
CompletedJune 2, 2026
May 1, 2026
9 months
May 22, 2026
May 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Agreement Between Patient-Identified Supportive Care Need and Physician-Assessed Supportive Care Need Measured by Cohen's Kappa Coefficient
Patient-identified supportive care need will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and a study navigation score. The navigation score ranges from 0 to 4, with 1 point for each identified supportive clinic domain: pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. Higher scores indicate greater supportive care need. Scores \>2 indicate need for specialized supportive clinic referral; scores ≤2 indicate no referral need. Agreement between patient-identified and physician-assessed need classifications will be measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient, which ranges from -1 to +1. Higher kappa values indicate better agreement, with +1 indicating perfect agreement. Unit of Measure: Cohen's kappa coefficient
Initial needs assessment and physician assessment, within approximately 1-2 weeks of enrollment
Accuracy of Patient-Identified Supportive Care Need Compared With Physician-Assessed Supportive Care Need
Accuracy will be calculated as the percentage of participants for whom the patient-identified supportive care need classification matches the physician-assessed supportive care need classification. The four supportive clinic domains will be aggregated into one supportive-care navigation score, then dichotomized as greater than 2 versus 2 or lower before calculating accuracy. Accuracy will be calculated as: Accuracy = \[(Number of matching classifications) / (Total number of assessed participants)\] × 100 Possible values range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater alignment between patient-identified needs and physician-assessed needs. Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants
At the initial needs assessment and physician assessment, within approximately 1-2 weeks of enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients referred to supportive clinics
January 1, 2025 - September 30, 2025
Study Arms (1)
Adult Cancer Patients Requiring Supportive Care
This cross-sectional cohort consists of adult cancer patients (\> 18 years old) receiving active treatment or follow-up care at the Sohag Oncology Center who are cognitively and linguistically capable of completing the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The cohort includes patients across various stages of disease, specifically incorporating those with terminal diagnoses who require supportive interventions. Patients already receiving comprehensive, pre-established palliative care services are excluded.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population comprises adult cancer patients, including terminal cases, who are actively receiving medical treatment or oncology follow-up care within a tertiary care setting. All participants are drawn directly from the outpatient clinics of the Sohag Oncology Center, a specialized facility equipped with dedicated supportive services such as pain management, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychotherapy. This population represents individuals navigating complex healthcare barriers whose care pathways are being evaluated to align patient-reported quality-of-life needs with clinical physician assessments.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis: Adult patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer, including terminal cases, requiring supportive care.
- Cognition: Patients capable of providing informed consent and completing the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
- Treatment Status: Patients actively receiving treatment or follow-up care in the participating healthcare facility.
- Availability: Patients available for the study duration and willing to participate in both the questionnaire assessment and follow-up navigation processes.
- Language: Patients able to understand and respond to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in the approved language version.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive Impairment: Patients unable to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire due to severe cognitive impairment or mental health conditions that hinder participation.
- Incomplete Consent: Patients who decline to provide informed consent or withdraw consent during the study.
- Non-Cancer Diagnoses: Patients without a confirmed cancer diagnosis or those receiving treatment for non-cancer-related conditions.
- Palliative Care Exclusivity: Patients already receiving comprehensive palliative care services that address the domains assessed in the study.
- Inaccessible for Follow-Up: Patients who are not reachable for follow-up during the study duration or have logistical barriers that prevent participation in the navigation process.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sohag Oncology Center
Sohag, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, Garcia R, Greene A, Calhoun E, Mandelblatt JS, Paskett ED, Raich PC; Patient Navigation Research Program. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;113(8):1999-2010. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23815.
PMID: 18780320BACKGROUNDBerry LL, Rock BL, Smith Houskamp B, Brueggeman J, Tucker L. Care coordination for patients with complex health profiles in inpatient and outpatient settings. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Feb;88(2):184-94. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.10.016. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
PMID: 23290738BACKGROUNDForrest CB, Glade GB, Baker AE, Bocian A, von Schrader S, Starfield B. Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 May;154(5):499-506. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.5.499.
PMID: 10807303BACKGROUNDFreeman HP. The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Oct;21(10):1614-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0982. No abstract available.
PMID: 23045534BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nesma Magdy Nesma, Pharmacist
Sohag Oncology Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2026
First Posted
May 29, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share